Skip to comments.
Rasmssun: Romney 26% McCain 25% Huckabee 17%
Rasmussen Reports ^
| 01/12/08
| Rasmussen Reports
Posted on 01/12/2008 8:15:09 AM PST by GOPGuide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: MNJohnnie
I think you nailed it there. I’ve talked to several staunch Dems in my area and they have said they would rather vote for McCain or Giuliani than for Obama or Clinton. I went a step further and asked them if they’d vote for Thompson instead of Obama or Clinton, a couple of them admitted they’d seriously consider it. These are neighbors of mine and not stupid people, they’ve just been lifelong Dems - but, they’re beginning to see things more clearly.
21
posted on
01/12/2008 8:35:08 AM PST
by
PrairieRoot
(Here's hoping Global Warning extends the hunting and logging seasons.)
To: altura
I think Michigan is proportional, but with a cutoff at 15%, so Huck, Mitt and McManiac will be the only ones to get delegates.
Still, I am now interested to see what % Fred does pull in Michigan, he has not campaigned there or advertised at all and this was taken before the last Debate I believe -- so I am interested to see what would be responsible for his support doubling in the state.
22
posted on
01/12/2008 8:35:09 AM PST
by
commish
(Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
To: bill1952
23
posted on
01/12/2008 8:36:31 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: rintense
I may actually vote for Romney here in Michigan simply because I dont want McCain, and would love a brokered convention. Do you sense anything at all up there that might explain a Fred jump in the polls from 5 to 9%? Or do you think this might just be an outlier?
I know 9% is nothing to get excited about, but when a candidate doubles thier support in a week with no apparent mechanism it does raise ones eyebrows.
24
posted on
01/12/2008 8:37:18 AM PST
by
commish
(Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
To: commish
I think the debate helped him a TON. There’s also a problem here with illegals, and I think Fred’s firm stance on it also helped him. Not sure on the Romney thing yet, simply because I’m a Fred Girl. The problem is, independents and democrats are going to vote for McCain, which makes his numbers highly suspect.
25
posted on
01/12/2008 8:39:18 AM PST
by
rintense
(Thompson / Hunter 2008!)
To: GOPGuide
The Michigan primary allows for cross-party mischief. DemonRATs can walk in and vote for Republicans they think will be least electable. A vote for McCain will cripple the grassroots of the Republican Party. The grassroots Republican does not like McCain. He is too liberal. They will wave signs for the devil before they would wave signs for McCInsain.
To: GOPGuide
OLD POLL
“... immediately following the New Hampshire Primary.”
27
posted on
01/12/2008 8:40:25 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: GOPGuide; All
while McCain leads among Independents and others
LOL. By "others", don't they mean DEMOCRATS?
28
posted on
01/12/2008 8:40:45 AM PST
by
khnyny
(Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
To: Abbeville Conservative; asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; ...
In Michigan, Romney is viewed favorably by 71% of Likely Primary Voters. Mitt PING!
To: rintense
IMHO that’s the smart move. The race needs to continue into states where they still maintain the quaint custom of only allowing party members to pick party nominees.
To: mainerforglobalwarming
I guess I have to root for romney here. Maybe if he wins it hurts Huckabee and McCain in SC, and Fred gets it done there.Yup, that makes sense. If Fred can move up to third place, then it's off to a brokered convention and President Freddie Dalton Thompson!
31
posted on
01/12/2008 8:42:35 AM PST
by
Soliton
(Sarcasm is an educational tool)
To: GOPGuide
Michigan, like New Hamshire and Iowa, is another liberal state that allows Dims to vote (or caucus) for Republicans.
Isn't is nice the way things have ended up after decades of manipulating voting laws and regulations: Liberals get to choose the Republican candidate.
Of course, the opposite is also true: Republicans can vote for Dims. And Independents can vote for anyone. But, it appears Republican voters don't have the nads to fight back.
32
posted on
01/12/2008 8:44:30 AM PST
by
technomage
(Radical Islam gives me the urge to go to the bathroom and drop a big mohammed!)
To: vbmoneyspender
IMHO thats the smart move. The race needs to continue into states where they still maintain the quaint custom of only allowing party members to pick party nominees.
Absolutely.
33
posted on
01/12/2008 8:45:05 AM PST
by
khnyny
(Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
To: commish
Added note: this state is the worst when it comes to the economy and unemployment. It has been ravaged by companies leaving the state in order to stay competitive. And our ultra liberal governor has done nothing to keep them here.
I thought Romney's ads here were a good idea- focus on the failing Michigan economy and tout what he'd do to help. But it doesn't look like its working in the polls. I would guess the underlying related component to unemployment is health care. And I can see the sheeple wanting government health care because they are unemployed.
Michigan has really become one of the most liberal states. Its sad too because even West Michigan, a once hard core Christian conservative area, is becoming more and more liberal. I want to believe Michiganders will wake up. But the re-election of Jenny has shown me this state is doomed.
34
posted on
01/12/2008 8:45:22 AM PST
by
rintense
(Thompson / Hunter 2008!)
To: bill1952
35
posted on
01/12/2008 8:45:55 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
To: mewzilla
Wow, since one can register on the spot, then it is open.
Here the registration deadline is 30 days before the primary.
Going to be a lot of moonbats crossing to vote now.
Thank you to the party leaders who decided to punish states.
Great job of unintended consequences.
Although I’m sure they won’t give a damn, it is another reason why I will not send one cent to any national party or organization at all.
Totally FUBAR.
36
posted on
01/12/2008 8:48:02 AM PST
by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: rintense
37
posted on
01/12/2008 8:51:01 AM PST
by
bill1952
(The right to buy weapons is the right to be free)
To: longtermmemmory
No because with a Leftist habitual political appeaser like McCain vrs any Democrat the Left are in a win-win situation in regards to the General Election.
A long drawn out primary that produced a viable GOP candidate vrs Clinton would make the November General Election as Win-Lose situation for the Democrats, much better if they have acceptable candidates on both sides to control the outcome no matter what we peons do.
38
posted on
01/12/2008 8:51:34 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
To: altura
Michiganistan is a lost cause...
To: redgirlinabluestate
40
posted on
01/12/2008 8:55:34 AM PST
by
khnyny
(Clinton and Co. are the carnies of American politics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson