Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
Space and Science.net ^ | January 2, 2008 | PRESS RELEASE: SSRC 1-2008

Posted on 01/12/2008 10:24:01 AM PST by SamAdams76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last
To: SamAdams76

Any good general physicists out there?

Just wondering, in terms of all the planets, and their mass, and there periods of rotation, can we calculate how that all sums up in terms of where the center of gravity is of the solar system, and how far it is from the suns true physical center, and how the sun’s average rotation around that center of gravity is?

I’m kinda sorta willing to bet that it’s eleven years...

Can’t find it in my Flammarion...


121 posted on 05/25/2008 8:24:45 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Pike

“Hey, I hope what they’re saying is true.”

I don’t, except to maybe prove the AGW crowd wrong. Cooling will be bad on the food crops, etc. However, I think our global economy is better suited to deal with it than we were 200 years ago. However, there will be a learning curve and time to adapt to the changes that many will suffer I am sure.

And, looking at the late start to this sunspot cycle I think they could be correct. Not to mention that we are in a warm period that is longer than any recent (well, in the last 20 million years) warm period before an ice age. The big ones - with over a mile of ice over my house type.


122 posted on 05/25/2008 8:39:37 PM PDT by 21twelve (Don't wish for peace. Pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur
The guy may be right, but he doesn't have much credibility, even with AGW Theory skeptics who agree with his points. His biggest problem is that he comes across as self important and obnoxious. Read more here.

Read the comments at your link on Casey. Appears they are more pro Casey and are critical of the pdf article.

123 posted on 05/27/2008 9:05:58 AM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: mpreston
Read the comments at your link on Casey. Appears they are more pro Casey and are critical of the pdf article.

Okay, a father and son support Casey. Casey, in turn, has posted nice things on the son's blog. Yawn.

No one else posts anything, aside from a two line response by the blog owner and it's hardly supportive. No offense, but that's hardly overwhelming support.

Look, I happen to agree with Casey's arguments. Well, maybe not agree, but I consider them plausible, which is more than I can say about AGW theory.

I find Casey's press release where he's informed the White House, etc. of the findings of his "scientists" to be obnoxious, pretentious, and a rather complete turn-off. It's almost like something Leo-the-lame-brained-DiCaprio or Tim Robbins or George Clooney would issue, but without the celebrity.

If he would just try to inform without trying to pretend he's the head of some big think tank (and please donate) and someone with some kind of relationship with the country's political leaders, he would come across a lot better.

This is a classic case of the style of the communicator getting in the way of the message. He does not appear credible, which tarnishes his message. As one who would like to see more people consider the solar cycle theory, I find him irritating.

Given the responses on this thread, I think I've got company.

124 posted on 05/27/2008 1:34:10 PM PDT by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Oh, no, you know better than that.

As I told my mother in law -

after I told her that the data showed the earth was actually cooling, and she looked as if I’d just said that I shot her favorite puppy,

don’t worry, whether the earth is cooling or warming, the answer will ALWAYS be

Global Socialism, reduced lifestyle, stifling of capitalism, and increased control over the individual.


125 posted on 05/27/2008 1:40:17 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Note: from January.

Scientist: Forget Global Warming, Prepare For New Ice Age
FOX | 04/23/08 | Unknown
Posted on 04/23/2008 11:26:35 AM PDT by Froufrou
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2005850/posts


126 posted on 08/29/2008 2:48:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

You’d probably know better than I would.


127 posted on 09/01/2008 12:39:14 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson