Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: US soldiers in Afganistan so poorly equipped they use Taliban equiment.

Posted on 02/22/2008 6:20:46 AM PST by HD1200

Tuned into the debate last night and this idiot Obama proved again does not have a clue.

He made the statement that US platoons are going short manned to Afganistan because a portion of them are being sent to Iraq. Then he said our soldiers in Afganistan are so poorly equipped they are using captured Taliban munitions!

I can guarantee you if this was the case the media would have been all over it months or years ago. Who is going to challenge him on this?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; imrankhan; obama; pakistan; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: PghBaldy
McGovern was a vet.

Obama is a "vet", too; he treats Rats.

41 posted on 02/22/2008 6:38:29 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Are there any transcripts available of last night’s debate?


42 posted on 02/22/2008 6:39:13 AM PST by mquinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
Apparently neither Obama or his wife have any advisers to keep them from saying something stupid when they deviate from the script

True but ya' know what? The sheople drooling like Pavlov's mutts everytime he wiggles his ears are immune to facts.

I caught some Ombama and he comes off with "half of Americans are homeless". Now I'm sure that there are many Amerincas that do not have first hand experience of this or any war but we all can see that our streets are for the mostly free and not clogged with homeless... not counting hippie infestations

43 posted on 02/22/2008 6:39:14 AM PST by NativeSon (off the Rez without a pass...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
here's the problem: he says it and no-one in the media takes him to task on it.

Where is the outrage from the Pentagon? Elected officials? Talk radio? John McLame?

He gets a pass on making things up as he goes along.

44 posted on 02/22/2008 6:39:47 AM PST by sofaman ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

re: AK 47’s; I disagree and I think the majority would say the M16 is superior to the AK47:

AK-47 Pros & Cons
Pros
The AK-47 is a very effective weapon with great power
It has a very high rate of fire
comes at a very reasonable price.
simple to operate, clean, and repair
reliable
Cons
Very loud noise
it’s heavy
not as accurate as most military rifles
any optics require special adapters
Many people don’t like the AK safety mechanism

M-16 Pros & Cons
Pros
It’s lighter,
more accurate,
more versatile,
allow numerous modifications to be made
such as mounting various uppers
Cons
The 5.56 ammunition
reliable with proper maintenance


45 posted on 02/22/2008 6:41:57 AM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
If some Spec Ops guys are occasionally using an AK, it is because they want to, not because they have to.

Exactly...spot on. Spec Ops will use the enemy's weapons so that they cannot be identified when firing the weapon.

But, when it does occur, they do this because that is their desire, not because there is any kind of shortage or ill equipping going on.

Obama, again, has shown himself at best to be wholly ignorant...and at worst to be an abject liar who will twist the facts to his own gain.

46 posted on 02/22/2008 6:42:18 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mquinn

re: transcripts.

Have to start looking for them.


47 posted on 02/22/2008 6:43:36 AM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
I can't speak for everyone, and I would not even try.
Its a long way until November and us conservatives can hope for a miracle.
At this time I can not support MCLAIM. One of the reasons I am so stong against him, is the way he treated the familys of missing soldiers. He was rude and basically told them to go to hell.
I certainly can't support O'Mama Or Hitlery & Slick, and I can't NOT VOTE (I don't think)I am not sure what I will do if MCLAIM is the republican nominee.
48 posted on 02/22/2008 6:44:53 AM PST by DeaconRed (We must make sure our Brave Military gets the support to Win This WAR. Not another Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Sadly, the Dims in the audience believed every word.


49 posted on 02/22/2008 6:45:58 AM PST by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Obama’s the hero of the WHINOs on FR.

So anyone who thinks John McCain doesn't deserve to be supported because of his democrat like actions for the past 8 years is a a Obama supporter.

I will vote for John McCain only because the parents of soldiers here have asked for that. If it was up to me I'd live through a democrat for 4 years in order to teach the republican party that when you can't tell the difference between them and democrats us conservatives are going to find another party.

I would submit that John McCain will get more soldiers killed in the next 4 years than either of the democrats. I'm afraid he would be much more likely to start another war because he's having a bad day. Yes they will bring the troops home but maybe it is time to kick the Iraqis out of the nest. And if the democrat president does this and Iraq turns into a failure they won't be able to blame it on "the failed policies of the Bush administration".

50 posted on 02/22/2008 6:46:06 AM PST by McGruff (Tribal name 'One whose back bleeds' or 'Many knives in back'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon
One of the goals of war is to capture the enemies supplies, munitions and using them against the enemy.

It's a lot cheaper than shipping the supplies and munitions across the ocean.

51 posted on 02/22/2008 6:47:16 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 ("It may take another Jimmy Carter to get another Ronald Reagan". Rush Limbaugh Jan. 14, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

If Obama knew ANYTHING about military history, he’d know that conquering armies are SUPPOSED TO capture the enemy’s weapons/munitions and (if appropriate) add them to their own arsenals.

Barack Obama gave the impression U.S.troops are using Taliban weapons because U.S troops don’t have weapons of their own. What a liar, what a jerk.


52 posted on 02/22/2008 6:48:25 AM PST by RooRoobird20 (Thankfully Convered Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

I have been all over the place on this subject but when it really comes down to it I simply don’t think I can willingly accept one of these nut balls as commander in chief, I just can not!


53 posted on 02/22/2008 6:49:42 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I dunno...I’ve shot all three and prefer the sturdier AKs. I know a number of military folks who do too. But, I guess it’s a matter of preference.


54 posted on 02/22/2008 6:53:17 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Here we go again. We had to fight like hell to keep those idiots Gore and Kerry out of the White House and now we got this guy who is probably worse than the previous two.


55 posted on 02/22/2008 6:54:11 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Barry is truly insane.


56 posted on 02/22/2008 6:55:44 AM PST by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

At last someone who was actually there.TY for setting this straight. It it sad when Obama, who has never served, much less has Obama ever had a shot fired at him- puts out this BS.


57 posted on 02/22/2008 6:57:40 AM PST by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

TSUN TSU man.


58 posted on 02/22/2008 7:00:19 AM PST by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

No fan of George McGovern, but the guy flew B24s over Germany in the Big One. Won the DFC IIRC. So please no comparison with Saint Obama.


59 posted on 02/22/2008 7:00:28 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I don’t take anything a liberal says at face value. Once you untwist their distortions and find the facts, the truth is generally much less damning, or not damning at all.


60 posted on 02/22/2008 7:01:02 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Scrape the bottom, vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson