Posted on 03/21/2008 1:20:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Some 50 delegates were reportedly poised to unite behind Barack Obama if he had won by even 1 point in Texas. He lost the popular vote by 100,000 ballots, and now we learn that 100,000 Republicans voted for Hillary Clinton, probably not because of some change in party allegiance but because they thought she would be the easier candidate to beat. This kind of strategic voting often backfires (think Ralph Nader). The Texas crossovers are winners. By helping to prolong the Democratic race, they can claim credit for weakening the eventual nominee, whoever it turns out to be.
Obama has had a terrible time since Hillary sprang back to life after winning the Ohio and Texas primaries on March 4. The speech he delivered on race relations in Philadelphia was a valiant effort to address the story about his former pastor's inflammatory rhetoric. Having resisted for so long being typecast as the black candidate, Obama could no longer hold off plunging into the debate that still divides so much of America.
By most accounts, Obama did a masterful job aligning the promise of his candidacy with the grievances expressed by both blacks and whites, noting in particular how the anger of working-class whites over affirmative action and welfare formed the Reagan coalition. But the cable-news noise machine doesn't easily let go of something so juicy as the anti-American rhetoric served up by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The now-retired pastor did what the Clinton campaign had been unable to do--put Obama in a box he doesn't need to be in, one that brands him as a candidate primarily of black aspirations. The cable commentators kept pounding away, but in another universe, the one inhabited by Obama's base--the millennial generation--his Philadelphia speech became the most-viewed video on YouTube this week with almost 2.5 million hits so far. Maybe, just maybe, the cable critics and conservative pundits are talking to themselves.
At an election-watch panel Thursday morning organized by the American Enterprise Institute, a questioner using journalistic shorthand asked if the uproar over Reverend Wright "has legs." The consensus among the panelists was that Obama might have stanched the bleeding among Democratic primary voters but that the issue will continue to dog him in a more virulent form with questions about where his true loyalties lie. Is he American enough? He's new on the national stage, and people are prone to believe the negative campaign already underway on the Internet alleging various falsehoods. This belated scrutiny of Obama bolsters Clinton's argument that she's been vetted and there are no shoes to drop. You can almost hear her aides, sotto voce, saying "we told you so." Hillary's comment that it's "un-American" for Obama not to endorse a do-over vote in Michigan builds on the narrative that he's not one of us. She's got a point. The Republicans made John Kerry French; imagine what they can do with Obama.
The audience and even the moderator of the AEI panel seem startled when Norm Ornstein, a resident scholar with the venerable think tank, declared Obama the solid, even overwhelming favorite to be the Democrats' nominee. He ticked off what he calls "the fundamentals." Obama has won more states, more delegates and is 300,000-plus votes ahead of Clinton even if you add to the mix the disputed Florida primary she won. If her votes in Michigan were added--giving her a win in a state where Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot--the popular vote would be a wash. The moderator, Jim Glassman, was skeptical, and challenged the premise. What if Clinton wins Pennsylvania by 20 points? Wouldn't the superdelegates move to her because she has the momentum? Isn't that the whole point? "We're not there yet," Ornstein explained. "He would have to be bloodied far beyond where he is now" to justify awarding Clinton the nomination if she's lost the delegate count and the popular vote. Her campaign's inability to secure revotes in Michigan and Florida is a huge blow. The superdelegates are there to make sure the party doesn't commit political suicide. There are nine other states voting in addition to Pennsylvania--including North Carolina, the 10th largest state in the country, where Obama is favored to win. Clinton's path to the nomination is "doable but it remains an outside shot," says Ornstein.
Hillary has every right to stay in the race. If Obama's candidacy implodes, with or without her help, she'll be on hand to pick up the pieces. There will be more twists and turns before the race is settled by the superdelegates, probably some time in June. The news late in the week that low-level contract employees at the State Department had been rifling through Obama's passport file gave the cable noise machine something else to obsess about--on a subject that millions of Americans could identify with, government invasion of privacy. (Subsequent reports maintain that Clinton, too, had her privacy breached in a similar fashion.) Coupled with the coveted endorsement from former rival and current superdelegate Bill Richardson, Obama seemed once again on the upswing. Given the unsettled nature of the race and what's at stake for the party and the country, not to mention the Clintons, Obama should enjoy the respite. It won't last long.
I read an article today about why Obama wouldn't agree to a MI do-over and the main reason was because 100,000 RATS wouldn't get to vote. The reason was because they voted on the Republican ballot!
The RATS voted for Romney to keep him in and screw up the primary that should have ended his campaign.
I hope every Republican in PA votes for Hillary to screw the RATS into a huge convention war.
The first vote I ever cast in my life was a vote against Jimmy Carter. (And that was before he was President.)
On another note, I bet a brandy soaked fig would be pretty tasty! Anyone had any?
Just think if there was a balanced media who had really examined the candidates, we wouldn’t be treated to this insane drivel.
One wonders if Eleanor regrets her sidewalk sex with Bubba at the ‘68 Chicago convention.
Why is no one calling him on this lie?
There's no mention of his outlandishly equating what Geraldine Ferraro said - which was NOT racist! But since it came out of the mouth of a white person = a "Typical White Woman?" = it's racist, and she got dismissed....anyway, equating that and something he perceives his grandmother said after being accosted on the street by a panhandler demanding money = and after being given the dollar he demanded, demanding more - she was afraid. - (whom she identified, after questioning as = gasp - "black" - putting these two women into the same category as his bigoted, racist, white-hating, America hating surrogate daddy, Clift passes right over...nor does she mention his additional slip of his racist tongue when, in answer to why he dissed his gramma like that, calls her a "Typical White Woman" and goes on to allude it being a 'systemic' problem with whites!
This is the biggest group of racists in the country - but none dare call them that - they're "black"
Actually, there are some other firy black ministers that are calling them exactly that...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU
Over a million hits and counting You'll need to get past the first minute or so..
...
“...noting in particular how the anger of working-class whites over affirmative action and welfare formed the Reagan coalition.”
Yes, that’s it, Senator. The coalition had nothing to do with being tired of double-digit inflation, or with believing in a strong national defense, or embracing the crazy idea that people have a right to keep as much of their paycheck as possible.
/sarc
How neat and tidy.
“Oh, and the cable folks have told us why they won’t shut up about Jeremiahgate; the ratings go off the charts whenever they do a segment on it.”
Very astute observation
Ping to read later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.