Skip to comments.
Low level of 'bad cholesterol' increases death rate, researchers find
mainichi japan ^
| March 29, 2008
Posted on 03/29/2008 1:37:17 PM PDT by Mount Athos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Health food of the future:
To: Mount Athos
Great time of year for that picture, MA! :)
2
posted on
03/29/2008 1:41:32 PM PDT
by
Kolokotronis
(Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
To: Mount Athos
Researchers found that in terms of overall deaths, men and women in the group with the lowest LDL cholesterol level (79 milligrams per deciliter of blood or less) had the highest death rate.
Duh. Cholesterol is essential in tissue formation, especially that of nerves. Also, there is no such thing as LDL cholesterol. Low Density Lipoprotein is the name of the protein in the cholesterol transport particle, same for HDL used in reverse cholesterol transport.
3
posted on
03/29/2008 1:42:05 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Mount Athos
Approximately what I had for supper times 2.
LDL = 72.
Age = 81
4
posted on
03/29/2008 1:43:41 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
To: Mount Athos
The entire cholesterol issue is junk science, motivated by greedy pharmaceuticals.
5
posted on
03/29/2008 1:46:16 PM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
( Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.)
To: Mount Athos
Anybody remember Sleeper?
Hilarious!
My LDL is way down, so I better start eating butter!
6
posted on
03/29/2008 1:49:04 PM PDT
by
Shady
(The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
To: Mount Athos
This is really unbelievable.
Think about how many millions of Americans and people around the world are taking cholesterol lowering drugs (with all the side-effects that result including an increased death-rate.)
This rather large long-term study is going to be a BIG shocker to the medical community.
To: Mount Athos
My grandma lived 93 years on a diet of butter, salt, and bacon fat. She didn’t have much of a waistline, it is true, but she was strong and healthy.
To: Mount Athos
Wow! My husband needs to see this (the article, not the bacon sandwich) and consider the information next time he sees the doctor.
9
posted on
03/29/2008 1:51:52 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Everything is either willed or permitted by God, and nothing can hurt me." Bl. Charles de Foucauld)
To: Mount Athos
A difficult article to understand—”death rate” can be misleading.
10
posted on
03/29/2008 1:52:14 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
(Time for Conservatives to go Free Agent)
To: Rennes Templar
The entire cholesterol issue is junk science, motivated by greedy pharmaceuticals. No offense but that sounds exactly like moonbat reasoning. Many if not most heart surgeons consider bad cholesterol to be enemy numero uno. Now a moonbat will say the doctors are part of the conspiracy but personally I suspect that besides water everything we consume has benefits and costs and we'll never reach the end of these studies.
11
posted on
03/29/2008 1:52:52 PM PDT
by
bkepley
To: Mount Athos
It is interesting that this should find its way into the news at the same time the US medical establishment is lowering what they consider (claim) to be safe cholesterol numbers.
Dogma now is a max of 180 (overall). Lemmings. Follow the money.
12
posted on
03/29/2008 1:55:41 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: Mamzelle
A difficult article to understanddeath rate can be misleading. Has the "death rate" ever been less than 100.0%?
13
posted on
03/29/2008 1:57:34 PM PDT
by
Bob
To: Ole Okie
Uh, oh. According to this article, your’re going to die.
14
posted on
03/29/2008 2:00:50 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
To: ChildOfThe60s
"It is interesting that this should find its way into the news at the same time the US medical establishment is lowering what they consider (claim) to be safe cholesterol numbers." Yup. When my doctor recently doubled my cholesterol medicine, I quit taking it completely.
15
posted on
03/29/2008 2:00:53 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: bkepley
Those docs prescribing drugs to lower "bad" cholesterol know that the correlation between heart disease and cholesterol levels is not proven--it's even on the med's readout in tiny print.
They have been able to get reliable evidence from the raising of "good" cholesterol.
16
posted on
03/29/2008 2:01:56 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
(Time for Conservatives to go Free Agent)
To: Mount Athos
Since the human brain needs cholesterol to function properly, getting the rate too low also can bring on dementia. It is good that the Japanese are raising this issue because our doctors would rather keep prescribing Lipitor and Vytorin than look into the possible harm they can do.
To: Mount Athos
a balanced diet with exercise is the BEST requirements for a healthy life.
You have to listen to what your body is telling you.
To: Rennes Templar
"The entire cholesterol issue is junk science, motivated by greedy pharmaceuticals"I agree with you whole heartedly. My husbands doctor kept trying to get his LDL down as low as he possible could by upping his dosage, changing the cholesterol medication etc. My husband got to where he could hardly function. Finally I said enough is enough.
19
posted on
03/29/2008 2:04:22 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
To: Mount Athos
I have read numerous times that the homocysteine levels in your blood are way more important than cholesterol.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson