Posted on 01/31/2008 7:44:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON
More cities across the country are considered at high risk of a terrorist attack, according to a new list of funding priorities from the Homeland Security Department.
Last year the department made 45 cities or regions eligible for a competitive counterterrorism grant program. This year, the list has been expanded to 60 areas that can apply for the nearly $782 million available, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
The urban area grants are one of the department's most popular and most intensely debated programs. The department divides the regions at highest risk of a terrorist attack into two tiers. The seven highest-risk areas including Los Angeles, New York and Washington will be competing for about $430 million this year. The remaining 53 will compete for about $352 million. The department plans to release the list Friday.
The list has grown and shrunk in recent years, based on decisions the department says are not the result of specific threats or concerns but that reflect an overall analysis of threat data.
Some regions on the list in the past were dropped more recently. For instance, Albany, N.Y., was put back on the list this year after being dropped in 2003.
Other regions added to the list this year are: Rochester, N.Y.; Syracuse, N.Y.; Austin and Round Rock, Texas; Baton Rouge, La.; Bridgeport, Stamford and Norwalk, Conn.; the Hartford, Conn., region; Louisville and Jefferson County in Kentucky and an area across the Ohio River in Indiana; Nashville, Davidson County and Murfreesboro, Tenn.; Richmond, Va.; Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario, Calif.; Salt Lake City; San Juan, Caguas and Guaynabo, Puerto Rico; and Toledo, Ohio.
Every year, the list pleases and angers elected officials based on which cities are added or dropped. But this year, Congress insisted that the department include more cities.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee, said he is thrilled that cities from his state will receive counterterrorism money. Last year, there were no cities from his state on the urban area list.
Lieberman's counterpart in the House, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., is also pleased with the department's funding decisions, even though only a small area in Mississippi, near Memphis, is included.
But Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., criticized the department for spreading the money too widely.
"Strict criteria should be implemented to ensure that only high-threat cities" get money from the program, Lowey said.
Last year, Congress did pass a law allowing for as many as 100 cities to be judged worthy of such anti-terror funds, but said any grant money should be based solely on risk assessment.
Mayors of the biggest U.S. cities have long claimed the list should be pared down to funnel more dollars to those places at greatest risk; and mayors of mid-sized cities insist terrorists don't ignore them, and neither should the government.
Also Friday, the department is expected to announce transit and port security grants. New York and New Jersey will receive $43 million in port security grants, the highest of any port area across the country.
The Los Angeles-Long Beach port will get $36 million, and Houston and Galveston, Texas will get about $31 million. Connecticut, New York and New Jersey will get more than $150 million for transit security, while Washington will get about $39 million.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, said the funding to New York for port and transit has increased significantly in recent years, an indication the government is listening to lawmakers' concerns.
"Last year was the best year by far we ever had for funding, and now we're going higher," King said. "This is a real recognition by the department that New York is clearly the best when it comes to providing homeland security protection at the local, state and city level."
On Monday, President Bush is expected to ask, as part of his final budget request, for a total of $2.2 billion to help states and cities protect against terrorist attacks.
Bush will also ask for more than $12 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, a 19 percent increase over what Congress appropriated for these programs in 2008. This money would go toward building a fence along the southwest border and enforcing immigration laws, such as deporting illegal immigrants and holding businesses accountable for hiring people who are in the country illegally.
Illegal immigration has been a hot topic in both the Democratic and Republican presidential campaigns. Last year Congress failed to pass a comprehensive immigration bill.
The urban area grants are one of the department's most popular and most intensely debated programs. The department divides the regions at highest risk of a terrorist attack into two tiers. The seven highest-risk areas including Los Angeles, New York and Washington will be competing for about $430 million this year. The remaining 53 will compete for about $352 million. The department plans to release the list Friday.
--
I could go for a couple million to upgrade the bunker. I would think the bay area is high-risk .. try driving around here sometime
>>>$12 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, a 19 percent increase over what Congress appropriated for these programs in 2008. This money would go toward building a fence
The Alaska Pipeline is 800 miles long, took 3 years to build (plus two prior years for planning and 3,500 permits), and cost about $30 billion in 2006 adjusted dollars.
“$12 billion for border security and immigration enforcement” ain’t even close to doing the job.
Anyone seen any news footage on the “progress” of the fence in, say, the last six months or even the last year? Strange, the Pipeline was a regular news item back in its day.
And who exactly is “building” the fence? Seems like it would generate a big labor boom in the southwest. Anyone seeing that? Welders? Equipment operators? Truck drivers? Laborers? Anything?
First we have The Bridge To Nowhere. Now we have The Fence Built By No One.
Huckabee should be right on it. LOL. Hope you appreciate the humour.:)
That’s Top Secret, but let’s just say it involves a three-legged race and egg toss.
How do I get in on the ‘competition’ to be the greatest potential danger zone?
Double-chili hot dogs just prior to a road trip in a small car with friends.
At least that’s what friends tell me.
biggest no brainer in the history of civilization and everyone lacks the balls to do anything about it.
well anyone with a chance to.
pathetic!
Competing? How exactly does one compete at this?Maybe you have to show them your carbon footprint.
Bush will also ask for more than $12 billion for border security and immigration enforcementSorry but there' no longer any reason to trust him...I'll have to see his definition of "immigration enforcement" before I fall for that one...again.
Play the part of ‘We are the weakest and most defenseless city in the nation so give us more money’ part? That’s easy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.