Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. report finds U.S. intel consistently wrong on China buildup
World Tribune ^ | Wednesday, November 21, 2007 | East-Asia-Intel.com

Posted on 11/21/2007 10:42:53 AM PST by maddog55

A congressional commission on China reported last week that U.S. intelligence agencies have failed to properly assess Beijing's military buildup and capabilities and were taken by surprise on key developments, including new submarines built in secret.

“The pace and success of China’s military modernization continue to exceed U.S. government estimates,” stated the annual report of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

“Indeed, on occasion the U.S. defense and intelligence communities have been taken by surprise, as in the case of the launching of the Jin class submarine by the navy of the People’s Liberation Army.”

The criticism was a slap at pro-China U.S. intelligence officials, including Thomas Fingar, deputy director of national intelligence for analysis, National Intelligence Officer for East Asia Lonnie Henley, a protégé of convicted China spy Ronald Montaperto, and Dennis Wilder, a CIA official who is now the National Security Council staff senior director for Asia.

“Several Chinese advances have surprised U.S. defense and intelligence officials, and raised questions about the quality of our assessments of China’s military capabilities,” the commission report said.

China also could launch up to 10 new Shang-class nuclear attack submarines by next year.

The Jin submarine, also known as the Type 094, is a new class of ballistic missile submarine. It was first photographed in the water in late 2006 moored in Xiaopingdao Submarine Base.

The submarine is believed to be equipped with 12 advanced JL-2 SLBMs with a range of about 8,000 kilometers.

“China’s defense industry is producing new generations of weapons platforms with impressive speed and quality, and these advancements are due in part to the highly effective manner in which Chinese defense companies are integrating commercial technologies into military systems,” the report said.

“Industrial espionage provides Chinese companies an added source of new technology without the necessity of investing time or money to perform research.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 11/21/2007 10:42:55 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Calling Nada Nadim Prouty. Please pick up the red courtesy phone.


2 posted on 11/21/2007 10:46:54 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Perhaps of interest.
3 posted on 11/21/2007 10:48:04 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

As somebody who was around when Nixon opened the door I could see this coming

DETENTE was another screwup

Him and Kissinger were foreign policy idiots


4 posted on 11/21/2007 10:49:00 AM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; Ax; ...

MI Ping


5 posted on 11/21/2007 10:49:14 AM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

It may be simplistic, but my understanding is that CIA really missed
the implosion of the USSR and the fall of the Berlin Wall.

No suprise if our intelligence operatives (despite the good ones that
labor in dangerous, unsung roles) would miss the build up of another menace.

I just hope we at least have some good intell that percolates out into
the public consciousness.

Like the leakers in the British military that let Churchill know that
the British were NOT keeping up with the Germans in the years preceding
WWII.


6 posted on 11/21/2007 10:50:42 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Re: Nixon and Kissinger being foreign policy idiots. This is the usual mistake of confusing stupidity with evil, repeated so often on this forum . . . There is an agenda to push world government, and those pushing it are not stupid, they are evil (I’m not sure Nixon fell into this category, but Kissinger surely does).


7 posted on 11/21/2007 10:51:31 AM PST by Iconoclast2 (Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I don’t know if you saw this but it’s pretty bad when DOD officials simply shrug their shoulders when asked who is manufacturing our military parts and equipment.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/15/AR2007111502120.html?hpid=sec-nation


8 posted on 11/21/2007 10:53:04 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
A congressional commission on China reported last week that U.S. intelligence agencies have failed to properly assess Beijing's military buildup and capabilities and were taken by surprise on key developments, including new submarines built in secret.

I have predicted this exact circumstance for more than a decade.  We'll be funding China until the bullets fly.  And those who made fortunes off trade with China will slip back into the woodwork like the human roaches they are.

9 posted on 11/21/2007 10:54:50 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Thanks Joe.

That site has consistantly NOT underestimated what the Chinese are doing.

...and this next site, let's folk know what the dangerous possibiliies are of letting it continue unchecked.

THE DRAGON'S FURY.

10 posted on 11/21/2007 10:55:48 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Government could function with only 50% of their current staffing AND if it could eliminate pc-ism and political patronage. BUT, I guess it is easier and more satisfying to continue to believe in the tooth ferry.
Real leaders are politically destroyed and incompetent wimps are encouraged by our present system. We are decaying within from and the stench is now noticable.


11 posted on 11/21/2007 10:55:54 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Our continuing Trade Deficit with China is just paying for their military. They bring their crap into the country, because it’s manufactured cheaply and take the monies to build that military.


12 posted on 11/21/2007 10:56:20 AM PST by Pistolshot (Never argue with stupid people, they just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

These morons all need to be fired and replaced by any number of FReepers who have been watching China’s build-up with alarm, most notably, our pard Jeff Head. He’s been saying this for years, and now we find out that our wonderful government is surprised???? Where have they been?


13 posted on 11/21/2007 10:57:41 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Delivering a dozen nuclear attack submarines in a single year seems fast, perhaps a little too fast for the Chinese.

Given the close defense business relationship between the Chinese and Russian governments (e.g., the Chinese have the money and the Russians have the systems), is there any possibility that Russian shpyards are building and delivering these submarines covertly?

Might go a long way to explain where some of the surprises to US Intelligence are coming from.


14 posted on 11/21/2007 10:58:46 AM PST by Captain Rhino ( If we have the WILL to do it, there is nothing built in China that we cannot do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Another reason why Duncan Hunter is someone we should be seriously looking at for president.

He's the only one talking about the China threat.
15 posted on 11/21/2007 11:00:56 AM PST by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

You called it correctly. Maybe you should offer your services to our INTEL groups.


16 posted on 11/21/2007 11:04:23 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Thank you George H. Bush, for normalizing trade relations with China.

Thanks also to the Clintons for selling off vital military technologies for campaign contributions.

And thanks to the current Bush for the recent military exchanges in which the chicoms get to roam US Navy vessles and facilities while denying us reciprocity in accordance with the agreements.

Just a few things to give thanks for theis weekend—while were still allowed to celebrate Thanksgiving.


17 posted on 11/21/2007 11:10:44 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Gee, ya mean its not a ‘slam dunk’?

Gosh, I’m just shocked....

(sarcasm)


18 posted on 11/21/2007 11:11:39 AM PST by Badeye (That Karma thing keeps coming around, eh Sally? (chuckle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
As somebody who was around when Nixon opened the door I could see this coming.  DETENTE was another screwup.  Him and Kissinger were foreign policy idiots.

The opening of relations with China wasn't a bad idea.  It was what took place long after Nixon and Kissinger were involved, that really screwed the pooch.

Just having a means of dialogue directly with China wasn't a bad idea.  It was the middle of the Cold War and we needed to offset the U.S.S.R.  Doing what we did since the 1992 time frame was what was literally criminal IMO.

Look at our approaches to the U.S.S.R. and China.  With Russia we kept a line of dialogue open, refused to trade with them while doing our best to stop the flow of goods, services and cash into the Soviet block, which resulted in a colapse of the U.S.S.R.  In 1992, we totally ignored the object lesson of how we retarded Soviet growth and brought it down, and implemented one of the most self-destructive foreign policy lapses in judgement in our nation's history.

Are Nixon and Kissinger responsible for the actions that took place in 1992?  No, George Bush the first and Bill Clinton the ass, were.  Congress wasn't any help.  It was a collective cluster f--k of American interests IMO, and blaming Nixon and Kissinger for what ultimately took place, is a little like blaming the inventor of the wheel for the damage of howitzers that have wheels on them.

Look at Nixon's utilization of foreign policy to play off China against Russia.  Then look at what we're doing today despite China and Russia having aligned against us.  Sorry, but Nixon was a sage compared to the idiots we have in office today.

Do you honestly think Nixon would have okayed our handing of missile technology and other strategic gifts over to China?  I sure don't.

19 posted on 11/21/2007 11:11:55 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I think it’s already too late to stop China, but it’s not too late to quite gifting it and enabling it.

I don’t know Jeff, it’s just baffles me to see what our leaders have done.


20 posted on 11/21/2007 11:14:15 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino
Delivering a dozen nuclear attack submarines in a single year seems fast, perhaps a little too fast for the Chinese.

Not really when you consider the price of metals and oil are through the roof due the Chinese using their glut of American dollars to buy up all the strategic resources they can get their hands on.

And it's not like they have a labor shortage over there....

They are working as fast as they can to become THE un-challengeable superpower in Asia. And they are doing with the help of gullible American consumers.

21 posted on 11/21/2007 11:19:43 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VOA

It’s not limited to just the CIA.. we need to beef up all of our intelligence agencies especially on the HUMINT side which went to hell after the fall of the USSR... The following also happened recently and this is the 2nd time this has happened.

Chinese Sub Pops Up Undetected in U.S. Navy Exercise
Submitted by Julie on November 10, 2007 - 11:11am.

Recently, when a Chinese submarine popped up undetected in the middle of a Pacific Ocean exercise, dangerously close to the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk, American military chiefs were left dumbfounded and red-faced, according to UK newspaper, Daily Mail.

When the Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, they take the security of the aircraft carriers very seriously. At least a dozen warships are used to provide a physical guard, and using advanced technology they are able to detect and deter any potential intruders.

By the time the Chinese sub surfaced, the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missles at the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk, a 1,000ft. supercarrier with 4,500 military personnel onboard.

According to senior Nato officials, the incident caused a sense of sudden fear in the U.S. Navy, as officials realized the seriousness of the encounter. The U.S. apparently had no idea just how sophisticated China’s fast-growing submarine fleet had become, or that they even posed such a threat.

Reportedly, one Nato figure said that the effect was “as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik”. The Sputnik, if you remember, was the Soviet Union’s first orbiting satellite launched in 1957 which marked the beginning of the space age and kicked off the space race.

The U.S. Navy’s brush with the Chinese Navy’s submarine occurred in the Pacific Ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan. The one sub was able to slip past at least a dozen other U.S. warships that were in place to ward off any hostile aircraft or submarines. Two submarines were also in place, along with other advanced technology, which also failed to detect the intruding watercraft.

The U.S. Navy and Nato are now forced to re-think their strategy, and reconsider the level of threat posed from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.

While China insists that the incident was a simple coincidence, others are not so sure about that. The run-in led to some intense diplomatic exchanges, with rattled American diplomats demanding to know why Chinese subs were shadowing the U.S. fleet.

Analysts believe that China was sending a message to the United States and the West by demonstrating their rapidly growing military capability to threaten foreign powers that might try to interfere in their own “backyard.”

As a citizen of the United States, it may leave you wondering if we are really as safe as we think we are.


22 posted on 11/21/2007 11:28:01 AM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“I have predicted this exact circumstance for more than a decade. We’ll be funding China until the bullets fly. And those who made fortunes off trade with China will slip back into the woodwork like the human roaches they are.”

I know it and that is what is so maddening about the entire situation. While the rest of Americans fight for daily survival to eat and get necessary things like medication and heat to stay alive, these people will be sitting in fenced in palaces listening to Jimmi Hendrix, smoking a J and eating some nice steaks.


23 posted on 11/21/2007 11:28:49 AM PST by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I had read a report at one time that addressed the issue of the world’s population and how much of that population lived within 100 miles of a sea shore.

At another time, there had been some incident that made it clear China was a growing threat, and that their subs could become a very big problem.

I surmised that a few well placed subs could produce a massive amount of U.S. casualties.

When I did this, I had a Navy guy respond that I didn’t know what the hell I was talking about. Why they knew where every Chinese sub was day and night, and not a one of them could get viably close to our shores without the Navy knowing about it.

We got into one of these, you don’t support the military and you don’t know your blank from a hole in the ground arguements.

Now this.

I don’t know what is more disconcerting, that we can’t know everything and acknowledge it, or that we think we do and won’t acknowedge the possibility that we don’t.

I’m leaning toward the latter.


24 posted on 11/21/2007 11:38:16 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maddog55; Jeff Head; Paul Ross

I have not been surprised. And it probably comes as no surprise that for the past 6 years, Panda Huggers, Red Team idiots and other TRAITORS (THAT’S RIGHT.... THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE IN THESE GROUPS ... TRAITORS! ALL OF YOU, TO THE LAST MAN!) have been sliming me for telling the truth.


25 posted on 11/21/2007 12:01:42 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Whenever your foreign policy is dictated as per rioting college students and that policy is appeasement, you are gonna get screwed. Sometimes it just takes longer to feel the penetration.


26 posted on 11/21/2007 12:26:48 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Sending all our scrap metal to Japan doesn’t mean a thing. It’s all a part of doing business, opening trading channels to Asia, and making a buck. Oh, wait a minute. Wrong country, wrong century. Never mind.


27 posted on 11/21/2007 12:28:50 PM PST by Gritty (Liberals are always fighting the last battle as the current battle is too frightening-Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

“As a citizen of the United States, it may leave you wondering if
we are really as safe as we think we are.”

That’s a constant concern.
And that Chinese sub “pop-up” surely looks like a danger sign.

I hope all the voices of concern from the US Navy are more about
mis-information. And that the folks LET the Chinese sub in close for
gathering information (sonic signature, nice photos up-close of
the sub, maybe even other sensing methods not known outside some very
small and covert circles of the US Military).

If the Chinese had the sub surface near the US ships to get a “photo-op”
for the big-shots in Beijing, it was should be a short-lived time
of rejoicing for the Chi-coms. Now the US Navy knows about a problem
and will be working 24/7 to rectify the situation.

That sub incident might just be “what the doctor ordered” for keeping
a military sharp: “equal doses of humility and fear”


28 posted on 11/21/2007 1:43:41 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Nixon opened the damn door to trade PERIOD and helped drag them into the 20th century

That led to getting spys into the country

And his DETENTE was S&%$canned by Reagan .His China policy should have been also


29 posted on 11/21/2007 1:47:30 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Thanks for the additional comments uncbob.


30 posted on 11/21/2007 1:58:26 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I agree with you totally.

Everytime I hear somebody interview that bloated, pompous, overblown gasbag Kissinger, I get steamed.

We created the Frankenstein facaing us and it started with Nixon, better yet - Truman. McArthur was right.


31 posted on 11/21/2007 2:00:35 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Everytime I hear somebody interview that bloated, pompous, overblown gasbag Kissinger, I get steamed.

Especially when he tries to take some credit for winning the Cold War

I still remember when he was pushing Nixon's DETENTE

That BLEEP came out and said the Soviet Union was going to be on the winning side and it was up to him and Nixon to get the best deal possible for the USA

I didn't know whether to cry or scream
32 posted on 11/21/2007 3:56:13 PM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; SmithL

{{ping}}


33 posted on 11/21/2007 5:45:29 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

We’ll school these clowns just like we did the USSR.

Provided we have the cojones to do it again. Which, sadly, I’m unsure of.

If we do, go ahead and put me on the section tracking party.


34 posted on 11/21/2007 6:08:31 PM PST by Doohickey (Giuliani: Brokeback Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
It's not that we are unaware of where they come from.


35 posted on 11/21/2007 6:17:57 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

This has got to be crap.

It doesn’t even take a government analyst to put two-and-two together to guess China will use some of that new found money to upgrade and build-out.


36 posted on 11/21/2007 8:19:09 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47; jahp; LilAngel; metmom; EggsAckley; Battle Axe; SweetCaroline; Grizzled Bear; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
”Made in China” Ping.

(Please FReepmail me if you would like to be on or off of the list.)
37 posted on 11/22/2007 4:38:56 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
And those who made fortunes off trade with China will slip back into the woodwork like the human roaches they are.>/i>

My fantasy is they are in China when the crap hits the fan and they are rounded up and shot and their families are Fed Exd a bill for the bullit.

38 posted on 11/22/2007 4:43:29 AM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I think a blind man could see what’s going on.


39 posted on 11/22/2007 4:45:56 AM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
And those who made fortunes off trade with China will slip back into the woodwork like the human roaches they are.

My fantasy is they are in China when the crap hits the fan and they are rounded up and shot and their families are Fed Exd a bill for the bullit.

40 posted on 11/22/2007 4:48:13 AM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
I think a blind man could see what’s going on.

Mo one is blind. Everyone, pro & con for dealing with China knows what is going on. Greed is controlling many people.

41 posted on 11/22/2007 4:50:09 AM PST by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Thought you might find this interesting.


42 posted on 11/22/2007 5:21:49 AM PST by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: am452

Well, that might be fitting. That won’t happen. None the less, they will answer for what they have done. Judgement day comes for us all.


43 posted on 11/22/2007 8:53:29 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2

It’s comforting to know that other recognize evil when they see it.

Happy Thanksgiving


44 posted on 11/22/2007 10:06:08 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: caisson71

>We are decaying within from and the stench is now noticable.<

If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers – normally good Americans, but Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free, Americans who have been lulled away into a false security.

- Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This


45 posted on 11/22/2007 10:08:29 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

http://blog.barofintegrity.us/2007/09/04/duncan-hunter-interview-with-hugh-hewitt.aspx
Duncan Hunter Interview with Hugh Hewitt

(snip)

People say you can’t be tough on China because they are so big. I say you can’t ignore China because they are so big. And because of what they are doing.

I watched their military build up. They are building up at double digit pace right now. They are building lots of submarines, buying lots of high end fighter aircraft from the Russians, building about 100 short range ballistic missiles a year. China is stepping into the super power shoes that the Soviet Union left. Now we can have a good relationship with China; but it will have to be a relationship based on American Strength. I think Ronald Reagan proved that to us in our era of conflict and competition with the Soviet Union.

Hugh Hewitt: How many years have you chaired the Armed Services Committee?

Duncan Hunter: I have chaired it for four years. I’ve been on that committee for 26 years.

Hugh Hewitt: And does the Pentagon understand China? Do they come forward and do they talk on the record with the Hill about what China represents for the next generation?

Duncan Hunter: You know this last report on China actually received lots of criticism from the State Department because it was very candid about assessing this enormous growing military strength of China. The assessment of the Pentagon was they are doing so much more then they have to do for self defense. They are building an offensive capability. When they shot that satellite out of space on January 11th, because America’s military eyes are largely in space, that really hurdled a new era of military competition between the U.S. and China in space. Like it or not, if you have to rely on satellites for movement of special forces or army brigades or marine corps divisions, you have to rely on satellites for that, and your satellites are in danger, you are in trouble. So we have our eyes, our military eyes [on China]. Plus a lot of our economic capabilities are reflected through our space apparatus. You have to protect that. We are going to have to spend a lot of money now and take a lot of effort to neutralize what is an aggressive Chinese policy in regard to space.

Hugh Hewitt: Let’s talk about the media and China. I asked you about this on the radio yesterday, how many questions have you had about China in the course of the Campaign. You have been on the trail for how long?

Duncan Hunter: We have had 4 congressional debates now and we have been out campaigning hard this entire year. We had one great question, I think it came from either Brit Hume or one of his team, during the Fox debate in the South Carolina, last question of the debate to me on China. I was able to give, you only have one minute answer, I try to be a master on the compact answers, I laid out that we have this cheating on trade which is stacking up billions to China and they are using this money to arm. This presents a long term challenge to the United States. Maybe not a direct threat; but a military threat is comprised of two things, capability and intent. They certainly are building a capability to cause us a lot of harm. And the intent of China is always difficult to understand.

Those tough old communists that ran the politboro are still running things. We see these generals make wild statements like, “We hope you value L.A. more than you do Taiwan”. That is a thinly veiled threat to nuke L.A. Then there will be a flurry of newspaper statements by people saying well, ‘general so and so didn’t mean it’. Well I hope general so and so is pretty far away from that nuclear trigger. Because that is a wild statement. You see those wild statements that came out of Yunnan Island where the American plane was shot down or was forced down, and the wild statements that came out of there diplomacy core after that were tempered by their trade people. But it shows us there is a element of leadership that is embedded in the Chinese hierarchy that is very aggressive, very anti American and very war like. It is difficult to know which element of the Chinese leadership is going to dominate the government in 5 years.

(snip)


46 posted on 11/22/2007 6:24:13 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1891445/posts
Pentagon: China Gearing Up for High-Tech Warfare


47 posted on 11/22/2007 6:27:09 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1913355/posts
China hijacks Google, Yahoo, MSN, Youtube...


48 posted on 11/22/2007 6:29:11 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1868847/posts
China: Pictures of DF-25 Missile Revealed For the first time (3-warhead MIRV medium range)


49 posted on 11/22/2007 6:30:26 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Well they’re either extremely stupid or they’re getting it wrong intentionally, because it seems pretty obvious to most informed Freepers here what China is up to.

Oh, and there is another option. It could be that they’re intentionally getting it wrong, and it’s just a coincidence that they’re also extremely stupid!

50 posted on 11/22/2007 6:35:09 PM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson