Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paulbots Attempt to Hijack County Republican Convention Process
3.30.08 | me

Posted on 03/30/2008 4:19:25 PM PDT by anymouse

Down here in Galveston County, the Ron Paul bots tried to hijack the convention using subterfuge and tactical advantage of surprise, that would have made al Queda proud (high-placed sleeper, multiple coordinated attacks with a goal of causing a larger scale effect at the State convention and later at the National convention.

Unfortunately for them it was discovered and thwarted for the most part by perceptive Republicans that took action and alerted others to help block their efforts. But it did make for a long and chaotic mess.

Like jihadists, they took advantage of a weak Party leadership in transition and general apathy of Party activists and precinct delegates.

A high level trusted elected official used the opportunity of a sick convention coordinator, a lame duck Party chairman and an honorary convention chair that did nothing but show up to give a speech at the start of the convention, to appoint weak commitee chairmen and pack key committees (Nominee, Credentials and Platform) with Paulbots, who had never been active in the Party before. To cover the obvious, a few "go-along" follower types were added to the committees to ensure the Paulbot block vote would not be challenged.

I sat in on the Resolutions/Platform committee after seeing some disturbing planks in the draft Platform. I witnessed a shocking railroad job of a Libertarian platform pushed through with highly questionable planks voted through with little opposition. Including one listing a list of complains against Sen. McCain and stating a no confidence in him as the Party's nominee. This was later removed in a heated floor fight.

Also the trusted official tried to get a change to the rules to allow people that had not voted in the Primary to be allowed to considered as State delegates. Supposedly to allow his daughter who had just turned 18 to go to State as a delegate (an understandable excuse.) But because I had been alerted to the plot to stack the nominations and Credentials committees, I knew that this could also be used to let Libertarians, who had not voted in the Republican Primary to be rammed through as sleeper Ron Paul delegates, merely by swearing to a worthless Party loyalty oath. The Parliamentarian eventually figured out that it was against State Party rules and it was withdrawn, before I could get my turn at the mic to explain the potential hazard of our entire SD delegations being disqualified at the State convention by the Credentials committee discovering that some of our delegates had not voted in the Primary.

They even had the audacity to add Bob Smither to the Nominating committee. Spither ran in the 2006 General election as the Libertarian Party candidate for CD 22. He didn't show up to the convention, but it was a clear evidence of a concerted Libertarian plot to hijack the Nominations process.

Eventually things worked out in a long and painful floor fight.

Most of the State delegates and alternates ended up being known Republicans, but there were a few that made it, that I didn't recognize as well as quite a few known Ron Paul supporters. So don't be surprised if other Paulbots make it to the State convention in Texas and elsewhere and try to infiltrate the State committees and attempt other mischief in a vain attempt to push Ron Paul as a viable nominee over McCain.

Although we are not thrilled with McCain as the presumptive Republican nominee, we cannot allow the resulting Party angst and apathy to be exploited by another Party, the Libertarians (and their radical Left and Right Paulbots) to hijack our State and National conventions.

If you doubt my observations, check out some of their stated plans:

"Delegates must VOID McCain's wins !!!" http://www.ronpaulforum.com/showthread.php?t=307129

: The delegates in these states need to file the motion at their conventions : for Mccain to be revoked of all his delegates in those states for failure : to comply with election ballot state law requirements.

"Republicans have choice - Ron Paul supporters tend to fall into two camps. Some believe he may still pull off a David vs." Ron Paul Topix forum http://www.topix.com/forum/us-house/ron-paul/TJQJFHLSRLIGG4PJA

: We held down the fort in Texas. Delegates at the least representing : Paul's platforms are in place.

: Ron Paul Supporter, : Dr. Aaron Benfield : Austin, Tx


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Texas; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: convention; galveston; paulestinians; republican; ronpaul; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last
If you wonder why Ron Paul hasn't conceded yet, maybe here is an answer. He needs to keep the Paulbots focused on further disruptive hijinx, not so much because he thinks that they will work. But for the same reason OBL keeps putting out video messages - to keep $$ flowing in to his war chest. If the Paulbots keep their irrational faith that RP will some how manage to gain any kind of position of power, they will keep sending in whatever they can. Arafat got very wealthy off of this game.
1 posted on 03/30/2008 4:19:26 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anymouse

This deceptive process reminds me at least somewhat of Rush Limbaugh’s operation chaos.


2 posted on 03/30/2008 4:26:51 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Libertarians lack any ethics whatsoever.


3 posted on 03/30/2008 4:27:23 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

All the more reason to vote for Chris Peden.


4 posted on 03/30/2008 4:27:38 PM PDT by Uncle Ivan (I'm still with Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

I am well aware of Ron Paul’s “get out of Iraq” views but I am also well aware of John McCain’s RINO record.

My attitude is that at least someone is standing up to business as usual liberalism disguised as “fiscal conservatism”, “mainstream conservatism” and all the other modified conservative labels the RINO’S put on themselves.

If I were in that convention, I would have supported good things the Paul people did and opposed the bad.

I wouldn’t have been so critical.


5 posted on 03/30/2008 4:27:52 PM PDT by Nextrush (MCCAIN, OBAMA, CLINTON......WHAT A CHOICE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Sorry, but comparing political maneuvers to al-Qaeda is more than a little over the top. It's disgusting. Trying to beat the nomination system is not the same as hacking someone's head off.

Including one listing a list of complains against Sen. McCain and stating a no confidence in him as the Party's nominee.

I'd have voted for that.

6 posted on 03/30/2008 4:29:22 PM PDT by xjcsa (Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Like jihadists....

Yup.

7 posted on 03/30/2008 4:32:24 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

If the 5% of primary voters who are Paulbots can continue to tie the RNC’s shorts in a knot, what do you think the Clintons or BO will do? Holy crap, we’re in worse trouble than I thought.


8 posted on 03/30/2008 4:32:28 PM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

xjcsa,
IAWTP


9 posted on 03/30/2008 4:32:38 PM PDT by paleorite ("Oy vey, Skippa-San" The immortal words of Fuji, formerly America's favorite POW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
Thank you for your post! It just needed to be said. It is disgusting.
10 posted on 03/30/2008 4:33:08 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Apparently they attempted the disruption/take over in other locations. Here’s a story of the their activities down in Nueces County:

GOP chairman thwarts takeover (by Ron Paulistas in Nueces County, Texas)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1994090/posts?


11 posted on 03/30/2008 4:34:37 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ivan

Uhhh...you might want to double-check before you do that. The primary has already happened.


12 posted on 03/30/2008 4:35:22 PM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ivan

All the more reason to vote for Chris Peden.


Peden got less than 30% of the vote in the primary.


13 posted on 03/30/2008 4:40:42 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: deport

Darn.


14 posted on 03/30/2008 4:44:36 PM PDT by Uncle Ivan (I'm still with Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

As I reported in the similar thread referenced in post #11, the “Paulian’s” disrupted our district caucus here in Wisconsin by attempting to confuse, amend, and oppose almost every resolution. Their disruptive actions appeared to be both coordinated and premeditated and accomplished nothing except to waste everyone’s time and build lasting resentments toward them and their causes.


15 posted on 03/30/2008 4:48:04 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Also similar tactics in Missouri.

“Ron Paul backers succeed in guerilla takeover of some GOP caucuses”
Ron Paul Forum - Pennsylvania
http://www.ronpaulforumpa.com/smf/index.php?topic=682.0

“Ron Paul backers succeed in guerilla takeover of some GOP caucuses”
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/politics/story/2953AF413B298DD2862574100013EE2D?OpenDocument

: Never before had St. Charles County Republican Party Chairman Jon
: Bennett received so many queries about where this year’s party caucus
: was to be held. And Bennett didn’t recognize most of the callers.

: On Saturday, Bennett learned why. Dozens of avid supporters of Ron
: Paul, a Texas congressman who is running a renegade quest for the
: presidential nomination, staged a political guerrilla attack. At that
: caucus at St. Peters City Hall — as well as others across the state
: — party regulars like Bennett were overwhelmed.

: Caucuses in Missouri, held only in presidential election years, are
: typically low-key affairs attended mainly by party diehards. But this
: year, the pro-Paul activists commandeered gatherings in the city of
: St. Louis, St. Louis County, Kansas City and Springfield. Paul
: supporters also controlled caucuses in at least a half dozen rural
: counties.

: The result: Paul’s supporters predict they have snagged roughly a
: third of the 2,137 state Republican delegates. Those delegates will
: determine the state GOP platform this spring and help select the
: presidential delegates to the national Republican presidential
: convention in Minneapolis in September.

: The unorthodox push, which sparked shouting matches in some meetings,
: reflected Paul’s campaign — an anti-establishment, grass-roots
: movement built on passion.

: At many of Saturday’s caucuses, the Paul contingents also won approval
: for some of their man’s key positions, including resolutions for
: withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and against the
: federal Patriot Act and warrantless wiretaps.

: But the most politically explosive resolution called for repealing the
: Missouri Republican Party requirement that all of the state’s 58 GOP
: presidential delegates back the victor in the Feb. 5 primary: U.S.
: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., now the presumptive presidential nominee.

: But Missouri Republican officials plan to fight back. State Republican
: Party Executive Director Jared Craighead said party leaders will be
: examining the lists of caucus-goers, and of the newly elected state
: delegates. He contends that some of the Paul activists involved in the
: caucuses were really Democrats or Libertarians who should be tossed
: off.

: But Bennett accused the Paul forces of deception. At the St. Charles
: County caucus, Paul backers did not identify themselves as such.
: Instead they promoted a group of proposed delegates they called the
: Conservative Values slate.

: “They went out of their way not to use ‘Ron Paul,’” Bennett said.
: “Intellectually they were dishonest about their reasons.”

: in St. Charles County, gave credit to his side’s stealth preparations,
: which included mock caucuses.


16 posted on 03/30/2008 4:49:51 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch of RINOs.

I hope Ron Paul DOES succeed in some of these hijinks. The Stupid Party needs a by-God wakeup call, or we’re doomed to turn on the drive-time radio station one day soon and find out we’ve got an Emperor, and not a president, and all future elections are cancelled.


17 posted on 03/30/2008 4:49:54 PM PDT by Supercharged Merlin (The way to take money out of politics is to take the politics out of money !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
This deceptive process reminds me at least somewhat of Rush Limbaugh’s operation chaos.

Oh what a crock! First of all Operation Chaos is, if anything, blowback on the Dems for their tinkering in open-primary states not just this election cycle but many before. A republican voter crossing over to throw a wrench is far from stealthly placing people in positions that negate the whole process to benefit a losing candidate while at the same time attempting to inflict as much damge as possible to the actual nominee.

Your thesis is beyond absurdity.

18 posted on 03/30/2008 4:56:45 PM PDT by torchthemummy (W's Margin Of Victory In Florida 2000 - 537 / FL House Bill Number To Move Up Florida Primary - 537)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
‘I witnessed a shocking railroad job of a Libertarian platform pushed through with highly questionable planks voted through with little opposition.’

Thank God! At least it is a group of people who believe in less gov’t. This is great. At least it isn't Fabians who keep on getting elected.

19 posted on 03/30/2008 4:57:10 PM PDT by BGHater ($2300 is the limit of your Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

And by the way, last time I looked, Ron Paul was a REPUBLICAN, not a Libertarian.


20 posted on 03/30/2008 4:57:42 PM PDT by Supercharged Merlin (The way to take money out of politics is to take the politics out of money !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
Your thesis is beyond absurdity.

Get a grip and relax. Regardless of party affiliation, the similarity is both are employing a method to completely disrupt an established process.
21 posted on 03/30/2008 5:01:18 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin

Once Op CHAOS is perfected, we need to turn it on the RNC.


22 posted on 03/30/2008 5:05:21 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin
And by the way, last time I looked, Ron Paul was a REPUBLICAN, not a Libertarian.

Ron Paul IS a Libertarian that switched to the GOP for national office legitimacy.

Ron Paul is valid on several issues but is bonkers on national security. Hitler didn't need to be taken down? Civil War was unneccesary? Al-queda not a threat? No wiretaps? Yada, yada. When he talks about national security he just turns into standard democrat peace activist mode with wild eyes and wild voice thrown in.

In a way I'm glad the Ronbots did this chicanery. Now the actual GOP members will root the nuts out next time. Ironically Ron Paul's tactics to supposedly browbeat the GOP establishment have given the GOP establishment the incentive/rationale to tighten the loopholes. Good.

23 posted on 03/30/2008 5:08:04 PM PDT by torchthemummy (W's Margin Of Victory In Florida 2000 - 537 / FL House Bill Number To Move Up Florida Primary - 537)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin

only when it comes to getting on the ballot (ever since he got spanked when he ran as the Libertarian Party nominee for President.) In every other way he is Libertarian through and through.


24 posted on 03/30/2008 5:10:22 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

....except that Rush is open and honest about what he is doing.


25 posted on 03/30/2008 5:11:27 PM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Not only do I not care for Ron Pauls politics, I don’t like him personally. He is a rude and mean individual in my opinion. Ducking!!!


26 posted on 03/30/2008 5:12:55 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Get a grip and relax. Regardless of party affiliation, the similarity is both are employing a method to completely disrupt an established process.

No there is a difference. Operation Chaos is fiddling with out-in-the-open tactics by simply elongating the oppositions process if possible. The Paulbots tactics are by complete subterfuge to gain positions at a committee level and then attempting to negate the process at a managerial level, if you will.

Operation Chaos - chicanery via one man-one vote results. Paulbots - chicanery to stealthly invalidate the one man-one vote results. Big difference.

27 posted on 03/30/2008 5:15:04 PM PDT by torchthemummy (W's Margin Of Victory In Florida 2000 - 537 / FL House Bill Number To Move Up Florida Primary - 537)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
....except that Rush is open and honest about what he is doing.

I agree.
28 posted on 03/30/2008 5:20:14 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
No there is a difference. Operation Chaos is fiddling with out-in-the-open tactics by simply elongating the oppositions process if possible.

Actually that's not correct. As Rush has explained in detail one phase will have operatives on the convention floor posing as delegates. Rush will contact these "operatives" via text messaging to perform certain tactics to disrupt the process. At least two callers have phoned in to tell him they have gone as far as to become delegates.
29 posted on 03/30/2008 5:24:26 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf; traviskicks

snicker ping


30 posted on 03/30/2008 5:35:25 PM PDT by murphE (I refuse to choose evil, even if it is the lesser of two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
As Rush has explained in detail one phase will have operatives on the convention floor posing as delegates. Rush will contact these "operatives" via text messaging to perform certain tactics to disrupt the process. At least two callers have phoned in to tell him they have gone as far as to become delegates.

1-Do you have a link? 2- Delegates almost always are bonafide party members with years of support history. I simply don't believe it. Someone may have claimed as such on the phone but anonymous calls do not reality make. It could have been a setup to make Dems nervous and suspicious of each other. Even if true this still would be the negating of one delegate vote for another. I would disagree with the subterfuge but again it is not the rules committee which could have the power to sway the convention and superdelegates towards one candidate or another.

31 posted on 03/30/2008 5:37:15 PM PDT by torchthemummy (W's Margin Of Victory In Florida 2000 - 537 / FL House Bill Number To Move Up Florida Primary - 537)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Back in 1988 we had the same problem in Brazos county with Pat Robertson jihadists. They would attend precinct meetings and put forward their candidates, who would be soundly defeated. Then they would hang around until the majority of precinct members had elected the precinct’s delegates to the county convention and had left for home. Then they would make motions to reopen nominations and “elect” their nominees. They showed up at the county convention and tried to have “their delegates” seated. Fortunately the county chairman threw them out.


32 posted on 03/30/2008 5:46:52 PM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Redefeat Communism by defeating Hitlary in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
In Corpus Christi, the local party leaders were tipped off weeks ago by the boorish behavior of the Paulistas. I sure wish every member of the Nueces County Republican Club had attended our county convention as a delegate, we definitely could have used more numbers of bodies to say "yea" or "nea". Still we headed them off very early during the reading of the report of the credentials committee. The party chair was a veteran of precisely these kinds of tactics 20 years ago when Pat Robertson followers took over the Nueces county GOP convention, and he wasn't going to let that happen again.

Here'a a link to a thread I posted earlier today about the Nueces County GOP convention.

GOP chairman thwarts takeover (by Ron Paulistas in Nueces County, Texas)
The Corpus Christi Caller-Times ^ | Sunday, March 30, 2008 | Denise Malan

Posted on 03/30/2008 12:31:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

33 posted on 03/30/2008 5:46:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingConspirator; anymouse; John D
Back in 1988 we had the same problem in Brazos county with Pat Robertson jihadists

In 1988 the Pat Robertson gang took over the Nueces County County GOP convention, and the GOP organization ended up holding the rump convention. Mike Bertuzzi the Nueces County Republican Chair was a veteran of that convention, and was determined to not let the convention get hijacked again. He said that the previous hijacking had harmed the party for 20 year since.

Also see my post #32 and the thread linked in it.

34 posted on 03/30/2008 5:54:56 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RightWingConspirator; anymouse; John D
Also see my post #32 and the thread linked in it.

Actually I meant post #33

35 posted on 03/30/2008 6:02:32 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Our County Convention in Oklahoma had the same problems. Be prepared for next year when we elect officers because they intend to take over everything from the County to the State.

We approved the platform but then our Chair decided that they could debate which was against the Rules but this is Oklahoma. They were trying to change the platform — I left and told others if you leave the hall and there is no quorum, the Convention will be over which is what they did.

We all need to be prepared for next year when we elect Chairs.


36 posted on 03/30/2008 6:15:30 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Broken Glass Republican -- http://democratsforsale.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Even though I disagree with about half their platform I salute their determination.. We should all be doing this.


37 posted on 03/30/2008 6:48:41 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse; murphE; CJ Wolf

heh heh... Good for them and too bad for the big spending big government loving republicans in TX. We got the same thing going here in NV, except even more so, wait till you see what happens over here. The Ron Paul revolution has brought a whole new cadre of people into politics whose goal is liberty. Look out for us. :)


38 posted on 03/30/2008 7:26:06 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murphE; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
39 posted on 03/30/2008 7:28:50 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ivan
All the more reason to vote for Chris Peden.

Paul raped Peden in the primary already.

40 posted on 03/30/2008 7:33:44 PM PDT by jmc813 (You guys wanna go cheese?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
1-Do you have a link? 2- Delegates almost always are bonafide party members with years of support history. I simply don't believe it.

Operation Chaos, Phase Three: Our Operatives Will Go to Denver

From the transcript:

"RUSH: Now, yesterday we had our second call like this. We've had callers from Texas who are foot soldiers, enlisted officers in Operation Chaos. Both of these gentlemen -- one in Austin, the other from Galveston -- not only voted for Hillary Clinton in the Texas primary, they went a step further.

They went back and they caucused! Operation Chaos operatives went back and caucused for Hillary Clinton. These two are just two of many. These two are now delegates to the Texas state convention. We have operatives on the inside of the Texas state convention. They are delegates for Hillary Clinton. They will be there undercover. They will be there as Operation Chaos covert operatives. But they are not the only two. I've heard talk (I'm sure that you have, too) that the Drive-By Media says that Operation Chaos isn't working, which, as I said yesterday, is just great news. It's music to my ears. If they think it's not working, they will continue to ignore us (ha-ha) and we will be able to slither in underneath the radar making them even more vulnerable. Now, folks, there are many phases here to Operation Chaos. We're simply here still in phase one. Phase one consists of operatives changing party registration, voting in Democrat primaries in upcoming states. This happened in Ohio and Texas in record numbers. It looks like it'll happen in Pennsylvania in record numbers. In this case, voting for Hillary to continue the bloodletting in the Democrat Party all the way through their convention, for the chaos to continue.

Now, the second and third phases of Operation Chaos consist of exactly what you've heard happening in Texas: Our operatives actually are being named delegates to state party conventions. The third phase of Operation Chaos will lead to some of these delegates being sent and named as delegates to the Democrat National Convention in Denver. So Democrats out there, and you members of the Drive-By Media -- you who think that Operation Chaos isn't working and is ineffective -- remember this: When we get to Denver and the Democrat National Convention and you look around and you're a delegate, the person next to you could be mine. The person sitting next to you in your delegation could be an Operation Chaos operative. Now, let's fantasize for a moment about where phase three of Operation Chaos could take us. I mean, let's say we get down to this convention and they get into a credentials fight and all of the votes that have taken place up 'til now in the Democrat primaries are rendered meaningless. The superdelegates weigh in, credentials fight, all that goes on. Let's say it comes down to a close vote, 10, 20, maybe 30 votes separating Obama and Hillary. Phase three of Operation Chaos makes it quite possible that my operatives -- my operatives! -- will determine the Democrat nominee.

It is quite possible that I and my operatives will be choosing the Democrat presidential nominee. They might be saying, "Rush, why are you giving this away? I mean, you're running a covert operation, yet you're telling us about it." That's exactly right. Because you don't think it's true. You think I'm making it all up. You think I'm smoking you. You think I'm just having fun. Furthermore, you don't even think it's effective anyway. You are wide-open vulnerable for phase three of Operation Chaos. I'm happy to tell you what I'm going to do. I spell out what our intentions are every day on this program for 20 years and you haven't been able to stop us. You will not be able to stop phase three of Operation Chaos. Here at the EIB Network, we have highly skilled information technology technicians and professionals working on a special encryption program so that I can send instructions to our operatives at the Democrat National Convention via their handheld wireless devices: iPhones, whatever it is, whatever they use. This is how Operation Chaos will send the message to various operatives that are there as delegates to the Democrat National Convention. It's being tested as we speak. It will be ready in just a few days, probably toward the end of next week.

So even if you are forewarned -- all of you liberals and the Drive-By Media people, Democrats -- you will not know and you will not be able to trust and you will not be able to confirm just of which your delegates in Denver are mine. Part of Operation Chaos. They will have been credentialed. They will have passed all the tests. They will have been to state conventions prior to arriving in Denver. They will have been briefed. They will be told how to vote by me, depending on their number and the closeness of the final vote at the convention, and it will be easy for them to receive my instructions because of the special encryption that we are working on for our wireless transmission to their handheld devices. So those are the next phases of Operation Chaos. I just wanted to alert you to both of these instances. No crimes have been committed, no charges in Ohio for voter fraud. I mentioned the phase two and phase three of Operation Chaos yesterday in the final hour of the program, and I wanted to get to it the first part of the program today so that everybody was up to speed on it.
"
41 posted on 03/30/2008 7:35:55 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I applaud their efforts and wish similarly motivated folks luck elsewhere. The Republicans need to have their big-government leanings challenged - and if it takes the doings of some folks with weak foreign policy views, fine.

The GOP is now hoisting on up a candidate with almost all of Ron Paul's foreign policy deficiencies (save for his view on Iraq) plus some additional ones (see latest McCain speech), AND enough domestic leftism to slay an elephant. You pretty much have to feel a greater allegiance to Iraq than to America in order to endorse McCain over Paul. Otherwise, that chip ain't worth the trade.

42 posted on 03/30/2008 7:43:57 PM PDT by M203M4 (True Universal Suffrage: Pets of dead illegal-immigrant felons voting Democrat (twice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

These people are all registered Republicans. The system rewards the people that show up, plain and simple.


43 posted on 03/30/2008 7:51:59 PM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ivan
All the more reason to vote for Chris Peden.

A little late, isn't it???

44 posted on 03/30/2008 8:22:34 PM PDT by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

How much worse, in the grand scheme, would a Ron Paul presidency be as compared to a John McCain, Hillary, or Obama presidency be?


45 posted on 03/30/2008 8:30:52 PM PDT by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; George W. Bush; Revelation 911; NapkinUser; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; ...

let freedom Ping!


46 posted on 03/30/2008 8:36:24 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Let Freedom Ping List - Ron Paul - Ron Paul - Ron Paul - Join it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
This is about the most childish and juvenile vanity I have ever seen posted in FR. Can we compare Bush to Hitler now? How about Rush to Al Frankien? The possibilities are endless.
47 posted on 03/30/2008 8:48:50 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I did not attack RP, just his followers underhanded tactics in their attempt to hijack the Republican Party convention process. At the worst, I accused him of benefiting financially from allowing his minions’ delusional antics to continue well past the point where it is clear that he is not a viable candidate (one could argue that he never was a viable candidate, but that is another issue.)

I doubt that he or even his campaign is linked to this activity, but I would love for it to be proven to be so. Regardless it will hurt him with the Republican Party leadership and voters in 2 years, when we can assume he will roll out the Paulbots once again to do their worst.


48 posted on 03/30/2008 9:26:55 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

>a worthless Party loyalty oath<

You couldn’t have described it better! The GOP left me, I didn’t leave them.


49 posted on 03/30/2008 9:54:20 PM PDT by B4Ranch ( Rope, Tree & Traitor; Some Assembly Required || Gun Control Means Never Having To Say I Missed You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
...the Libertarians (and their radical Left and Right Paulbots)...

I thought the Paulestinians were the ones the Libertarians kicked out. ;-)

50 posted on 03/30/2008 10:07:42 PM PDT by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson