Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Favorite son' Romney is best GOP choice in primary
The Oakland Press ^ | January 11, 2008 | The Oakland Press

Posted on 01/11/2008 6:13:28 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Logical me

Romney is just as sorry an individual as Hillary is as far as I am concerned. Worse actually. If he had an ounce of honesty in him he would be running as a dem and quit trying to hide what he is. Liberal POS.


21 posted on 01/11/2008 6:43:28 PM PST by A1 Southern Man (Fred Thompson , the one who can win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
That’s nonsense. This isn’t the United States of Massachusetts. I guess you’re suggesting that we should vote for a political whore? Nonsense.
22 posted on 01/11/2008 6:45:36 PM PST by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
We really need to push the Republican Party to work toward closing the candidate selection process to our own party where ever they can.

If this isn't one of the greatest lessons from these primaries this year (besides all polls and media support should be taken with a grain of salt!), I do not know what is. It is offensive to have liberal independents and Democrats picking our delegates and in the end our Republican party candidate. Absolutely offensive and wrong.

I don't care whom every last FReepers likes or dislikes as a candidate, to each his own, but having liberal Independents and Democrats voting in our primaries should outrage all of us.

23 posted on 01/11/2008 6:45:57 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth

“Jane Roe of Roe vs. Wade changed to pro-life. “

While she was running for office???


24 posted on 01/11/2008 6:46:31 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A1 Southern Man
Hummm? That's exactly the way I feel about Mike Huckabee.

Great selection of candidates we have this year....not!

sw

25 posted on 01/11/2008 6:46:53 PM PST by spectre (spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
I'm with Laura on this and always have been. I also very much like Fred and although many would not put these two together I would like to see them in the first and second tier of our executive branch. I just think Romney should this time around be the president and Fred VP.

Flame away if you must, but Mitt Romney is a solid leader.

26 posted on 01/11/2008 6:50:02 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

“SCOTUS is what is at stake in 2008 (among other things).”

Romney in Seven Words
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952384/posts

“Make all the promises you have to.”


27 posted on 01/11/2008 6:50:21 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The most serious problem facing the country at the moment is slowing economy, declining house prices, softness in job growth, weakening consumer confidence, record trade deficits with foreigners, and the plummeting dollar.

McCain does not understand dynamics of economy. He thinks cutting taxes but not spending will increase budget deficits. He does not understand that cutting taxes stimulates growth in the economy thereby resulting in net gain to the US Treasury. This has proven itself over and over starting with JFK, then Reagan and now Bush-43.

Huckabee has no background in economics. His college education consists of divinity college and he did not even graduate.

Only two candidates I see competent to handle economy for the better are Romney & Thompson. Romney has proven success in turning failing companies around and Thompson has the right ideas.

The question is, are the unwashed masses smart enough to realize who is best for them? I won’t hold my breath.

28 posted on 01/11/2008 6:52:15 PM PST by ajay_kumar (United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I’ll be voting Thompson come Tuesday no matter what any paper urges me to do.


29 posted on 01/11/2008 6:54:05 PM PST by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Strange that during the bitter Democratic primary, KOS (or other way out left wing groups) would urge the Democrats to cross over and vote for a Republican candidate who is by no means the most liberal. KOS is smart enough to realize that an endoresement from it would only hurt that candidate. Democrats must really be afraid of Mitt Romney winnibg and are getting desperate.

KOS surely is not afraid of a crazy like John McCain who has zero personality and lower likability than Hillary and the clown Mike Huckabee who might do okay in a tryout for a standup comic.

30 posted on 01/11/2008 6:55:36 PM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
A lot is at stake in 2008.

I saw Laura Ingraham on O’Reilly this evening and she said some extremely positive things about Romney. Laura said that Romney has actually managed a business in real life and was a Governor, something that is unique among the candidates. Laura also said that Romney has not been talking enough about his strengths. She mentioned the emerging markets of China and India and that we are dealing with complicated economic issues. Romney is the only candidate with international business experience who understands global markets.

I know the idea of economics can be a little dry and boring, but "it is the economy stupid." Anyway, that's my 2 cents!

31 posted on 01/11/2008 6:55:56 PM PST by khnyny (Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Congrats to Mitt on the endorsement!


32 posted on 01/11/2008 6:58:05 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

I agree with you. No flaming here. Typically, it is former Governors who end up being elected as POTUS.


33 posted on 01/11/2008 6:58:29 PM PST by khnyny (Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: spectre; kinghorse

Actually in the polls I’ve seen he does not seem poll so well among women in general. I would say that’s an area he needs to work on.


34 posted on 01/11/2008 7:02:09 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: spectre
BTW, McCain and his ex-wife are on very good terms, so I don't see the need to go there.
35 posted on 01/11/2008 7:03:16 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Sorry - no thanks. I’ll not vote for this opportunistic abortion-peddler. Morals for sale to the highest bidder.

I have soured on him for similar reasons ... I no longer see in him a principled individual. Rather, I see an opportunist who has stretched the truth too far and too often.

No way does he get my vote in the primary. I will vote for him if he is our nominee but I sure hope he isn't. In addition to the above, he is unelectable.

36 posted on 01/11/2008 7:05:26 PM PST by freespirited (Still a proud member of the Stupid Party. It beats the Evil Party any day of the week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

You are wrong there. Hillary has the highest negative rating of anyone, while McCain has the highest net favorable rating of all candidates (check Rasmussen). McCain has ‘zero personality’? You’re certainly entitled to that opinion but have you watched the debates?


37 posted on 01/11/2008 7:05:41 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: spectre; Norman Bates
Romney DOES poll well with women

If he polls so well with women, why are his state by state poll numbers so terrible??

If the election were today and he were the nominee, we'd lose some of the reddest states. Like Kansas. No major GOP candidate polls worse than Mitt.

I used to think this was solely religious bigotry, but I have come to the conclusion that it is more than that.

38 posted on 01/11/2008 7:09:09 PM PST by freespirited (Still a proud member of the Stupid Party. It beats the Evil Party any day of the week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
I know the idea of economics can be a little dry and boring, but "it is the economy stupid." Anyway, that's my 2 cents!

It's not dry to me :)It matters and he is amazing in his understanding of what we face.

We could do worse than put a very smart and decent man in the White House with a lovely first lady. We could have the First Laddie. Ugh.

39 posted on 01/11/2008 7:14:10 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Isn’t this the same Oakland Press that dropped Ann Coulter’s column after the Edwards incident?
40 posted on 01/11/2008 7:14:14 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson