No.
Much as Buchanan would like it to be, the race is still wide-freaking-open.
Pat who?
Huck you Pat.
Hey, Buchanan, it’s ESTES Kefauver, not Ernest.
I agree Giuliani was stupid to not seriously contest Iowa. That has put him behind in even Florida. You have to scrap all the time if you want this job.
As much as I disagree with most of what Pat says he may be close here. But looking at daily Rasmussen poll numbers it still looks pretty wide open. Mitt and McCain are ahead of Rudy now.
Rasmussen poll numbers
12/20/07
13% Rudy
21% Huck
12% Fred
15% Mitt
15% John
“And though he seems ideally suited to the party,...”
I was just thinking the same thing. How is he not in the lead? I mean, the GOP candidate doesn’t get the nomination?
Pat has turned out to be a real fruitcake. The Republican race is wide open Pat. Get a life.
It ain’t over by a long shot. Remember, Pat gets his paycheck from the mainstream media.
How much bang for the buck do you think Ron Paul will get from his fast growing energetic base and record breaking campaign fund? I think this is new ground. Predictions like this seem more like damage control and steering tactics not mere observation.
buchanan is a curmudgeon.
Why do I think that if this article was about Fred having any kind of chance it would be getting more positive reviews? :)
I like a lot of things about Fred and I’m definitely not overwhelmed by Huck, but I think those people who are still convinced Fred is going to turn this thing his way are delusional.
In many ways, I would like to be wrong... but I don’t think I am. Time will tell.
At least everyone is now on record here! We can all check back in a few months and see who really knows what they’re talking about! :)
The funny thing to me—and no one can say Buchanan is wrong about this!—Mitt should be doing much better given all the money he has spent. That his numbers aren’t higher are shocking.
Anybody else at least agree with that?
Yawn....lol...I don’t like Pat..never have...
Just for comparison...last year both twerps...I mean...J F’in Kerry and Slick Edwards were polling in singles digits and ended up 1 and 2 when the dust settled....
Yup, I a seem to recall voyers lying to the pollsters last couple of elections....hmmm.
Hmm, and it seems before 2004...Iowa was one you *didn’t* want to win....kinda like being the Heismann Trophy winner going to the bowls...
That’s like asking if it’s down to Milli or Vanilli.
Did anyone here read the article...most seem to be Pat bashing out of context...
I don’t agree with Pat on foreign affairs but generally do on domestic.
do folks just spout the correct answer or do they think?
(not you DJ...i know you think)
Yikes.
Pat is a great American. All his books should be required reading in America’s HS classrooms. I don’t agree with everything he says, but he stimulates thought.
Pat is a great American. All his books should be required reading in America’s HS classrooms. I don’t agree with everything he says, but he stimulates thought.
If those two jerk offs are the best that the Pubbies can come up with, they deserve to lose. Slick WillieII Vs. Peanut CarterII. A bad joke!