Posted on 12/20/2007 9:17:57 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
Romney Fairytale running in Iowa on Fox News Channel
MEDIA ADVISORY, Dec. 20 /Christian Newswire/ -- American Right To Life Action, a new 527 political organization, is running its first political television ad statewide in Iowa starting today and through the Iowa Caucuses on January 3, 2008. "We have tested this ad with focus groups," said Steve Curtis, president of ARTL Action, "and it has everyone laughing, laughing with us, at Mitt Romney for being such an obvious liar about the most important issue for any leader in America: abortion."
Romney Fairytale Script
Once upon a time there was a man named Mitt who said a very bad thing:
Romney: "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country"
Then he thought of campaigning in Utah and said something different. "I am NOT pro-choice!"
But when he came back to liberal Massachusetts:
Romney: "I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose."
Then in 2004 he magically became pro-life, but only six months later:
Romney: "I am absolutely committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to law related to abortion and choice."
The spell must have worn off.
Now he's on the campaign trail again, and he's back to being pro-life.
Romney: "I was pro-choice; I'm pro-life." "I changed my position" "I never said I was pro-choice."
Narrator: BR: Mitt Romney, willing to sacrifice children, lying for your vote.
Paid for by American Right-to-Life Action.
According to their website, ARTLAction.com, "American RTL Action exists to provide leadership in the fight to advocate enforcement of God's enduring command, Do not murder (Luke 18:20), especially in the realm of government. For decades, the pro-life industry provided campaign cover for pro-choice candidates by deceiving well-meaning pro-lifers. ARTL Action is determined to end that ability to mislead Christians into supporting those who defend various forms of intentional child-killing. When it comes to child killing, exceptions are a window to the soul. ARTL Action will throw open that window so all well-meaning people can see where a political candidate actually stands. At ARTL Action, we expose the liberal in the conservative."
The issue is judicial appointments. And, no one that cares about the issue should want some lying flip-flopper with a record of appointing liberal judges to the judiciary nominating judges to the Federal courts.
Why not cool the jets and let the process work itself out.
Huck is too weird.... way too weird... and way too slick.
Did you notice how these Romney haters never promote their own candidate. (if they have one)
They are only obsessed with tearing down Mitt Romney.
What a way to go thru life, caring more about destroying than creating.
It's ironic but he would be the disaster of a candidate a lot of people believe Huckabee would be. He is probably most unelectable candidate and couldn't be relied to keep his word if he did get into office.
Why on earth would I do that and risk this lying RINO becoming the nominee?
Romney actually McCain look a credible candidate.
Who do you want? Tancredo? He endorsed Mitt... Fred? He last endorsed McCain.... you are running out of choices.
To take a breath.... who do you want? Then support him. I am happy with Fred, Mitt, or Hunter.
In other words, he would not work to change the law.
You bet!!!
“Would someone tell me what Bush has done on the abortion issue that Romney has not?”
That would be the point I think. He did, and will do, zippo.
“Yikes - devastating. Its only a minor sneak preview of what we would see if Romney were the GOP candidate.”
The whole flip-flop thing will be brought up on the political side. Then you have to figure half of Huckabees supporters are rockbed Christians who won’t vote for Mitt because of Mormonism - leading to a schism there. That’s before we get to the huge cost overruns in Romneycare.
Seeing a human in a Cuisinart would be far more humane.
BTTT
Who talks like that? Freaking twist the King's English. Absolute to maintain status quo, sort of, with regards, but absolutely? Status quo in politics? What's he there for, to tidy up the carpet and keep dust off chairs?
He is the Govenor of a state which has no control over Federal law.
But Romney did have control over new things of what the state wanted to adopt and those things as Govenor he was able to veto!
Why are you trying to complicate it with you inundos!
In other words, he would not work to change the law.
Exactly!
Romney, and his supporters here at FreeRepublic, seem to be all spin.
Kind of reminds you of that person who said it depends on your definition of the word “is”, doesn’t it?
***
You tell me which governor of the state of the union was able to changed federal laws that came from the US Supreme Court?
SoConPubbie it looks more like your definition of the is sweetpea!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.