Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Liz; Calpernia; calcowgirl; indylindy; AuntB; Tennessee Nana; pissant; SoConPubbie; ElkGroveDan; ..
2 posted on
05/09/2008 2:59:13 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
To: Grunthor; E. Cartman
3 posted on
05/09/2008 3:00:38 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Why not Ann?
After all, your stupid enough to campaign for her.
4 posted on
05/09/2008 3:00:53 AM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
To: jellybean
6 posted on
05/09/2008 3:08:48 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Frum makes the case that a successful GOP candidate will be the one who returns to fiscal conservatism, reigning in out-of-control spending, even if he or she wanders off the reservation over an issue like illegal immigration.
You can't reign in out-of-control spending while allowing uncontrolled immigration (I didn't use the word "illegal" because it might not BE illegal anymore, after next Jan 20).
The continued influx of needy immigrants makes out-of-control spending impossible to reign in.
7 posted on
05/09/2008 3:13:41 AM PDT by
samtheman
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
If McCain even hints at a McCain/Clinton ticket, to me it will be proof positive that we do not have a two-party system, but we have a one-party system working, and I will start looking for evidence that the heads of both parties have been or soon will be actually conducting joint meetings on the future (if one can call it a “future”) of the nation.
I do believe that the United States is now a one-party socialist democracy (mob rule). We need some real (genuinely Constitutional/Conservative third-party movement so that we can re-establish a two-party system.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Hindenburg and Hitlery...
13 posted on
05/09/2008 3:24:32 AM PDT by
johnny7
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Lets hope Sen. McCain doesnt choose to cross the road hand-in-hand with Sen. Clinton. Oh, why not? It would demonstrate the ultimate in bi-partisan cooperation, hands across the aisle, love thy liberal thinking.
Actually, Ms Coulter is correct. He would be stupid enough to do it.
14 posted on
05/09/2008 3:27:08 AM PDT by
MaggieCarta
(Disobedience is in our DNA. - Charlton Heston)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
15 posted on
05/09/2008 3:27:10 AM PDT by
SueRae
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
17 posted on
05/09/2008 3:30:15 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Four years of Carter gave us 29 years of Iran; What will Hilabama give us?)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Lets hope Sen. McCain doesnt choose to cross the road hand-in-hand with Sen. Clinton.That would be enough to ensure an Obama victory.
18 posted on
05/09/2008 3:30:19 AM PDT by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Gallagher is not the sharpest knife in the drawer
19 posted on
05/09/2008 3:32:53 AM PDT by
don-o
(My son, Ben, reports to Parris Island on June 30.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
If he does, he’ll never see 73! Fort Marcey Park.
20 posted on
05/09/2008 3:33:30 AM PDT by
noname07718
(The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
The entire idea of HRC as McCain's VP borders on hysteria.
McCain will not declare defeat in Iraq, and he will stand behind our armed forces no matter what, something HRC has repeatedly said she would not do.
People who seek to diminish McCain because of one grievance or another forget the totality of a BHO nightmare presidency. Barry is seeking to “change” everything about our country, including disarming it. Hamas has endorsed him for good reason. With Barry as POTUS, they can just walk in...here and in Israel.
21 posted on
05/09/2008 3:35:06 AM PDT by
ishabibble
(ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I love Ann, but this? Really, really dumb.
22 posted on
05/09/2008 3:39:49 AM PDT by
lexusppd
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Hey—she’d bring in those dem votes that all of the McCainiacs seem to embrace. And, they could beat Obama!
Just win, baby!
/s
24 posted on
05/09/2008 3:41:50 AM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
What all these people forget is that George Bush running as a conservative won the most votes ever in 2004. 62 million or something like that. I think Kerry was 3 million behind and he was the second most votes ever. Conservatism wins.
However, this year conservatism may not win because the Republicans have screwed things up so much when they were in power and the John McPain approach may succeed.... we will see in November.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
How about it. Could all of you “hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils” still do that if Hillary is the Republican VP?
27 posted on
05/09/2008 3:55:45 AM PDT by
liliesgrandpa
("Republican Party = "Hold Your Nose and Vote Party"")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
28 posted on
05/09/2008 4:00:57 AM PDT by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I wouldn’t put it past McCain to pick Hillary. And I don’t think she would turn it down. After all, the Democrats have already deserted her—what would she have to lose? And McCain is old, so she wouldn’t have to wait long before she could step into his position. At his age, any number of things could...happen.
32 posted on
05/09/2008 4:06:12 AM PDT by
giotto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson