Key point.
Posted on 01/03/2008 6:53:38 AM PST by Jim Robinson
He's pro life, liberty, gun, constitution, originalist judges, federalism, small government, low taxes, economic freedom, secure borders, strong defense, national security, national sovereignty, etc.
He's the most reliable conservative in the field and comes without the social liberalism, abortionism, nanny statism, open borders, gun grabbing, big government, big spending, big tax leanings and unstable knife in the back RINO baggage of Giuliani, Romney, Huckabee and McCain.
He doesn't cater to the global warming, socialized health care, or open borders/amnesty crowds. Just say no to all this liberal garbage.
With Fred, we know we're getting a solid, no-nonsense, commonsense pro life and liberty conservative who will defend the nation, secure the borders, defend the constitution, appoint originalist judges, defend the Bush tax cuts, work to simplify and flatten the tax code, keep social security solvent while providing alternative private accounts, reduce government and spending, and work to return states issues to the states. Imagine that.
In fact, he comes closest to being the conservative leader I've been praying for all these years. I don't know about you, but I think it would be great to be able to enthusiastically support and work for a true conservative candidate whose principles and convictions match so many of my own.
Also, he'll beat the socks off any liberal Democrat in the debates and during the campaign. The Democrat will be pushing to end the war and bring the troops home on some arbitrary date (ie, total defeat for us), pushing for universal health care, pushing to roll back the tax cuts and increase taxes on the "rich," pushing global warming, pushing comprehensive immigration reform (amnesty), pushing for gay rights, and for any and all manner of big government nanny state/socialist federal programs.
Fred will advance the commonsense conservative constitutional/federalist answer for all these issues, ie, "no." All of the other leading Republican candidates will try to outdo the liberal in pushing one or more of the "conservative" universal health insurance plan, the "conservative" solution to global warming, the "conservative" solution to immigration reform (amnesty), the "conservative" federal solution for education, the "conservative" solution to balance the budget (ie, this means tax increases rather than cutting government), etc., etc. Now, in all of the above sentences where I enclosed the word "conservative" in quotes, re-read them as "RINO.") In other words, the RINOs will compromise and give up the fight and give in to the liberals. They win, we lose.
He also recognizes that we are in a war between civilizations and that our very survival as a free and secure nation among free and secure nations hinges on defeating Islamic extremism and ending the scourge of International terrorism. The war must be fought to the finish, and fought to the total annihilation of organized terrorism. And, no, it is NOT the same as fighting crime. War is hell!
If I were a resident of Iowa today, I know I would caucus for Fred!
GO, FRed, GO!!
Fred in ‘08!
Go Fred Go!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks Jim.
Well said!
Well said, and I agree. Fred would be great. He needs to show a bit more passion though.
Fred is closest to Hunter. He’ll get my vote.
I have several friends currently living in Iowa whom I have encouraged to do exactly that!
bttt
Too little, to late, JR.
I suspect most of the voters have concluded he doesn’t actually want the job.
No disputing what you wrote, just noting he appears to have blown a golden opportunity. His ‘walking for President’ schtick worked til he declared himself.
Like you, I had high hopes for him, seeing a return to Reaganesque policies. But his choosen strategy made it far too easy for a liberal MSM to paint him as ‘disinterested’ at best, ‘lazy’ or ‘sleepy’ at worst.
If he fails to take a third place finish today, he’s done, stick the fork in him.
Maybe he would be interested in a VP slot....
Too little, to late, JR.
I suspect most of the voters have concluded he doesn’t actually want the job.
No disputing what you wrote, just noting he appears to have blown a golden opportunity. His ‘walking for President’ schtick worked til he declared himself.
Like you, I had high hopes for him, seeing a return to Reaganesque policies. But his choosen strategy made it far too easy for a liberal MSM to paint him as ‘disinterested’ at best, ‘lazy’ or ‘sleepy’ at worst.
If he fails to take a third place finish today, he’s done, stick the fork in him.
Maybe he would be interested in a VP slot....
Nail on head. Thanks, Jim.
Bump
No he doesn't. He's cool, calm, and collected, just what we need for Prez, not a screaming Me Me.
“He’s pro life, liberty, gun, constitution, originalist judges, federalism, small government, low taxes, economic freedom, secure borders, strong defense, national security, national sovereignty, etc.”
I guess this just isn’t enough for a lot of “conservatives.”
It is for me.
Thank you, Jim. For this and for allowing me to come to FreeRepublic daily.
bump!
I think there’s a strong possibility Thompson will grab the headlines tonight. A strong third and he takes the healines from Romney and Huckabee.
Sorry I just don’t believe he is as conservative as he claims he is.....
Thank you, Jim.
But for your site (and the persistence of its members), Fred would not have a fighting chance.
You have (and may yet more) actually change the country — not a lot of people get the opportunity to do that in this world -— especially the most powerful, best, country in the history of the world.
That is the only flaw I can think of in regards to him and his campaign. That doesn’t make him any less qualified, but perhaps a little more difficult to elect.
JMHO2
Yep.
He’s right on just about any issue you care to name...but he simply doesn’t give the appearance he actually wants the job.
Well, I don’t believe you exist.
From a FR Post from several months ago. Still true….
There are three GOP frontrunners. All are wonderful men, two of them are legitimate national heroes. But all have fatal flaws.
Let’s list them.
John McCain is a patriot from a patriot family. His father and grandfather – both of whom rose to the rank of four-star admiral – stood together on the deck of the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay when the Japanese surrendered. John McCain was the third successive generation of his family to graduate from the Naval Academy at Annapolis.
And he capped his fearless service to this country as a longtime prisoner of the brutal North Vietnamese.
John McCain is an American hero.
But he’s also a both-sides-of-the-street Republican who tends to mock conservatives more than he represents them. And, when Teddy Kennedy stood up to offer amnesty to every illegal alien in the country, John McCain was standing right there beside him.
That is the last straw. We’ve already had one Republican president who refused to defend the borders, we will not tolerate another one.
So McCain is out.
Rudy Giuliani is an outstanding man. His work cleaning up New York City, and then responding with inspiring leadership abilities in the wake of September 11, make him an outstanding candidate for president.
Unfortunately, he’d make a better Democratic candidate because his personal philosophies are far more consistent with the values of that party than the Republican Party.
Rudy is a liberal, plain and simple. And that just doesn’t fit with the philosophy and purpose of the Republican Party.
Which brings us to Mitt Romney. Less impressive as a leader, more impressive as an organizer. Mitt Romney’s strength is that he has created a superbly constructed and richly financed campaign. It is a tremendous asset and strength which might propel him into the nomination.
But he wasn’t a war hero, and the most notable aspect of his elective career – other than essentially socializing Massachusetts medicine – was failing to stop gay marriage from coming to his state.
My beef is that Mitt Romney seems to have been a certified liberal until he was 58 years old. Then he seems to have begun a public preparation for the presidency, including a miraculous and convenient conversion to conservatism. He has, over the last two years, reversed himself on almost all the big issues of the day. I just can’t get my mind around how a man of his age could so resoundingly change his world view.
Also, I think sometimes he doesn’t tell the truth. His account of his experience as a firearms supporter – claiming to have been a hunter all his life – seems to have been shown to be a fabrication.
So, Mitt Romney is not the guy for me.
Fred Thompson, however, he walks on water.
No, he’s not perfect. No, he’s not the second coming of Ronald Reagan.
But he is an unusually bright, gifted and experienced leader whose entire public life has been dedicated to being a genuine card-carrying conservative. He doesn’t believe that man causes global warming, he doesn’t believe in open borders, and he doesn’t believe in gun control.
He’s everything Hillary Clinton is not. Heck, he’s everything George W. Bush is not.
The Republican Party is on the verge of becoming pointless. It has so cynically sold out its core beliefs and supporters that it is now nothing more than a cheap copy of the Democratic Party.
George W. Bush has given us record deficits, a massive new welfare program, the attempted federalization of education, unrestricted illegal immigration, the right war fought the wrong way and now he’s a convert to global warming. Republicans gave him the White House and he gave them the shaft.
And they’re hankering for a little bit of the old-time religion, a genuine conservatism that is about something bigger than just winning the next election. In fact, real Republicans – like, presumably, real Democrats – see winning elections as a means, not an end. And while Republicans over most of the last 10 years have been good at winning elections, they have proven woefully inadequate at making those wins count for anything when it comes to advancing conservative policies that will help and strengthen America.
Which is where Fred Thompson comes in.
He is the last chance real Republicans have of getting a candidate on the ballot.
Which is why I hope he runs.
Which is why I hope he wins.
I hope alot of Iowans see things your way, Jim!
I'd give more, but my wife doesn't understand the importance.
I have a good feeling about Fred and his chances.
GO FRED GO!!!
I feel it's crucial that we have either Hunter or Thompson in that chair behind the "big desk". I sure hope the undecideds surprise the heck out of us!
And the others in this race? Either Attorneys, politicians or both as well, I believe. So where does a person find a REAL Sprite conservative?
FRED PING!
Indeed. Fred is the only one of the top candidates I can vote for. (I wish Hunter and Tancredo had done better)
ML/NJ
God bless you, Jim, for all you do and God bless all the freepers.
At least he's a d*mn sight better than Rudy McRomabee! (I, myself, would rather have Hunter but we go to vote with what we have)
Reagan had a better track record then Fred. Nevertheless, I just do not trust Fred. I like Duncan Hunter, but he has a snowball chance in you know where. So it looks like its Mitt or Mike.
LOL You’re a RootyBooster!
Was he a fake and a liar?
FRED THOMPSON is the only choice for a true Conservative. Iowa is the first round of a very long battle, which FRED intends to win or place, then move on on to round two, South Carolina.
FRED has not worked this hard to bail after Iowa. FRED has a plan...strong and steady, building to a peak at just the right time.
Anyone who calls themselves a conservative that does not support FDT is killing any chance to keep the WH in 2008. Hunter will not/cannot win and all other candidates are closet democrats or worse. Fred is not perfect but he is the best solution for this election and whoever cannot see that needs to put down the bottle.
Huge endorsement in my book.
Thanks as a fellow Fredhead.
See post 41
Issues
http://www.fred08.com/Principles/PrinciplesSummary.aspx?View=OnTheIssues
The first responsibility of government is to protect the American people, the homeland, and our way of life. Today we face the urgent threat of radical Islamic terrorists. Al Qaeda is committed to attacking us here at home, and wants to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to kill millions. We must never give them that opportunity. We must defeat the terrorists abroad, and that begins in Iraq and Afghanistan—the central fronts in this global war. We must show the world we have the will to fight and win. A weakened America - or an America that appears weaker - will only encourage further attacks. We must persevere. As Commander-in-Chief, the president must ensure the United States has the means to achieve victory. Presidential leadership requires talking to the American people about these stakes, mapping out a clear vision for success, and devising a comprehensive strategy for achieving it. I am committed to:
In a few short years—not a generation from now—a fiscal tsunami that could imperil our security and economic prosperity will hit our nation and place an unfair burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The tens of trillions of dollars in debt that will be accumulated over the next few decades will do immense harm to our economy. This burden is now estimated at $170,000 per person and $440,000 per family. Time is running out to address this looming crisis. We need market-based approaches to reform that guarantee benefits for those who need them and embrace personal responsibility and cost-effectiveness without raising taxes. Given the scope and urgency of this problem, and the burden it will place on our children, reform is not only an economic necessity, it is a moral imperative that requires action now. I am committed to:
The U.S. tax code is broken and a burden on U.S. taxpayers and businesses, large and small. Today’s tax code is particularly hostile to savings and investment, and it shows. To make matters worse, its complexity is a drag on our productivity and economic growth. Moreover, taxpayers spend billions of dollars and untold hours each year filling out complicated tax returns, just so they can send more money to Washington, much of it for wasteful programs and the pet projects of special interests. We need lower taxes, and we need to let taxpayers keep more of their hard-earned dollars—they know best where and how to spend them. And we need to make the system simpler and fairer for all. To ensure America’s long term prosperity and economic security, I am committed to:
Americans have the best healthcare in the world. Some, however, choose not be insured; others cannot afford it. Every American should be able to get health insurance coverage that is affordable, fully accessible, and portable. Coverage should meet their individual needs and put them in control. Those who propose a one-size-fits-all Washington-controlled program ignore the cost, inefficiency, and inadequate care that such a system offers. Access to affordable, portable health care can be made available for all Americans without imposing new mandates or raising taxes. Current government programs must also be streamlined and improved so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need. I am committed to a healthcare system that:
Our government is outdated, inefficient, and wasteful. It is often unable to perform even the most basic tasks our citizens expect. It is no longer enough just to want limited government; the American people deserve more effective government. Given today’s challenges, we cannot afford—and shouldn’t accept—anything less than a nimble, effective, and efficient government that is able to focus its resources on the important issues facing our country. It must be able act on behalf of the American people and our national interests in a timely manner. The key to competent government is strong, committed leadership from the top. The key to good government is good people who are well-managed and put the national interest first. I am committed to:
Strong families are the bedrock of our nation and our culture. They are built around the sanctity of life and the institution of marriage, which is the union of a man and a woman. To counter coarseness in today’s culture that oftentimes victimizes our children and undermines the traditional values parents want to instill, we must not only protect but strengthen the institutions of family and marriage. I am committed to:
Read Fred Thompson's Full Immigration Plan
The United States is a nation of immigrants. Throughout our history, legal immigrants have brought energy, ideas, strength, and diversity to our country, our economy, and our culture. This must continue. But in the post-9/11 world, immigration is more of a national security issue. A government that cannot secure its borders and determine who may enter and who may not, abrogates a fundamental responsibility. I am committed to:
A well-educated citizenry is vital to our security, our economy, and our democracy. Despite the tens of billions of dollars spent on education by Washington each year, and the hundreds of federal education programs now in place, our children are still falling behind, particularly in subjects crucial to the global economy in which we live. At a time when America is behind other developed countries in education excellence, the federal role in education is too intrusive and too bureaucratic, and has become part of the problem. State and local governments are closest to the parents, the kids, and the schools, and best situated to implement changes and innovations that best educate children. I am committed to:
Activist judges across the country seem intent on legislating from the bench to promote a culture of abortion, redefine marriage, and undermine families—in effect re-shaping the values of our entire society without the consent of the people. We need judges who recognize their role in our democracy is to interpret, not make, the law. I am committed to:
The energy challenges our nation faces today are real and significant. Our dependence on foreign sources of oil threatens our national security and puts our economic prosperity at risk. America must rise to the challenge and take the steps necessary to become more energy independent before this becomes a crisis. No one solution will solve the energy challenges we face; all ideas must be on the table. Greater energy security will enhance our ability to pursue our foreign policy and national security objectives. Increasing our energy independence and investing in alternative energy sources will also produce a healthier environment. And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring, it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. Overall, I am committed to:
Below you can download side-by-side comparisons of where the GOP candidates stand on:
Family Values Issues
2nd Amendment Rights and Crime
Securing America's Borders
Fiscal Responsibility
I strongly support the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is touted as a major crime-control measure. But some of the places with the strictest gun-control laws also have high violent-crime rates. Disarming law-abiding citizens does not prevent crime. The answer to violent crime is smart, effective, and aggressive law enforcement. The real effect of these gun-control measures is to place onerous restrictions on law-abiding citizens who use firearms for such legal activities as self-defense, sport-shooting, hunting, and collecting. I am committed to:
Your post is about why he’d be the best President. Alas, that doesn’t necessarily make him the best candidate.
When he entered the race, I expected him to make a much stronger showing. Whether the negative perceptions of him are fair or not, the fact is that he hasn’t been effective at countering them.
In calling him the best candidate, are you saying you think he can beef up his campaigning skills and win in November? or are you urging that we get behind the candidate best suited to be President, and forget about trying to predict who could beat the Democrat?
The argument for picking the best President is that there’s so much uncertainty in a January prediction about a November election. On the other hand, no one wants a kamikaze run. I see good arguments on each side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.