Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fuel needs limit China's combat ability
UPI Asia Online ^ | Dec. 28,2007 | ANDREI CHANG

Posted on 12/30/2007 5:02:56 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2007 5:02:57 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Just one reason I’ve never feared the Chi-Coms, they haven’t the heavy lift capabilities to invade the U.S.
Not enough to invade an island right off their coast much less half a world away.


2 posted on 12/30/2007 5:12:04 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Amateurs talk about strategy, dilettantes talk about tactics, and professionals talk about logistics.”


3 posted on 12/30/2007 5:12:47 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The question since 1949 concerning Mainland China invading Taiwan has always been:

“Can The Dragon Swim?”

This article seems to answer with

“Yes, but not for very long.”


4 posted on 12/30/2007 5:14:43 AM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s not as if China were not trying to close the gap between the petroleum supply they have and the stocks they want to have.

They are stockpiling right now. More than that, they are eying the possibility of simply absorbing a few locations into their hegemony, giving them the necessary supply lines to mount and continue a protracted conflict.

If the US leaves the Persian gulf, China will fill the vacuum. One more reason to stay in Iraq long beyond the end of the Bush Administration in early 2009.


5 posted on 12/30/2007 5:15:48 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Yeah, right.

Like China wouldn't close all the America-driven Walmart & Nike factories if it really needed the fuel.

Why do you think China is courting Iran and Venezuela.

6 posted on 12/30/2007 5:21:18 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Like China wouldn't close all the America-driven Walmart & Nike factories if it really needed the fuel.

Cha-ching! Why is it that people think that in the end, China will keep toy factories running instead of arm factories?

7 posted on 12/30/2007 5:27:20 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Any idea on China’s progress and development of a Bio-fuels infrastructure?

We can monitor tanker traffic and imports, but we probably can’t definitively gage bio-fuels.

8 posted on 12/30/2007 5:29:19 AM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

And if the US decided to throw a CVBG or two into the mix, then the Chinese would be cut down to a week (or less). However, the economic damage will have been done.


9 posted on 12/30/2007 5:34:21 AM PST by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

China’s economy is completely dependent on exports. They’d suffer more in a war than we would.

Also curious how people think the oil from Iran and Venezuela gets there in a war.

This is all leaving aside the article in question only addresses the PLAAF and PLAN.

The Taiwanese army is larger with more armor than German forces in Normandy in World War II. Somehow you’ve got to keep the PLA supplied while it’s fighting on Taiwan.


10 posted on 12/30/2007 5:34:29 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

There’s also the issue of what happens when all of China’s ports get mined.

Don’t see a whole lot of breathless articles from the Bill Gertzes of the world about PLAN minesweeping capability.

Because they don’t have much.


11 posted on 12/30/2007 5:36:23 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They could do it the old-fashioned way. How long would it take to conquer Indonesia?


12 posted on 12/30/2007 5:47:54 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( "Do well, but remember to do good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; TexasCajun

I was thinking somewhat on those lines. The problem with Taiwan, for China, is that they want to capture it with its condition as intact as possible. What good is a Taiwan to China, after a nuclear sand-blasting?

The same considerations may not hold good for China’s other military ambitions.


13 posted on 12/30/2007 6:08:16 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The time to threaten a move on Taiwan will be when the rats control Congress and the Presidency. When that happens I predict the US will shamefully toss Taiwan to the barbarians in exchange for face saving future promises.
14 posted on 12/30/2007 6:12:55 AM PST by Jacquerie (Restrict the voting franchise to those who pay income taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I know little to nothing of China's capabilities. I suspect, but suspicion is not fact. This is possibly the case of our intelligence, suspicion, but few facts. The dragon's lair could hold many secrets, both stolen and contrived, or reverse engineered.

The world should not have had to face China for another twenty to fifty years, but with the aid of the clintoons, I suspect China has mobilized, and continues preparations for the end game. The end game plan....I know not what China's end game is, but I suspect China has a plan for their planned end game. Most all nuclear nations do plan, for all foreseen end games. The next ten years will bring many surprises.

I will hope for manageable surprises only, from China. But again, China holds the dragon's lair. I pray the Eagle is up to the task, but should a clintoon, an obama, a richardson, an edwards, a biden, or a host of others, arrive in the White House in January, one year from now, the dragon will continue to reap the benefits, and maneuver a continuation of a One China policy.

15 posted on 12/30/2007 6:18:43 AM PST by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s a nice calculation, but pointless IMO. First, Taiwan is not that far from mainland (100-150 miles,) with half of the island wide open. Why to even talk about 6,000 km ranges if you need only to take off, wait a few minutes, drop the bombs and return? If long range bombers are used, they will carry 5 tons of fuel and extra 40 tons of bombs. Same with fighters - they’d be able to stay over the island until they run out of ammo, no need for a 1,000 km trip to the battle area.

Other posters already mentioned that if needed Chinese rulers will deny fuel to civilian sector, without any second thought. But far more important is that China is highly unlikely to start the war - it makes little sense, costs a lot, and will likely destroy Taiwan’s industry. As I see it, Taiwan and China will eventually peacefully unify just because both will change over time. It is already happening.


16 posted on 12/30/2007 6:22:44 AM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Remember how easily the Nazis moved in on Norway and Denmark. (Not saying it was easy, but it was easier than one would have predicted.)
The Chicoms could do at least as well in Taiwan. Just get their people into key positions and let traditional Chinese respect for authority do the rest. No nukes needed. Infrastructure intact, as in a bloodless corporate takeover. People wake up to new managers, just like the invasion of the body snatchers.
After all, nobody wants trouble. Not the moneyed interests, not the working stiffs, not the underclasses, not the foreigners, nobody.
If they do it right and use their napkins, it won’t be denounced in the UN, it’ll be admired.


17 posted on 12/30/2007 6:27:49 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( "Do well, but remember to do good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What is the total annual fuel consumption of the Chinese armed forces? A report published by the PLA General Logistics Department in 2007 says that the PLA forces saved 55,000 tons of oil in 2006, approximately 5.1 percent of their total consumption.

The assumption is that they openly publish all their real data

18 posted on 12/30/2007 6:27:50 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Completely Correct! The author, of this piece, has made an assumption. One can always count on an assumption to be correct, and without flaws.


19 posted on 12/30/2007 6:33:28 AM PST by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Just one reason I’ve never feared the Chi-Coms, they haven’t the heavy lift capabilities to invade the U.S.

Why would they need heavy lift capabilities to invade the US?

Consider how many young Chinese men of military age are in our universities and working in our tech industries on H1B visas. almost 1.4 million [US residents] were born in China (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2002)

20 posted on 12/30/2007 6:36:46 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson