Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Democrats should love the FairTax
Boston Globe ^ | February 24, 2008 | Laurence Kotlikoff

Posted on 02/25/2008 12:51:24 PM PST by Man50D

SUPPOSE A presidential candidate proposed taxing wealth and using the proceeds to reduce taxes on workers and provide a rebate large enough to cover taxes paid by poor workers. Such a candidate would be hailed by the left and reviled by the right.

Thus, it's remarkable that so many Democrats, with the exception of presidential candidate Mike Gravel, oppose the FairTax and so many Republicans, particularly presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, support it. In fact, the FairTax, which replaces all federal taxes with a federal retail sales tax and provides a rebate, represents a way to tax wealth, reduce taxes on wages, and disproportionately redistribute money to the poor.

A sales tax effectively taxes wealth?

It does. When we buy goods and services in a sales tax world, part of the payment goes to sales taxes. So we end up with fewer real goods and services.

Take Mr. Megabucks, who is sitting on $65 million and wants to buy a jet like Oprah Winfrey's - a 10-passenger, $50 million Global Express XRS. Under the FairTax, the jet costs him an extra $15 million because of the 30 percent sales tax. Mr. Megabucks gets the jet, but the extra $15 million, which he had budgeted for Beluga caviar, Dom Pérignon, and other flight snacks, goes to Uncle Sam.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; fairtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last
To: Bigun

I assume you have a link to the transcript of this in its original form?

or is it just another “rabbit out of the hat” ?


101 posted on 02/25/2008 5:12:18 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I assume you have a link to the transcript of this in its original form?

or is it just another “rabbit out of the hat” ?

You can start here:

Bill Archer 3rd para. from the bottom.

Now where are your anti FairTax economists?

102 posted on 02/25/2008 5:41:09 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

5.4 billion / 220 million = 24.55 hours (by hand, without modern software)
232 billion / 220 million = 1,054.54 $/hr - I don’t think so.
There is no “average taxpayer”
$60 (1920) = $662.31 today’s dollars

Just to hit a few points.


103 posted on 02/25/2008 5:41:50 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: groanup

A blog isn’t a transcript. Try again Mr Bunny.


104 posted on 02/25/2008 5:43:01 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

nonsense, you have people avoiding mere single digit sales taxes using the internet.

The same will be done as sure as night follows day when it is 23% or 30%.


105 posted on 02/25/2008 5:45:38 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
A blog isn’t a transcript. Try again Mr Bunny.

You wanted links, you got one. Now it's your turn to do some work jack rabbit.

I know Princeton Economics is a big word but try real hard, OK?

106 posted on 02/25/2008 5:52:07 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Read post #101, if you can, and try to let the poster speak for themselves for once, if you can, which I mostly doubt, unless , as per usual, you are trying to Jack the thread, which allways seems to happen when you're getting your butt kicked.
107 posted on 02/25/2008 5:59:35 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
The goofy-doofy fair tax dip$hits

Are you expecting us to retaliate so you can join your fellow income tax preservationists in accusing us of personal attacks? Or, more likely, are you just that common and uneducated?

108 posted on 02/25/2008 6:03:08 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: groanup

>> are you just that common and uneducated?

Yeah, that one.

Good-bye.


109 posted on 02/25/2008 6:06:12 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I read and answered post 101. I'm trying to figure out who cares about post 101. It has been answered and put away, thank-you very much. If you want to learn something look at the links I followed up with. Of course you want to learn something, don't you?

LOL.

110 posted on 02/25/2008 6:06:35 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

LMAO


111 posted on 02/25/2008 6:06:55 PM PST by Danae (Remember: Obama = Pull out from Iraq. PLAN on voting, or accept responsibility for the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: groanup

That effect is so obvious it’s painful. Who wouldn’t relocate to America if it became the most amped up tax haven in history?


112 posted on 02/25/2008 6:08:04 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Provide a link to the survey data or get your little buddy to retract the statement. No proof - didn’t happen - more FT smoke and mirrors.
113 posted on 02/25/2008 6:09:34 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

No proof, never tried, no hard data, pure speculation, 36 countries already better at it with flat tax systems.

Next?


114 posted on 02/25/2008 6:12:04 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Tatze
The author does not know the FairTax very well.
LOL! He is THE Fairtax economist.

Some think it's a barely known hick radio talk show host, but no, it's definitely Kotlikoff.

115 posted on 02/25/2008 6:13:47 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

You’re a businessman too, you know better and so do I.


116 posted on 02/25/2008 6:14:28 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I know better than listen to the snake oil, pitchfork and torch bunch. You should too.


117 posted on 02/25/2008 6:17:04 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
36 countries already better at it with flat tax systems.

What is your idea of a flat tax system? Has America ever had one?

118 posted on 02/25/2008 6:17:27 PM PST by groanup (Don't let the bastards get you down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: groanup

You still have a statement you backed to come clean on. You even going to try?


119 posted on 02/25/2008 6:18:43 PM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
The Tax Foundation says that for 2007 the number is $305.30 Billion. I'm not going to argue with them but you can if you want.

Total Federal Income Tax Compliance Costs, 1990-2015

120 posted on 02/25/2008 6:19:44 PM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson