Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Do You Learn a Dead Language?
Slate ^ | Jan. 28, 2008 | Christine Cyr

Posted on 01/31/2008 10:15:54 AM PST by forkinsocket

Last week, Chief Marie Smith Jones, the only remaining native speaker of the Eyak language, died in her home in Anchorage, Alaska. Chief Jones' death makes Eyak—part of the Athabascan family of languages—the first known native Alaskan tongue to go extinct. Linguists fear that 19 more will soon follow the same fate. Fortunately, starting in 1961, Chief Jones and five other native-speaking Eyaks worked with Michael Krauss, a linguist at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, to document Eyak in case future generations want to revive it. How would you go about learning a language that nobody speaks?

It depends. A well-documented language would have a dictionary, grammar book, a body of literature (such as folk tales or religious texts), and, in some cases, videos and recordings that a dedicated student could learn from. Eyak, for example, has all of these. Ideally, the grammar book and dictionary would spell out the sounds of the vowels (and tone, if there is any). If there isn't good documentation, linguists must reconstruct the language using whatever written stories or religious texts remain, and then borrow words, grammatical structures, and pronunciation from closely related languages, patching together their best guess at what they think the language sounded like.

In some cases, a language that's classified as "extinct" is still spoken in certain contexts. Latin, for example, is considered extinct, or dead, but is taught in schools and used in religious ceremonies. A language is generally considered extinct if it's no longer used in daily conversation. To be a living—or native—language, people must use it as a primary means of communication.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Israel; Miscellaneous; US: Alaska; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alphabet; americanindians; cornish; epigraphyandlanguage; eyak; factsintheground; factsontheground; godsgravesglyphs; hebrew; israel; jerusalem; language; letshavejerusalem; linguistics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Beagle8U

4 the after-life??


21 posted on 01/31/2008 10:47:48 AM PST by kenavi (Save romance. Stop teen sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

That is one of the funniest things that I have read in a long time. Thanks!


22 posted on 01/31/2008 10:49:44 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Like conservatism?


23 posted on 01/31/2008 10:51:29 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Does speaking fluent drunkinese count as a language?


24 posted on 01/31/2008 10:57:54 AM PST by Niteranger68 (Either order from the menu or go open your own restaurant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

You’re most welcome. Because of your comment I decided to bump the thread. :)


25 posted on 01/31/2008 10:59:49 AM PST by Constitution Day (Ray Smuckles for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

The Vanilla Ice in Latin thread was also damned funny. I wonder what other pop music has been translated into Latin in a similarly humourous fashion...


26 posted on 01/31/2008 11:06:01 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

A case of all Chiefs no Indians.


27 posted on 01/31/2008 11:07:36 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket
Umm... Why, exactly, should we get worked up over a language "going extinct"?

Languages aren't some sort of noble end unto themselves, other than study for linguists.

Language is for communication. If you can adequately communicate your thoughts in a "living" language, what do others matter?

28 posted on 01/31/2008 11:10:24 AM PST by TChris ("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I’m sure it’s out there.

A cursory glance at YouTube and other sites shows that there are PLENTY of people out there with too much time on their hands.


29 posted on 01/31/2008 11:15:33 AM PST by Constitution Day (Ray Smuckles for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

A FReeper favorite!


30 posted on 01/31/2008 11:17:18 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

LOL...Never thought of that.


31 posted on 01/31/2008 11:18:36 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
But why would you want to learn a language no one else knows?

Military tactical communications?

32 posted on 01/31/2008 11:33:23 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TChris
If you can adequately communicate your thoughts in a "living" language, what do others matter?

That's like asking "why paint if you have a camera?" or "why make pictures in color if black & white will do?"

Language affects how - and even whether - certain ideas can be expressed (see the appendix to "1984"). At an extreme, one can expand one's own thought process by adopting another language, improving the toolset for conceiving and expressing ideas - even if only within one's own head. The notion of "can you adequately communicate your thoughts" is subject to self-restriction derived from not knowing if there is a superior form of communication, and not knowing if you're not thinking something because you don't have the semantic toolset needed to formulate ceratin thoughts.

There's a reason why Italian is preferred for opera, English for technology, Korean for literacy, Japanese & Chinese for calligraphy, French for romance, C++ for systems programming, Lisp for AI, etc. - each is better suited for certain categories of cognitive expression. There are great works written in dead languages ... beautiful expressions of notions which are lost because nobody understands them; more's the pity.

33 posted on 01/31/2008 11:35:22 AM PST by ctdonath2 (GWB wept for those who suffer. HRC wept for herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Hire a dead linguist?


34 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:08 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Korean for literacy? When the English language has the most beautiful and meaningful written works of all mankind?


35 posted on 01/31/2008 11:47:21 AM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1961451/posts - stop by and tell us about your screen name!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

English will be a dead language in the USA if Juan McCain is elected president.


36 posted on 01/31/2008 11:48:26 AM PST by HenpeckedCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Dead languages are worth learning if they have a literature--such as Latin or ancient Greek.

Cornish is a Celtic language formerly spoken in Cornwall, in SW England. It became extinct in the 18th century but apparently there are people today trying to revive it. Manx was spoken on the Isle of Man until a few decades ago when the last speaker died. It was related to Irish Gaelic. I suppose it would be useful if you had a Manx cat which refused to respond to commands in English.

A Romance language called Dalmatian died out in 1898 when the last speaker died. About 1% of the population of Switzerland speaks Romance dialects known as Rhaeto-Romance--they are so few in number it's thought that the language may eventually die out.

37 posted on 01/31/2008 12:24:20 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

Literacy in terms of how many can read/write. Written Korean is very easy to learn (nigh unto trivial), having (unlike most languages) actually been created by an accomplished linguist (the then-king around 1500). With just 24 phonetic characters, plus a simple syllabatic representation, it’s actually much easier to learn to articulate written Korean than to comprehend it.

This in contrast with English, which has an insane number of linguistic exceptions, phonetic variations per given symbol, hominyms, etc. being a cobbling-together of multiple languages.


38 posted on 01/31/2008 12:28:51 PM PST by ctdonath2 (GWB wept for those who suffer. HRC wept for herself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Literacy rate, then. Interesting. Thanks for the lesson.


39 posted on 01/31/2008 1:19:24 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1961451/posts - stop by and tell us about your screen name!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

It’d be interesting to know more about those native languages, their origins, and their relations (if any) to Asian languages. It’s a shame when a language like that dies out.


40 posted on 01/31/2008 3:13:02 PM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson