Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of Conservatism? - 43 Mistakes and the GOP's Dobson's Choice
Sideshow Bob | January 29, 2008 | Sideshow Bob

Posted on 01/29/2008 11:55:19 AM PST by Sideshow Bob

There have been more than a few recent articles and editorials attempting to affix blame for the demise of the Republican Party. Peggy Noonan blames President Bush. Rush Limbaugh believes a McCain nomination will kill the party. However, even in a worse case scenario, the Republican Party will probably stagger along for several years much like the last decade of the Whigs. Conservative Republicans should probably be more concerned about the impending demise of the conservative movement within the party. Some individuals can be blamed more than others, but this folly has many fathers. The latest blow to conservatives has come from within – thanks to Dr. James Dobson and other egotistical evangelicals. Political doomsayers may be correct and it is likely too late to save the conservative movement in 2008. Conservatives can correct their path to destruction for 2010 and beyond, but only if they look back at recent history, recognize the actions and actors that have brought the party and movement to this point, and to learn from a long series of missteps and mistakes.

Ronald Reagan built a winning coalition of conservatives, independents and establishment moderate Republicans in 1980. A coalition of social, economic and security conservatives had come together to form a plurality within the GOP and wrest leadership of the party from the establishment, moderate GOP. The Iran-Contra scandal (Mistake #1) weakened the coalition and the moderate wing of the party regained control of the GOP (Mistake #2), which led to the election of President George H.W. Bush (Mistake #3).

While the elder Bush had adopted – albeit reluctantly – many conservative ideals, he and the moderate GOP leaders advocated a “kinder, gentler” approach (Mistake #4). Conservatives might have been content to take a back seat to moderate GOP leadership, but they read Bush’s lips and their support and enthusiasm for the Republican Party evaporated after the Bush tax increase (Mistake #5). In 1992 some conservatives were taken in by Ross Perot and his anti-establishment, anti-Washington message (Mistake #6). Others just stayed home (Mistake #7) and helped Democrats elect the Dope from Hope, Bill Clinton, with just 43% of the popular vote (Mistake #8).

The only positive to come out of 1992 was that it helped create an opening for an obscure, but brilliant Congressman from Georgia to lead conservatives to regain control of the Republican Party. Newt Gingrich reformed the three-legged conservative coalition and took an upstart innovative approach of leading the GOP from the House with a 1994 national congressional campaign platform – the Contract with America.

It is important to note that prior to the ’94 elections, Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole and other establishment, moderate GOP leaders scoffed at and were dismissive of Gingrich and the Contract. Dole and Senate moderates rode the Contract’s election coattails, but made it plain that the GOP Senate did NOT sign on to the program, was not obligated to it, reluctantly followed Gingrich's lead, and worked to water down each and every one of the Contract's provisions (Mistake #9).

By January 1996, Dole was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee (Mistake #10). Dole sought to convince Speaker Gingrich to fold up the federal government shutdown stalemate with President Clinton and allow Dole to lead the GOP via his presidential campaign.

Dole gave Gingrich the choice of single-handedly continuing the shutdown and fight with Clinton and the media with Candidate Dole seeking a different path from the House GOP or deferring to Dole's presidential campaign and resuming the conservative battle together with Gingrich’s friend Trent Lott to keep President Dole honest after the ’96 elections. Gingrich made the wrong choice (Mistake #11). Gingrich probably should have run for President himself in 1996 (Mistake #12).

We all remember what happened. By caving in and compromising on the shutdown, the conservative House leadership lost some of their ability to control their more moderate members (Mistake #13). Bob Dole lost (Mistake #14). Trent Lott built his own voice separate from the House (Mistake #15). And with no help from Lott & the GOP Senate and a Clinton veto looming on all conservative issues, Gingrich, Armey & DeLay focused too much of their efforts on the growing Clinton scandals (Mistake #16).

Gingrich was able to maintain order within the House even during the Clinton impeachment. But after the Senate RINOs failed to do their duty and convict Clinton (Mistake #17), the House moderates began feeling their oats (Mistake #18).

Then, the impact of the missing FBI files took effect. Allegations of marital affairs Gingrich and Hyde took their toll (Mistake #19). Seeing his conservative House coalition slowly diminish and Lott's desire to set on a different path, Gingrich stepped down as Speaker (Mistake #20). Then his presumed successor, Bob Livingston from Louisiana, was also taken out by a marital affair (Mistake #21).

House Moderates became emboldened and championed the lackluster Dennis Hastert as Speaker to muzzle Armey & DeLay and appear less confrontational (Mistake #22). This effort also helped to clear the agenda of party leadership for the 2000 GOP presidential candidates (Mistake #23). And in 2000, conservatives settled for the "compassionate conservatism" of George W. Bush (Mistake #24). Many conservatives stayed home, nearly costing Bush the presidency and actually losing GOP control of the Senate in 2000 (Mistake #25).

To be fair, conservatives should thank God everyday for W's leadership in dealing with 9-11. But Bush also squandered the opportunity to push the party and country to the right following that horrible event (Mistake #26). The GOP regained control of the Senate in 2002, but based solely on the country’s fears of Democrats’ inability to deal with national security concerns and not on conservative social and economic principles. Meanwhile, the House drifted further to the center (Mistake #27).

Conservative fears of repeating Florida 2000 helped Bush win reelection in 2004, despite the party's overall drift to the center. By now, any conservative elements in the House and Senate were in complete retreat. The moderates ruled the roost in both houses. RINO defections on the Iraq war (Mistake #28), wasteful earmarks (Mistake #29) and ethics scandals (Mistake #29) were now front and center for the GOP. The only conservative victories of 2005-06 were the confirmations of Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court. And it took a battle to defeat Bush on his nomination of Harriet Miers to do it.

By Fall 2006 conservatives had become utterly disheartened. Attempts to make the Bush tax cuts permanent stalled (Mistake #30), the continued treachery of Arlen Spector, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Gang of 14 (Mistake #31), increased dissatisfaction with George Bush and the Miers nomination debacle all caused conservatives to stay home in November 2006 (Mistake #32). And the GOP lost both the House and Senate.

Occasionally, the conservative movement can still rise up. The reaction to the Amnesty bill was encouraging. But other than that, conservatives have again been wandering in the wilderness. GOP moderates and RINO's have been resistant to allowing a conservative to assume leadership in Congress. And any potential conservative congressional leader has held back (Mistake #33), in part due to the extremely early start of the 2008 presidential race (Mistake #34).

And what did conservatives get for 2008 GOP candidates? Were there any Reagan conservatives who possessed all three legs of the coalition stool - strong national defense, social conservatism, economic conservatism?

Nope.

Instead, we got Rudy Giuliani. An autocrat who has little affection for social conservatives, but pledged to nominate strict construction judges. Whoopee!

Instead, we got John McCain. An angry RINO maverick who enjoys flouting social and economic conservatives AND even the GOP establishment to gain favor and positive reviews from the liberal media.

Instead, we got Mitt Romney, an uber-wealthy GOP establishment moderate. At least Romney panders to social and economic conservatives with recently discovered flip-flopped positions on issues of importance to those two factions.

Instead, we got Mike Huckabee – the Dope from Hope, part II. While he is just as slick and manipulative as Bill Clinton, Huckabee is nowhere near as smart.

Instead, we got Ron Paul, a true blue, libertarian nutbag. Paul has a few economic bona fides that have pulled away a few non-nut job libertarians. But I'm sorry, Dr. Paul is a kook.

Instead, we got the Obscure Four - Tom Tancredo, Alan Keyes, Tommy Thompson & Duncan Hunter. Tancredo & Keyes are single issue candidates. Tommy & Dunc are well-rounded politicians (especially Hunter), but they lacked the ability to have broad nationwide appeal.

Seeing this morass of blech, Fred Thompson entered the fray expecting to be the savior of the Republican Party and the conservative movement. Fred should have been that candidate.

Unfortunately, Dr. James Dobson and a few evangelical leaders decided to cut off their nose to spite their face (Mistake #35). You see, Fred's not a Bible thumper. Neither was Ronald Reagan. And like Reagan, Fred is a bona fide, all-around, federalist conservative. That wasn’t good enough for Dobson. And when Fred refused to kiss Dobson's ring of evangelical purity, Dobson went shopping for a candidate he thought he could control.

Flim Flam Huckabee seized on that opportunity. Huckabee played Dobson into thinking that Dobson could be a GOP kingmaker (Mistake #36). A handful of evangelical leaders blindly pushed Huckabee as a viable conservative (Mistake #37). The media, who knows a GOP loser when they see one, helped fan the flames of Huckabee's support. For a time, the scheme worked. Huckabee won Iowa (Mistake #38), but eventually the truth of Huckabee's Christian Socialism became evident to most conservatives.

But the damage had been done. Social conservatives were now spilt. Some had been taken in by Huckabee's class warfare (Mistake #39). Some had been taken in by the media's false depiction of Fred as a lazy campaigner (Mistake #40) and settled for Romney, Rudy or, worse, McCain (Mistake #41).

Added into this deceptive mix was the ability of independents and Democrats to participate in and distort the Iowa, New Hampshire & South Carolina Republican primaries (Mistake #42). Media darling McCain was back! McCain – the new Comeback Kid – was ready to lead....the GOP down to defeat. Meanwhile, Fred's race and the ability for the GOP to unify behind a Reaganesque conservative died (Mistake #43).

At best, the GOP could still end up with a George W. Bush-lite nominee like Mitt Romney. He will at least pretend to care about conservative ideals from his Country Club wing of the party.

At worst, the GOP could end up with John McCain. McCain, the perennial thorn in the GOP's side who was once touted as a possible VP running mate for John Kerry!

Who knows? It’s still remotely possible that none of the moderates and RINO’s still in the presidential race will win a majority of the primary delegates. Maybe a conservative nominee could still rise up in a brokered GOP convention. Maybe a conservative national congressional campaign like the Contract with America could still arise in time for the 2008 elections. But really, that’s a fantasy.

The reality is that conservatives will have to wait until 2010 or 2012 to reassert itself as the true and legitimate leaders of the Republican Party. The reality is that conservatives have allowed numerous people to make numerous mistakes which have led the movement to this precarious point. The reality is that conservatives and the GOP are now left with this Dobson's Choice of Romney or McCain. Pass the nose clips and prepare for the worst.


TOPICS: Editorial; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008campaign; 2008election; campaign; conservatives; dobson; fred; fredthompson; gop; jamesdobson; presidential; shadowparty; soros; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-487 next last
To: Sideshow Bob

Nice analysis but I think you missed an imposrtant mistake, let’s call it 32B, the GOP allowed the dhimms to gang-up on Sen. Santorum and defeat him in PA. A Crucial Error that.


61 posted on 01/29/2008 12:52:01 PM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
It depends on your prospective. Do you want the long steam train to “Carterville” or the bullet train. Either way that is the destination.

I would prefer to snap the general publics head back ASAP and move on. I can survive a quick trip, but a slow bleeding death will cost even the well prepared.

62 posted on 01/29/2008 12:52:03 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty; All

I don’t believe “conservatism” has a chance without the folks who are tired of the “bible thumpers”, except in your head.


63 posted on 01/29/2008 12:52:57 PM PST by britt reed (Any resemblance between what Mike Hucklebee says and the truth is purely coincidental.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sideshow Bob

An excellent accounting of how we got here. I am depressed and no longer watching any election coverage. I may or may not mark the box next to the ® this year. I hope we can dig out of this hole.


64 posted on 01/29/2008 12:54:00 PM PST by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankereb

I fully agree with you regarding evangelicals and how the MSM completely distorsts their views.

Dobson, however, is an idiot. Or rather, he’s politically stupid and full of self-importance and ego.

Dobson’s “Thompson is not a Christian” leak was designed to destroy the Thompson campaign, and it worked.


65 posted on 01/29/2008 12:55:00 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (At kaki metumtam, Rudy McRomnabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pa_dweller
I count 44 total.

***

I stand (sit, actually) corrected. I listed 44, but couldn't count them correctly.

66 posted on 01/29/2008 12:56:29 PM PST by Sideshow Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NavVet; Sideshow Bob; Huck
Hey I am one of those social conservatives (been a big focus supporter for years). I think Dobson's reasoning was essentially "do not take us for granted", kinda of the way the Democrats take Jewish and Black votes for granted. I personally cannot stand Huckabee as a candidate. My first choice was Hunter, than Fred, now Romney. I will vote for McCain if he gets the nomination (holding my nose). The single biggest issue for me is the upholding of the constitution (i.e. supreme court justices). McCain Feingold is a travesty that Fred also supported. He was not the golden boy a lot of conservatives made him out to be.

Sideshow, I understand your sentiments, but understand, if the republicans expect the evangelicals to show up and vote and shut up (which I do not think you are saying), then it will be disaster for all conservatives (a lot of social conservatives will stay home). Dobson in my open went to far, (basically saying, if not my way, I with hold my endorsement (the same thing Rush is threatening)); but none of these candidates except Hunter are totally conservative. I will vote for any pubbie at this point because I do not want one more liberal justice. We can survive a McCain or Huckabee presidency, but our republic needs conservative justices to turn the tide. Sorry about the length.

67 posted on 01/29/2008 12:56:54 PM PST by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sideshow Bob

ping for later.


68 posted on 01/29/2008 12:57:33 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
There is a huge distinction in my mind between a “Bible Thumper” and a true evangelical Christian, although many Bible Thumpers are a sub-set of E.C.s

There is a pharaseeitcal nature to Bible Thumpers.

69 posted on 01/29/2008 12:57:47 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (At kaki metumtam, Rudy McRomnabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sideshow Bob
What is a conservative? answer; It is a horse dawn by committee. Conservatives have different strands and we put those strands together to make a rope. Look at Nevada they are so conservative that gambling, prostitution, quickie divorces etc are all legal. Next door is Utah where they are so conservative that none of that would be allowed at all.Every once and a while it is time to reinvent yourself (that is politics). The mix of different kinds of Conservatives just isn’t working. We will have to rebuild. We need someone who is very creative and talented and we don’t seem to have that now. I think the Dem’s are in the same place too.
70 posted on 01/29/2008 12:59:05 PM PST by bilhosty (JNDAL IN '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
The MSM is a living, breathing force that is pulling/skewing everything to the left.

I agree. Ever since conservative talk radio and internet blew up, they have felt no need to pretend to be objective. The Right finally having a voice, made them feel they need have no compunction in showing their bias. And for as much as talk radio and blogs have done for the Right, they are still nowhere as influential with the majority of Americans as mainstream media.
71 posted on 01/29/2008 12:59:56 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: fatez

open = opinion (sorry)


72 posted on 01/29/2008 1:00:40 PM PST by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

as a matter of fact, if you are able to see beyond your box, neither all evangelicals are conservatives nor all conservatives, evangelical.


73 posted on 01/29/2008 1:01:45 PM PST by britt reed (Any resemblance between what Mike Hucklebee says and the truth is purely coincidental.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: britt reed

You’re right, but you might notice that I never suggested ridding conservatism of its secularists.


74 posted on 01/29/2008 1:03:30 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Reagan would have been the nominee with or without Carter. He almost unseated a sitting President, Ford, in the primaries.


75 posted on 01/29/2008 1:05:36 PM PST by Greg F (Romney appointed homosexual activists as judges in Massachusetts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PFC

The truth, though, is that we had no choice even then. It was Bush or McCain. When are they going to give us a real choice?

I’m hoping Romney will win it, surprise everyone, and save us from the RINOs.


76 posted on 01/29/2008 1:06:04 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: britt reed

Agreed. Your point is...?


77 posted on 01/29/2008 1:08:05 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

it took a Hugo Chavez to bring Venezuela a Reagan...well... they still have Chavez.


78 posted on 01/29/2008 1:11:36 PM PST by ari-freedom (Hillary wants to be just like Gov. Granholm except more evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Nominee, yes, President, no.

If Carter, or any other Dem, had done even remotely well in office at that time, they would have won reelection.

Watergate still burned in many brains as being a “Republican” issue. Carter screwing up so bad made a big difference in the final outcome.


79 posted on 01/29/2008 1:11:48 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

One day...


80 posted on 01/29/2008 1:12:19 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-487 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson