Skip to comments.
Policy Fred (NRO Editorial)
National Review ^
| November 14, 2007
| The Editors
Posted on 11/14/2007 5:44:21 PM PST by Josh Painter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Josh Painter
...excellent. GO FRed. :)
41
posted on
11/14/2007 7:54:44 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: Josh Painter
...excellent. GO FRed. :)
42
posted on
11/14/2007 7:55:03 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: Josh Painter
...excellent. GO FRed. :)
43
posted on
11/14/2007 7:55:08 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: Josh Painter
Do we conservatives support giving people’s tax money to other people who do what the government requires them to do?
To: Josh Painter
sorry. :( ...triple post.
45
posted on
11/14/2007 7:58:58 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: sefarkas
“At this pace, Thompson would have to be POTUS for the rest of his life. Why not propose something that POTUS can actually do without a Congressional majority? Too lame.”
They said the same thing about FDR, but 20 years latter his party implemented almost everything he fought for. Leaders see past their time. FDT is just here correct the mistakes and follies of the past.
46
posted on
11/14/2007 8:22:47 PM PST
by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: yield 2 the right
lol....lol....that can’t be the reason!?
47
posted on
11/14/2007 8:24:16 PM PST
by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: Josh Painter
Fred is kicking butt and taking names.
He is the ONLY candidate of EITHER party to stomp on the traditional “third rail” of political campaigns, Social Security. And his plan makes sense. Common sense.
Likewise his stance on illegal immigration. It’s reasoned, logical and, most important, DOABLE.
Massive FRed bump!!
48
posted on
11/14/2007 8:40:20 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
To: yield 2 the right
49
posted on
11/14/2007 9:09:27 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: ejonesie22
I’m quite certain he’s being sarcastic.
50
posted on
11/14/2007 9:13:59 PM PST
by
lesser_satan
(READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON/ DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
To: lesser_satan
51
posted on
11/14/2007 9:52:26 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: Josh Painter
First? To have a plan on immigration? McCain had a plan well before Fred. A plan to make things worse, true, but a plan nonetheless. When the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill was being defeated in the court of public opinion last summer Fred was silent, but not so many of those who were already in the race. Hunter and Tancredo were focusing on the issue before Fred even started ruminating about running. Romney also came out with his plan, and was running TV ads on it here in Iowa, well before Fred entered the race. There’s nothing wrong about Fred, finally, coming out with a plan on immigration and talking it up. But to claim he’s first to do so is unbelievable and doesn’t benefit his candidacy.
To: ejonesie22
I looked at some of his previous posts, I guess you’re right.
53
posted on
11/14/2007 10:15:11 PM PST
by
lesser_satan
(READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON/ DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
To: lesser_satan
54
posted on
11/14/2007 10:25:08 PM PST
by
ejonesie22
(Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
To: Josh Painter
The real reason this is important is because it’s coming from NRO, which seemed in the tank for Giuliani.
To: Blue Highway
That would be great to get rid of the “Press 1 for Spanish, Press 2 for English...” BS. Yes, I would love to hear, "For English, Press '1'. For Spanish, vaya se a Mexico."
56
posted on
11/15/2007 5:34:05 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(“Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?” - FDT)
To: sefarkas
The majority of Presidential candidates’ promises, from both sides, depend on the voters thinking that the President actually has the power to do something once in office. As we adults all know, the power of the Presidency is more persuasive than active.
57
posted on
11/15/2007 5:36:47 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
(Fred Thompson for President!)
To: yield 2 the right
58
posted on
11/15/2007 5:37:21 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
(Fred Thompson for President!)
To: JohnBovenmyer
Fred came out against the amnesty deal last summer before he was a candidate.
59
posted on
11/15/2007 5:47:13 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
(Fred Thompson for President!)
To: Tuba Guy
60
posted on
11/15/2007 5:48:26 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson