Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred????
1 posted on 12/20/2007 1:42:00 PM PST by Robbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Robbin

Did Romney give him some Franklins?


2 posted on 12/20/2007 1:43:17 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Mitt must have promised him something should he win. Ann Coulter last night said she figures the race will end up Romney v Hillary.


3 posted on 12/20/2007 1:47:22 PM PST by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
Why not Fred?
This is what Michelle Malkin said today:
Three other candidates–Duncan Hunter, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul– rank higher than Thompson in Numbers USA’s assessment of the candidates’ proven records on immigration and border security (as opposed to their election-year promises).
I agree with Michelle Malkin. So does Tancredo.
4 posted on 12/20/2007 1:47:33 PM PST by tompster76 (Amnesty: No aspirations of citizenship to illegals - ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Core principles?


5 posted on 12/20/2007 1:48:39 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Tanc appears to have bought into the mythical electability beast.


6 posted on 12/20/2007 1:53:05 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

This question was asked of Tanc in the presser, it was about the 2nd question.
The guy asking it had interviewed Tanc several times he said.
Tanc responded that Romney had basically said the right things in their conversations with each other.

I’m was disappointed to see him support Romney.
I think Tanc’s supporters that were there seemed not excited about it either.
I was just there as an observer of the process really...


8 posted on 12/20/2007 1:54:02 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred????

Duncan's at the same place in the polls as Tanc. Even if everyone supporting Tanc switched to Duncan, Duncan would still be in the low single digits. Don't get me wrong, I like Duncan, but I think Tanc is trying to sway opinion toward the candidate he likes best among the top three.

Why not Fred? Same reason, though it's less extreme. Fred may still have an outside chance. However, I don't think Tanc's endorsement of Romney will really hurt Fred's chances. People who support Tanc are going to have to hold their noses to vote for Romney. They aren't likely voting for him because they like him, but because they like his closest opponents less. If Fred starts looking viable again, I think most of the people supporting Tanc will switch to Fred on their own.

10 posted on 12/20/2007 1:58:00 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Romney the robot probably agreed to pay off Tancredo’s campaign debt.


12 posted on 12/20/2007 2:02:46 PM PST by cquiggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Why you bunch of whiny wimps knocking one of the few conservatives that has genuine integrity. Just because he doesn’t endorse your particular candidate he’s been bought off. Low lifes.


13 posted on 12/20/2007 2:08:56 PM PST by jwh_Denver (Free Republic: All Huck, All The Time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
This is December 20, 2007.

The nominee will be Rudy, Huck or Romney.

Tancredo made his pick.
15 posted on 12/20/2007 2:12:08 PM PST by elizabetty ("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him????

Given how Mitt does business, I'm guessing some money changed hands. A little quid pro quo goes a long way.

At any rate, I'm very disappointed in Tanc. Another political whore plying his trade.
19 posted on 12/20/2007 2:19:50 PM PST by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

This shows how disengenuous is the slamming of Romney, for his past positions.


27 posted on 12/20/2007 2:26:53 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him????

Five months is an awful long time for Romney to hold a position. Romney has probably flipped or flopped over to Tancredo's position. Hard to tell where he will be in five more months.

36 posted on 12/20/2007 2:45:00 PM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Hah! I was looking forward to Tancredo coming out for Fred Thompson and was sure he would.

Then, I was going to consider his support important.

HOWEVER, since he (very oddly) gave his support to Romney, I now declare that his support didn’t amount to much as it only would affect 14 people in the world.


41 posted on 12/20/2007 2:51:38 PM PST by altura (Go, Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

45 posted on 12/20/2007 2:55:36 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

This is the oddest endorsement yet...though Pat Robertson going for Rudy was pretty amazing.

I just don’t get it- Tancredo really seems to have integrity and I expected him to go for Hunter or Thompson. This is not a condemnation of Mitt- I just don’t see him on the same page as Tancredo.


48 posted on 12/20/2007 3:01:01 PM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

“Why not Duncan or Fred????”

Because Bay Buchanan, a chief Tancredo supporter, is an apostate catholic turned mormon. Mormon hate Huckabee, so the best way to stick to Huckabee is to endorse Romney. Logically, Tancredo’s endorsement should have gone to Thompson who is closest to Tancredo on immigration.

Oh, don’t let the talk about Thompson not being a top tier obscure the action. This was a mormon attack on a Baptist.


61 posted on 12/20/2007 4:00:54 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

Sorry world series bet from one civil master to another!
Just fun and games to most of these frauds!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1916469/posts

Esoteric Republican presidential hopeful Tom Tancredo made an offer to a fellow Republican (and it wasn’t newly minted Sox fan Rudy Giuliani):

[Tancredo’s] campaign called ABC News to issue this challenge: The Colorado congressman will drop out of the race if the Rockies lose the World Series — if rival Mitt Romney agrees to pack it in if the Red Sox lose.


72 posted on 12/20/2007 5:36:50 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rudy,Romney,McCain, Huckabee will send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin

“Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred????”

I’m afraid to think how weird this primary is going to get before it’s over.

Last week there was a group that did a ‘Christian’ survey of the candidates. They really came down on Mormonism and just very nasty about Romney (over the top, uncalled for). Tancredo refused to finish their survey because of it and wrote them that it was unfair and uncalled for. So either he was already on board with Romney or he perhaps he took a chance on Romney because of all the uncalled for religion snipping.

In other words, I haven’t got a clue!!


85 posted on 12/20/2007 7:21:26 PM PST by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
>> Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred???? <<

Why not Fred for the same reason it's illogical for him to endorse Romney. Fred Thompson supported amnesty prior to his "road to Des Moines" conversion on the issue and Tanc called him on it. For him to endorse Fred now would look just as awkward as his endorsement for Romney.

96 posted on 12/20/2007 10:08:26 PM PST by BillyBoy (Fred Thompson isn't the second coming of Ronald Reagan, he's the second coming of Stephen Douglas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson