Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Posted on 01/09/2008 8:58:04 PM PST by pgkdan
Fred’s in the top tier now?
I posted this one first because polling shows that Immigration is the #1 topic of concern among SC Republicans and because several times during the second NH debate Fred attemnpted to make some of these points but didn’t get the time to really elaborate.
He is in my book. Third in Iowa, Second in WY and poised to win SC!
Fine Business! Go Fred ->>>
Huckabee is sucking up all the Christians voting with their bibles. So he is polling on top.
I’m not finding any mention of addressing the anchor baby situation, did I miss it?
Honestly, I’m not suprised. I can’t see how you can do anything about that situation without amending the Constitution. Fred’s people know that.
I am for Fred, he is the only one left that has any worth (Duncan is good also)
I heard Bill Crystal say that McCain finished 1st in NH and 3rd in Iowa, I almost pulled out my hair on the Iowa comment.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Huckabee is sucking up all the Christians voting with their bibles. So he is polling on top..........................
I am a Christian, but cant warm up to his Bush bashing.It`s disgraceful the way he talks about my President
bump
There's a lot more Christians against Huckabee than for him.
No, you didn't miss it. I don't think you can correct that abuse short of an amendment to the Constitution. Fred is focusing here on things that can be accomplished shortly after he's elected. These are issues that a President can have a strong impact on immediately...even with a hostile Congress if he's willing to take his case to the people.
Is he going to have a State Department and Trade Rep implementing a policy of US taxpayers supplying the BILLION$ for “opportunity” of Central and South America?
” I don’t think you can correct that abuse short of an amendment to the Constitution. Fred is focusing here on things that can be accomplished shortly after he’s elected. “
No, the notion that it takes a constitutional amendment to fix a problem that isn’t there in the first place is just that, a notion that was misinterpreted by a judge, not congress. The 14th amendment, as noted by it’s authors was never intended to be abused by illegal aliens. Fred was asked about this by Laura Ingraham. He didn’t have an answer. Plenty of constitutional scholars and lawmakers disagree with you.
So am I, and I apologize if you were sligted in the least by my statement.
But there are some people who just don’t delve into the past activities of people running for office and make their political decisions based on perceived commonalities or emotions.
What? Fred clearly stating his plans and polices AGAIN?
I want to know how he’s doing in the polls. What TV show was he on today? What did the pundits say about Fred?
Don’t bore me with positions and strategy. I want Fred kiss my rear end so I can vote for him...as long as everyone else I know is voting for Fred.
I don’t want a President with a clear PLAN! I want a President who’s had Botox!
All that's really needed is a Supreme Court that will enforce the 14th Amendment as written, and not as some activist judges wished it had been written. The 14th was completely turend upside down and made to mean precisely the OPPOSITE of what was intended by Congress and the States by the Supreme Courth in the wrongly decided Wong Ark case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.