Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Glenmerle
Face it: A lot of women just plain disagree with Laura. It's no more complicated than that.

That's cool. You're allowed to disagree with her all you want. The fact that you disagree with her, OTOH, does not mean that she's wrong

For my entry into this discussion: the marriage vows have each spouse holding a monopoly on the satisfaction of the sexual needs of the other. With that monopoly, comes a duty to satisfy those needs to the best of one's abilities. I hold that chronic refusal to satisfy one's partner's needs (as distinct from occasionally not feeling up to it) is as big a violation of the marriage vows as infidelity

423 posted on 03/13/2008 10:37:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

The reason behind the chronic withholding is the issue.

It’s a symptom of a deeper problem and it may be as simple as you flat out can’t stand your spouse anymore (for various reasons). Not condoning it....just saying “lay back and take it” will only make you grow to hate them if you simply don’t like them very much right then.


425 posted on 03/13/2008 1:00:44 PM PDT by najida (Your advice is like offering a Twinkie to Julia Childs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
I hold that chronic refusal to satisfy one's partner's needs (as distinct from occasionally not feeling up to it) is as big a violation of the marriage vows as infidelity

That assumes there is not some medical condition preventing one of the partners from participating in sex. . .right?

437 posted on 03/13/2008 2:01:38 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson