Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2007 3:50:22 AM PST by NCDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NCDragon
Clinton is sticking with women, as illustrated by the framing of the Lynch endorsement. Her political touchstone remains the Clinton era, as illustrated by the endorsement that followed from Barbra Streisand.
How many registered voters are there? 100 million? How many of those 100 million will say this:

I like the way Streisand thinks, so if she supports Clinton I'll support Clinton, too.

Out of 100 million voters, are there 10 people so unbelievably stupid as to be swayed by an endorsement from Streisand?

2 posted on 12/03/2007 4:02:14 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
designed to make a small gathering look large

The Clinton method distilled to its essence.

3 posted on 12/03/2007 4:14:05 AM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon

Susan who?


4 posted on 12/03/2007 4:14:11 AM PST by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
"Clinton arrived an hour late for this announcement. The candidate offered no apology to the 50 or so supporters who waited it out in a small, overheated room, designed to make a small gathering look large."

One thing that I despise about the Clinton's is that they stage these events and intentionally arrive late as if to show that their time is somehow much more valuable than that of those who would support them. It shows an incredible lack of respect...... yet the masses continue to lap it up.

5 posted on 12/03/2007 4:19:48 AM PST by deaconblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
Polling shows Clinton is having trouble connecting with male voters and is vulnerable on the trust issue.

LOL. Ya think!

6 posted on 12/03/2007 4:29:38 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
Lynch sounded sincere, but her comments lacked emotion or spark.

It's possible she was a little perkier an hour earlier. haha.

10 posted on 12/03/2007 4:38:11 AM PST by Sal (Is Senator Kyl trying to rehab himself from Grand Betrayer status? I hope so but don't trust him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
"Her comments lacked emotion or spark. And so did her follow-up remarks, which focused on healthcare, the one topic that should stir her passions. Write it off as one flat, interlude....."

I see. When Mrs. Clinton lacks emotion, she's flat. When Fred Thompson lacks emotion, he's lazy.

13 posted on 12/03/2007 5:02:13 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon


RUSH: Did you see Hillary? No sooner does Barack Obama announce that The Oprah is going to hit the campaign trail than Barbra Streisand announces she's going to go out for Hillary. Mrs. Clinton, I know you know Barbra Streisand. I know she's actually not a friend of yours. You kicked her out of the White House once when she was in there when you were gone. Remember that? Barbra Streisand was in the White House overnight in the Lincoln Bedroom when Hillary was out on some junket somewhere. But it's time to bury the hatchet on that because now Barbra Streisand is back as an endorser. Well, she may be a friend of yours, Mrs. Clinton, but she's no The Oprah. In fact, ladies and gentlemen, I have a poll here, the latest poll of Democrats since Oprah and Streisand were announced. It's an overnight flash poll. Check these numbers. Question: "Who would you rather have lunch with, Oprah or Barbra Streisand?" Answer: Oprah 80%, Streisand 20%. Next question in the poll: "Who seems friendlier and nicer to you, Oprah or Streisand?" It's Oprah 80-to-20 again. "Whose book recommendation would you read, Oprah's or Barbra Streisand?" Oprah 94%, Streisand 6%. "Whose political endorsement would you more likely follow?" Oprah, 60%, Streisand 10%. The other 30% laughed too long to offer an opinion.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: You know, yesterday on the Drudge Report, these two headlines consecutively listed are just a riot: "Clinton Relying on Elderly Women to Help Her Win Iowa." "Streisand Endorses." (laughter)
14 posted on 12/03/2007 5:21:17 AM PST by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon

Women also have an electoral history of turning against a female candidate 3-4 days before an election.


15 posted on 12/03/2007 5:24:38 AM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon

Clinton had a moment of truth? It must have been a mistake, oversight, one time error.


17 posted on 12/03/2007 5:35:36 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon
Hillary is just going through the motions of 'running' for office. She is SO sure she will be the nominee, she thinks she doesn't have to do much.

Please continue, it will make it much, much easier for us to send you back to NY.

18 posted on 12/03/2007 5:37:59 AM PST by Pistolshot (Never argue with stupid people, they just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCDragon; All

“most importantly” a mother.

So is slamming Oprah for having an abortion?


23 posted on 12/03/2007 12:11:38 PM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson