Skip to comments.
Tancredo video of Romney supporting Amnesty
michelle malkin ^
| 27 Jul 07
| michell malkin
Posted on 12/20/2007 1:41:59 PM PST by Robbin
Will be interesting to see how he squares his endorsement now with his campaigns criticism of Romney for supporting amnesty in July. -- Michelle Malkin
There is a link on her website to the video, I don't know how to include it.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; election; elections; romney; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred????
1
posted on
12/20/2007 1:42:00 PM PST
by
Robbin
To: Robbin
Did Romney give him some Franklins?
2
posted on
12/20/2007 1:43:17 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Robbin
Mitt must have promised him something should he win. Ann Coulter last night said she figures the race will end up Romney v Hillary.
3
posted on
12/20/2007 1:47:22 PM PST
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: Robbin
Why not Fred?
This is what Michelle Malkin said today:
Three other candidatesDuncan Hunter, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul rank higher than Thompson in Numbers USAs assessment of the candidates proven records on immigration and border security (as opposed to their election-year promises).
I agree with Michelle Malkin. So does Tancredo.
4
posted on
12/20/2007 1:47:33 PM PST
by
tompster76
(Amnesty: No aspirations of citizenship to illegals - ever!)
To: Robbin
5
posted on
12/20/2007 1:48:39 PM PST
by
Tarpon
To: Robbin
Tanc appears to have bought into the mythical electability beast.
6
posted on
12/20/2007 1:53:05 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: tompster76
OKAY, MITT BOY. the first person in my list was DUNCAN! I don’t by Numbers USA, they compare apples and oranges.
I rate Tanc and Duncan tops, but I put Fred way ahead of Mitt, and Paul is a Kook and doesn’t count.
7
posted on
12/20/2007 1:53:34 PM PST
by
Robbin
To: Robbin
This question was asked of Tanc in the presser, it was about the 2nd question.
The guy asking it had interviewed Tanc several times he said.
Tanc responded that Romney had basically said the right things in their conversations with each other.
I’m was disappointed to see him support Romney.
I think Tanc’s supporters that were there seemed not excited about it either.
I was just there as an observer of the process really...
8
posted on
12/20/2007 1:54:02 PM PST
by
HereInTheHeartland
("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
To: Diogenesis
Yes, because Tom Tancredo has proven that he is easily bought off on his most important issue, just like every good conservative is really just a huckster waiting for the big payoff — except of course you.
To: Robbin
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him???? Why not Duncan or Fred???? Duncan's at the same place in the polls as Tanc. Even if everyone supporting Tanc switched to Duncan, Duncan would still be in the low single digits. Don't get me wrong, I like Duncan, but I think Tanc is trying to sway opinion toward the candidate he likes best among the top three.
Why not Fred? Same reason, though it's less extreme. Fred may still have an outside chance. However, I don't think Tanc's endorsement of Romney will really hurt Fred's chances. People who support Tanc are going to have to hold their noses to vote for Romney. They aren't likely voting for him because they like him, but because they like his closest opponents less. If Fred starts looking viable again, I think most of the people supporting Tanc will switch to Fred on their own.
To: CharlesWayneCT
Perhaps also one must factor in that Romney is now a proven, exceptionally good liar.
11
posted on
12/20/2007 2:02:37 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Robbin
Romney the robot probably agreed to pay off Tancredo’s campaign debt.
12
posted on
12/20/2007 2:02:46 PM PST
by
cquiggy
To: Robbin
Why you bunch of whiny wimps knocking one of the few conservatives that has genuine integrity. Just because he doesn’t endorse your particular candidate he’s been bought off. Low lifes.
13
posted on
12/20/2007 2:08:56 PM PST
by
jwh_Denver
(Free Republic: All Huck, All The Time.)
To: cquiggy
I suspect there might be a few happy mormons in Tancs district.
14
posted on
12/20/2007 2:11:21 PM PST
by
proudpapa
(Thompson and/or Hunter.)
To: Robbin
This is December 20, 2007.
The nominee will be Rudy, Huck or Romney.
Tancredo made his pick.
15
posted on
12/20/2007 2:12:08 PM PST
by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Diogenesis
Not that good , Mitt the Panderer is getting caught in more lies everyday .
16
posted on
12/20/2007 2:12:58 PM PST
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Your friendly resident drive-by poster , it's for a great cause ! Stop the RINO's - VOTE FRED !)
To: tompster76
Three other candidatesDuncan Hunter, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul rank higher than Thompson in Numbers USAs assessment of the candidates proven records on immigration and border security (as opposed to their election-year promises). I agree with Michelle Malkin. So does Tancredo. Rankings are bunk. Some of the votes held against Thompson includes stuff like amnesty for Cuban refuges, which passed 99-1. Thompson did vote for some stuff like expanded foreign workers programs, but I support that too. I believe immigration is good if they are hard-working productive law-abiding people. Too many of the Mexican immigrants are drug runners and gang members and those suspected of such need to be booted out immediately with no questions asked.
To: elizabetty
The nominee will be Rudy, Huck or Romney. Fred and even McCain are still very much in the race. Right now there are 8 people in the country (3 Dems and 5 GOPers) with roughly equivalent chances at being the next President.
To: Robbin
Ok, what has changed since the 27 of July? Tanc was railing againest Romney over amnesty and now he endorses him????
Given how Mitt does business, I'm guessing some money changed hands. A little quid pro quo goes a long way.
At any rate, I'm very disappointed in Tanc. Another political whore plying his trade.
19
posted on
12/20/2007 2:19:50 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
To: jwh_Denver
20
posted on
12/20/2007 2:21:02 PM PST
by
captnorb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson