Posted on 02/04/2008 7:20:15 PM PST by Brian_Baldwin
I said he’s the worst of the RINOs. I’d cast a vote for an authentic Democrat in the general instead of a trojan horse Democrat pretending to be a Republican. If his record in Massachusetts doesn’t demonstrate he’s a Democrat in practice and in end results, nothing does.
It's interesting that a man who has close ties to John McCain is funding a PAC, called, Trust Huckabee, which ran the push polls for Huckabee in Florida.
In case you don't know who Charles Lindner is, maybe this will remind you(now he's into carbon trading, as in McCain/Lieberman):
The Keating One,' and Carl Lindner From 1981—the year before John McCain ran for U.S. Congress—until the early 1990s, the former Navy pilot was totally beholden to junk bond swindler Charles Keating for his political fortunes. When the S&L scandal exploded and Federal prosecutors were breathing down Keating's neck, it was McCain who tried to bully Federal regulators into backing off. While the affair became known as the "Keating Five" scandal, none of the other members of the Senate and House implicated in the ethics violations, were as closely tied to Keating as John McCain.
And Charles Keating was no "loan assassin." He was but one player in a larger organized crime apparatus that ran the $200 billion-plus rip-off, in what may have been the biggest actual RICO (racketeering) scheme ever.
Between 1959 and the late 1980s, Charles Keating was the business partner of Carl Lindner, the Cincinnati, Ohio-based financier who would be one of the central figures in the $200 billion S&L rip-off. In 1959, Lindner and Keating co-founded American Financial Corporation (AFC). Keating served as the mortgage and insurance company's general counsel, and later as vice president.
Between 1974 and 1976, Lindner and Keating engineered a series of stock purchases and mergers with some of the leading figures in the Lansky crime syndicate—who had followed the Bronfman family recipe, and gone from "rags, to rackets, to riches, to respectability
Where the hell is the Huckster getting money to stay on til the end?
Mike Huckabee (R)
Former Governor from Arkansas
Huckabee’s 4th Quarter haul quadrupled the total that he had brought in the rest of the year, bringing his 2007 total to nearly $9 million. In the last three months of 2007 he collected $6.6 million, just before going on to win Iowa’s Republican caucus. But he’s struggled to win votes at the primary elections since then and still lags behind all remaining Republican candidates but one in the money race. The Baptist minister is strapped for cash as the candidates move through some expensive primary states.
Total Receipts: $8,986,532
Total Spent: $7,090,087
Cash on Hand: $1,896,446
Debts: $97,676
Date of last report: December 31, 2007
... and our Republic would have difficulty surviving in its current form under the presidency of any of the Democrats currently running (Clinton, Obama, and McCain).
My absentee ballot has already been cast for Mitt.
Hopefully, it has lots of company.
“True but watch the mccain shills in the media”.
Michael Savage said it best tonight, I’m paraphrasing but it was basically this:
“The BOYS in San Francisco and the BOYS in NY don’t like Romney” (decent family man, Christian) “they LIKE McCain, they figure they can ‘work’ with him”....
The problem here is that we have no Conservative currently running. The only vote a Conservative can make is for Fred or “None of the above.” They may be wasted votes on paper, but it’s the only one a Conservative can make without violating their conscience.
For all of who are wondering what long, complicated and intriguing story line would play out if we had a brokered convention. It would go something like this:
Huck:Ah...okay.
No problem here. Hope for Romney/Thompson 08
Yeppers
:)
That’s believable. Anything that goes against conservative principles you can be sure mccain will all be for it.
May I suggest the "fooler" is you.
No disagreement there!
The only vote a Conservative can make is for Fred or “None of the above.” ... it’s the only one a Conservative can make without violating their conscience.
One can't judge the conscience of others. Lots of people are struggling with their decisions. It's their vote and I will respect whatever they choose to do.
It’s been giving me great pleasure to hang up on McCain.
Stay warm,,I see your not the type to lock step.
“Chopping off both hands is a better alternative than voting for Romney.”
Hey Field, your medication is wearing off. Your rants are making less sense as they continue. Back on the “Meds” for the good of all.
When you say you were a FReadhead (as are many of us) and then write the “chopping off” thing, it is embarrassing.
Keep it civil, will you?
Never trust a liberal. His conversions are nothing but lies.
Lately he seems to be more of a McCain endorser than a candidate in his own right. Definitely doesn’t have a good thing to say about Romney but plenty of nice for McCain.
The $50 dollar abortions were court mandated. The Gay thing was court mandated.
Romney ain’t perfect. He’s changed some views. Why? Political expediency or actually saying what he really thinks?
But at least he tries to be conservative. As a business, free markets and capitalism is he knows. Very well. And if elected, he is beholden ONLY to the American people that voted him in based on his platform. Not McCain bought and paid for by the liberals who almost became a DIM twice. Not Huckabee who is a social conservative but believes gov’ment is good. And compassionate. I’ve been sold that bill of goods 8 years ago.
Lastly, look at Romney’s private life and family background. And then look at McCains. That tells the story of the man and who he is. More than policies and platforms.
Maybe a little respect might be nice. Just for the record, you much more resemble 100% certifiable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.