Skip to comments.PAUL v CLINTON: Here are the players in the political drama of 2008 (plus an update in the case)
Posted on 11/24/2007 1:23:28 PM PST by doug from upland
If I've forgotten some of the more important players, I'll add them to this list when I have the chance. This will at least get you started in becoming familiar with them.
UPDATE: an appeal has been filed with the California Supreme Court by Peter Paul's counsel, attempting to bring back Hillary and join her husband as a defendant in the case. That decision is expected in about late January.
(Sorry if I've made typos and errors in grammar.....cut me some slack.....my eyes are tired of looking at a screen 15 hours a day.)
Good presentation there.
Thanks, HAL. Hopefully, it will make it a little easier to understand. I’m working on some Frequently Asked Questions that I hope will help.
Great job Doug. Are you getting any traction as far as people picking up the ball on this and running with it?
I hear that the staffs of Drudge, Hannity and O’Reilly peruse FR daily. Are they picking up on this? This needs to be front page news nation-wide.
Thank you, doug from upland!
Some headway, but not enough. We are still waiting for a reporter and editor in the mainstream media with enough huevos to not fear the wrath of Hillary.
Many others are on the potential witness list, including Larry King, John Travolta, Diana Ross, and others.
Nice lineup. Thanks again for all of your hard work.
Again, thank you for your patriotism and courage Doug. America is fortunate to have you working for our freedom.
God Bless you!
See Washington Whispers, 4/8/2007, for more on what Kelly Craighead is currently up to, with “The Democracy Alliance”—read laundry machine!
Keep up the good work.
Sooner or later, she’s going down.
Now, I wonder if you could get your hillcap.org website to work in a browser other than Internet Explorer. Some of us use Opera and Firefix for security reasons.
And if someone knows it works in one of those, please post that, and I’ll look real hard to see why it doesn’t work for me, and never mention it again.)
Kelly was very active for Hillary in setting up Media Matters. It was set up to put her in the White House.
I would love to see BOR get on board and run with this. He can be quite tenacious in pursuing, what he believes, is wrongdoing.
Will Reggies’s wire tap get in here ?
Also, what other two videos disappeared ?
I don’t know what will happen with the wiretap.
Very nice flow chart Doug!!!!! Effective!!!
Thanks for the Who’s Who. It really helps. What a tremendous web of deceit in this case and in so many other cases surrounding the Clintons. May God bless and keep you, Doug. Your efforts are appreciated.
Peter had a tape of the July 11, 2000 conference call. On that call, which included Peter, Craighead, Levin, Rosen, and Wolfson (and others), it was acknowledged that the cost of the event would be over a million dollars. In the testimony in his criminal trial, Rosen swore that the costs were hidden from him and he had no idea. Treasurer Andrew Grossman had was in possession of $1.6 million of documentation from Peter, through legal service in the lawsuit, but still filed a third false report on July 30, 2001, claiming that Event 39 cost $401,000.
As of Aug 15, 2000, everyone knew that the event cost over a million dollars. Wolfson admitted it to the Washington Post. This crime has been perpetuated in broad daylight. Despite the fact that there was compelling evidence or Rosen having a false invoice created and hiding expenses, he did not have unique knowledge about the cost of the event. It will be interesting to see if the government goes after him for perjury after his deposition in this case. (Who am I kidding.....the Bush justice dept?)
Another tape was the Sept. 22, 2000 meeting with Bill Clinton as he stepped off AF-1 in Los Angeles. Bill indicating to Peter that he was looking forward to working with him. That tape went “missing,” despite the fact that it was taken under government subpoena.
I heard that Media Matters not-for-profit status is up for renewal next month. Is this true? If so, what are the chances that their license will NOT be renewed given all the scandals that have been revealed about them and their connection to Hillary?
Can we be so lucky as to get the IRS or the FEC interested in making sure this organization is shut down?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.