Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Gives Up!
Vanity | 2/22/08 | DWPittelli

Posted on 02/22/2008 5:46:14 PM PST by DWPittelli

Hillary Clinton hasn't publicly conceded the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama, of course. But I have seen a significant new piece of evidence indicating that she has given up, that her actions show she is no longer acting primarily to win the election, but rather to position herself better if she loses. (Psychologically, her closing speech last night has been widely discussed as possibly hinting at the same thing.)

What's the news? She has sent out invitations to Massachusetts supporters that she will be in Boston this Sunday (Feb 24), holding a fundraiser dinner (a $5,000 per table “Conversation with Hillary” that is “In Support of Hillary Clinton for President”). Now she could hold a fundraiser just as easily in a state that still has a primary to come. But she is instead in Massachusetts because whatever differential in cash she can get by being in Boston instead of in Texas or Ohio (or Rhode Island, where she will be earlier in the day) more than outweighs the advantage she could get in votes by showing up in a still-relevant state.

The other interpretation of this news is that she's so broke that she must maximize income even at the cost of not being in relevant states with upcoming primaries. This is different, but almost as good news for Hillary's opponents to right and left – and almost as disheartening to her supporters. It is at least as telling on this score as the news that she has recently loaned her campaign $5 million of her "personal" money.

Most likely, both things are true: Hillary is now more interested in getting her $5 million back than she is in maximizing her chances of winning. She is no longer fighting for the nomination.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; dumbvanity; hillary; stupidvanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-273 next last
To: Clara Lou

Ah so somebody else got the impression she was begging for the #2 slot ?...interesting...I thought she was just too chummy with BHO and he seemed to pull back away from her as if to say he’ll make his own decisions...


101 posted on 02/22/2008 7:55:43 PM PST by billmor (God Bless Out Troops and Gold Star moms and dads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Supreme Court for decades to come and betraying the almost 4,000 Americans who gave their lives for victory in the Iraq War.

When it comes down to it - that's of primary importance. If either Hill/O get in - I truly believe we will be attacked again - they are waiting for someone weak - anti-war - to be in leadership. We know they are willing to die to crush us again.
102 posted on 02/22/2008 7:57:02 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
In my opinion, voting for a losing McCain is only encouraging the GOP further leftward

I'm with you.

103 posted on 02/22/2008 8:00:07 PM PST by The Citizen Soldier ("There is only one reason to be a Christian: because it's true" – Francis Schaeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billva

McCain won with few Republican votes and almost no conservative support. You think he won fair and square. I do not. By the time my state voted, McCain had sewn up the nomination. I had no say. I will not vote for McCain. I will vote for other Repubs. McCain will lose in my opinion. There is no real enthusiasm for McCain. He spent years stabbing conservatives in the back. Why should we support him? I see no reason to believe McCain will act in a conservative manner if elected. I have a very simple reason for not voting for McCain-McCain/Feingold.


104 posted on 02/22/2008 8:00:20 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: billmor

That’s stuff - who will be VP - is done behind closed doors. I don’t think she would be chummy in front of O to butter him up in front of all. She was just ‘trying’ to present herself differently, because the ‘other person’ didn’t work. And be agreeable for the ‘party’ - I think Jesse J came out and said that.


105 posted on 02/22/2008 8:00:26 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
I just want to watch Hillary slither away under some rocks.

She'll probably be in the Senate until she croaks.

106 posted on 02/22/2008 8:00:54 PM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: billva

I have no idea. Some like me are completely fed up and will go to the polls and vote for other GOP candidates-but not McCain. I think plenty will stay home and not vote at all which will be a disaster for the GOP in congress. Consider this, the country is closely divided apparently. If only a small percentage of conservatives stay home...the GOP will lose.

I could care a less about McCain, but I think it is a shame about congress.


108 posted on 02/22/2008 8:04:37 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
If we had a national primary day and you were able to vote and McCain still won the nomination, would you vote for him in the election?

No, I probably still wouldn't vote for him in the general because I do not feel that he is a good candidate to be President, for many reasons.

However, I don't think I would feel as resentful about the process - at least it would be more fair.

I've been a Republican for 34 years & I've worked hard for the party. I've made phone calls, bought 100's of bumper stickers and handed them out, put signs in my yard & place of business, had heated discussions with friends, neighbors & customers over my support for George W. Bush & others, have written letters to the editor, etc. I've voted in every single election.

But, the last two years have been revealing and heartbreaking for me. The party that I thought was great, and that I thought represented the little guy that gets up every day and does the best he can - that stood up for the life of an unborn baby, that wasn't ashamed to be patriotic and protective of our country........I don't recognize that party anymore....and I don't want to be a member of it anymore. I have no more loyalty left to give.

I think Ronald Reagan was the fluke in the party - the aberration - the exception to the rule. The rest of our leaders have been......mediocre, to say the least. They basically are a bunch of country club globalist elites that would do anything for the almighty buck - even if it means leaving our borders wide open so that they can have all the cheap labor and votes they can get.

Frankly, I don't care what happens to the republican party anymore - everyone respects John McCain because he is a "maverick" in his own party - but I'm a spoiled child having a tantrum when I choose to be a maverick.

Obama probably will win - most people I talk to really like him. They say he's young, articulate & "fresh". This was not a good year to trot tired old Hillary and McCain out.

I'm feeling distinctly "unwelcome" in the party anymore, so I'm just going to get out & be an independent voter.

109 posted on 02/22/2008 8:05:04 PM PST by alicewonders (The Republican Party - gettin' stupider and stupider.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
McCain is conservative on many issues but also quite independent and even liberal on some issues.

You don't see the confusion here?

I was thinking today how for the past twenty years McCain has declared himself a "maverick." No one could tell him what to do. Now that he needs conservative votes he wants us to all circle the wagons. Sorry, now I'm the maverick ...who will not be voting for McCain.

110 posted on 02/22/2008 8:07:35 PM PST by The Citizen Soldier ("There is only one reason to be a Christian: because it's true" – Francis Schaeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

The GOP should have learned their lesson in 2006-conservatives were not enthusiastic and the GOP paid the price as they will in 2008.


111 posted on 02/22/2008 8:08:04 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
McCain won with few Republican votes and almost no conservative support. You think he won fair and square. I do not. By the time my state voted, McCain had sewn up the nomination. I had no say. I will not vote for McCain. I will vote for other Repubs. McCain will lose in my opinion. There is no real enthusiasm for McCain. He spent years stabbing conservatives in the back. Why should we support him? I see no reason to believe McCain will act in a conservative manner if elected. I have a very simple reason for not voting for McCain-McCain/Feingold.

Geez it's just one big conspiracy with you isn't it?

Everything was rigged. Rigged for Rudy? Dang that didn't work did it?

So if the conservatives, as you describe them, are such a voting block just who did they vote for? Surely that person would still be in the running!

112 posted on 02/22/2008 8:10:03 PM PST by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: blackelkspeaks

You speak far more eloquently than I...I agree with every single word. If the McCainiacs are so sure they can win without conservatives then have at it. Why do you care what a ‘few’ conservatives do?


113 posted on 02/22/2008 8:11:43 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
I have no idea. Some like me are completely fed up and will go to the polls and vote for other GOP candidates-but not McCain. I think plenty will stay home and not vote at all which will be a disaster for the GOP in congress. Consider this, the country is closely divided apparently. If only a small percentage of conservatives stay home...the GOP will lose. I could care a less about McCain, but I think it is a shame about congress.

We lost Congress in 2006 and it had nothing to do with McCain.

114 posted on 02/22/2008 8:13:04 PM PST by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bannie
I agree. When the stake is in her heart good and tight I will call game over.
115 posted on 02/22/2008 8:13:33 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: billva

It’s not a conspiracy. I have no doubt RHINO’s believe they must have the ‘moderate’ vote to succeed. They set out to ensure a moderate candidate was nominated. The problem is the RHINO’s are wrong about this and will surely lose.


116 posted on 02/22/2008 8:13:53 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: The Citizen Soldier

Yes there will be emotional hotheads who will throw their little tandrums. I can’t help that. But elections are ALWAYS comparative choices. I will vote for John McCain.


117 posted on 02/22/2008 8:14:20 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: billva

When Clintons start being “nice” watch out! She won’t go down without a fight - this is her lifelong dream and its not something she would just “give in” on because of money. The other interesting thing about this whole election cycle is what it may do to Bill Clinton’s future speaking engagements. I think he has worn out his welcome with his So. Carolina remarks on Obama’s win and he’s been nothing but an idiot whenever he opens his mouth@ The best thing that could come out of this election is that Bill and Hill lose millions, lose the election, and lose their standing with the democrats!


118 posted on 02/22/2008 8:15:00 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: billva

We lost congress because the the RHINO’s behaved like big spending Dems and engaged in unsavory behavior. A depressed conservative base did not support the GOP who subsequently lost.


119 posted on 02/22/2008 8:16:09 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG
At least Hillary wasn’t out in front and center and ramming amnesty down the throats of the American people.

She is still flip-flopping on the issue last time I noticed.

On this issue, and an important one to me, Hillary wins. Albeit, narrowly.

Reminds me of the Dems “win at all costs” in ‘98.

They stuck with Slick Willie in ‘98 because they were more concerned about winning than doing what was right.

They lost all integrity and they knew it. “Oral sex isn’t sex?” “Depends what the meaning of ‘is’ is.” LOL.

This issue is more than just about “my ox.” The issue is bigger than that.

Great leaders in our history risked their “oxes” and fought for what was right. This is what made this country great.

120 posted on 02/22/2008 8:16:39 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson