Skip to comments.
Noah's Ark Flood Spurred European Farming
Reuters) ^
| Nov 17, 2007
| Maggie Fox and Catherine Evans
Posted on 11/18/2007 8:58:45 AM PST by anymouse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: stormer
I think a great deal of the Bible's borrowings, it's metaphor and simile, it's law and narrative contributed like no other work before or since to bring Ethical Monotheism to the mind of Man.
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth...."
"If I knew God I'd be Him." But I know enough from His creation that it's good, and that we should strive for goodness therein.
21
posted on
11/18/2007 9:59:17 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: anymouse
the collapse of the North American ice sheet, which raised global sea levels by as much as 1.4 meters, displaced tens of thousands of people in southeastern Europe Sounds like "global warming" to me. And to think, they did it all without automobiles, industrialization, carbon offsets, and all the "evils" of big business, George W. Bush, America, and Western civilization.
22
posted on
11/18/2007 10:01:55 AM PST
by
wai-ming
To: Callahan
I'm a little shaky on my Noah story, but it's my understanding that god was pissed at humans and wanted to get rid of all of them except Noah and his family. If that's the case, rather than having a big storm, why no just "blink" them into nonexistence, kind of like Jeanie?
23
posted on
11/18/2007 10:02:53 AM PST
by
stormer
To: onedoug
I appreciate your thoughtful reply. I fail to understand how any modern human can conceivably interpret the Bible literally, yet it is done constantly.
24
posted on
11/18/2007 10:05:57 AM PST
by
stormer
To: Callahan
God placed all the animals in suspended animation ................ God could have shrunk them to amoeba size. If he left them the normal size he'd need an Ark the size of Manhattan to carry all the species. My big question is who was doing all the shoveling on the Ark? It has to be a 24/7 job otherwise they'd be buried in ....., you get the idea. Besides, did he forget the Chinese who were most likely around at that time? Oh, right, that was a different other God's responsibility.
25
posted on
11/18/2007 10:27:20 AM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Staying home or voting 3rd Party, Elects Hillary!)
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
"Aryans to North America 4400 years ago? Thats a new one to me." Me too. They got to NA much earlier than that...possibly as early a 25,000 years ago.
26
posted on
11/18/2007 10:39:44 AM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
Kennewick Man,or the Great American Indian Hoax or “Who’s on (the continent) first?”
27
posted on
11/18/2007 10:45:52 AM PST
by
redstateconfidential
(If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
To: redstateconfidential
Whos on (the continent) first? Vintage Skulls
"The oldest human remains found in the Americas were recently "discovered" in the storeroom of Mexico's National Museum of Anthropology. Found in central Mexico in 1959, the five skulls were radiocarbon dated by a team of researchers from the United Kingdom and Mexico and found to be 13,000 years old. They pre-date the Clovis culture by a couple thousand years, adding to the growing evidence against the Clovis-first model for the first peopling of the Americas."
"Of additional significance is the shape of the skulls, which are described as long and narrow, very unlike those of modern Native Americans."
28
posted on
11/18/2007 11:03:43 AM PST
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: stormer
Pretty Much (The Biblical Account)! And I believe there is empirical evidence that shows so (both Geological and Archeological..)!
29
posted on
11/18/2007 11:20:13 AM PST
by
JSDude1
(When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
To: JSDude1; DaveLoneRanger
30
posted on
11/18/2007 11:22:44 AM PST
by
JSDude1
(When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
To: stormer
I fail to understand how any modern human can conceivably interpret the Bible literally, yet it is done constantly. I plead guilty. I guess shame on me, huh?
31
posted on
11/18/2007 11:45:26 AM PST
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
To: anymouse
The real connection between the flood and European farming is that Japheth took some farming manuals to read during the flood, while his brothers just played checkers the whole time.
To: BipolarBob
33
posted on
11/18/2007 12:19:33 PM PST
by
stormer
To: JSDude1
I’m sure you do believe there is empirical evidence that supports a biblical account. Unfortunately, evidence is sometimes distorted (or worse) by agenda-driven organizations in order to maintain status quo. On closer or more rigorous inspection, often times what has been accepted as foundational, is simply an artifact of what amounts to wishful thinking.
34
posted on
11/18/2007 12:26:57 PM PST
by
stormer
To: stormer
And if all life was destroyed in the flood, where did the olive branch come from? Weren’t all the trees dead?
35
posted on
11/18/2007 1:57:27 PM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
("What are we doing tomorrow night?" "Same thing we do every night. Try to take over the world!")
To: anymouse
This timeline and “flood” correspond to the general warming period that we are experiencing now. The expansion of farming across Europe was just as likely because all of the sudden it got warmer. And, despite the folks who want our planet to be a uniform temperature, warm is almost always good, especially compared to the cold periods which have a tendency to last for 60,000 years.
36
posted on
11/18/2007 1:59:53 PM PST
by
dalight
To: stormer
I don’t base my empiracle evidence upon any give me by an Organization, I base it upon the simple facts!
37
posted on
11/18/2007 2:22:55 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
To: Tanniker Smith
All land-living animal life. Obviously fish and sea creatures were able to survive, and so are some forrests when they haven’t been submerged for long, or very deeply!
38
posted on
11/18/2007 2:24:26 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
To: stormer
Well, fish wouldn’t need to be saved.
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson