Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

al-Qaeda’s Zawahiri And Saddam Hussein Were Planning Attacks After 9-11
Strata Sphere ^ | Jun 21 2008 1:25 pm | AJStrata

Posted on 06/22/2008 1:26:45 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

The SurrenderMedia recently misreported (there’s a surprise) that Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda, when in fact the report the SurrenderMedia was trying to cover said just the opposite. As I noted at the time the analysis showed Saddam Hussein had long time ties with Ayman Zawahiri, who at the time ran the Egyptian Islamic Jihad terrorist group. A group that was integrated into al-Qaeda when Zawahiri joined forces with Bin Laden in the 1990’s.

Gateway Pundit has a link to a recent news article out of Iraq showing evidence that Saddam Hussein continued his ties with Zawahiri after Egyptian Islamic Jihad had been integrated into al-Qaeda. In fact, the evidence points to Saddam attempting to coordinate terrorist attacks with al-Qaed AFTER 9-11!

The Kurdish daily Kurdistani Nwe has published a 2002 letter from the Iraqi presidency that it says proves that there was cooperation between the regime of Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda. 

The letter, which appeared on the paper’s front page, was published by the intelligence apparatus of the Iraqi presidency and discussed an intention to meet with Ayman Al-Zawahiri in order to examine a plan drawn up by the Iraqi presidency to carry out a “revenge operation” in Saudi Arabia.

Unlike the previous evidence which did not show communication between Saddam and his ol’ buddy Zawahiri after 9-11, this evidence clearly shows Saddam knew who to go to in al-Qaeda to execute attacks on American allies after 9-11.  So much for the “Bush Lied” crap from the SurrenderMedia and Surrendercrats in Congress.

Even more than that, Saddam’s was a notoriously reckless and power hungry brute.  His invasion of Iran and Kuwait demonstrated how insane the man could be.  His obsession with WMDs was proven out when his son-in-law exposed his undetected nuclear weapons program.  Now we learn this unstable nutcase was attempting to coordinate an attack with al-Qaeda after 9-11, when he knew such contact could bring the wrath of America to his doorstep.

As usual, Bush was right and the libs were making things up to garner votes. Why would the liberal BS in 2008 be any less false than the BS they have promulgated for 7 long years?  Clearly it isn’t.

 

17 Responses to “al-Qaeda’s Zawahiri And Saddam Hussein Were Planning Attacks After 9-11”



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedaandiraq; alqaedainiraq; alqaida; alzawahiri; dimrats; globaljihad; iraq; jihad; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; propagandawingofdnc; saddam; saddamhussein; wot; zawahiri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2008 1:26:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; elhombrelibre; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; G8 Diplomat; Dog; Cap Huff; ...

More evidence regarding Saddam.


2 posted on 06/22/2008 1:28:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bump bump bump bump bump bump bump


3 posted on 06/22/2008 1:29:12 PM PDT by Skooz (Any nation that would elect Hillary Clinton as its president has forfeited its right to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Can't be! “Lord HAW-HAW’ Reid and Princess Pelosi said so. < / sarc ridicule
4 posted on 06/22/2008 1:31:23 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Your thread Syria, NKorea helped Iran develop nuclear programme: German report (Der Spiegel)

is mentioned in the comments section....

5 posted on 06/22/2008 1:34:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Anybody with half a brain knew Saddam had terrorist ties to everyone in the middle east. Look at the training camp he helped run at Salman Pak. He also was pumping a ton of money to Arafat’s chronies.


6 posted on 06/22/2008 1:34:14 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Not a single person will believe this.
Unless they are a FReeper and knew it anyway.

I’ve tried telling others and they wave their hand and disregard it.


7 posted on 06/22/2008 1:35:15 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
Anybody with half a brain.. that leaves out all Democrats sice they don't even have half a brain; Scarecrow form Wizard of Oz they are, "If I only had a brain" fame.
8 posted on 06/22/2008 1:37:49 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The Gateway Pundit link:

Iraqis Publish More Proof Of Saddam Links To Al-Qaeda Leadership

9 posted on 06/22/2008 1:38:39 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Stop trying to confuse us with the facts


10 posted on 06/22/2008 1:39:20 PM PDT by nuconvert (Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

See #9...


11 posted on 06/22/2008 1:39:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yeah, but then they saw the great job Tom Daschle, Ted Kennedy, and Jay Rockefeller were doing without their help, and said “screw it.”


12 posted on 06/22/2008 1:40:25 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

13 posted on 06/22/2008 1:40:46 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Vote For McCain But Trust In The Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Pass the bong.....


14 posted on 06/22/2008 1:41:03 PM PDT by gitmogrunt (Two faces of JOHN McCAIN, one is dangerously pro islamic terror state in the Balkans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s all lies, just more Pentagon War Propaganda < / sarc Left’s BDS self justification


15 posted on 06/22/2008 1:41:23 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


16 posted on 06/22/2008 1:45:33 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (If you're not taking flak, you're not over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Starman417
Related thread:

Democrats’ Admit: Saddam’s Regime Harbored Al Queda

*******************EXCERPT INTRO*******************

Posted on Tue 10 Jun 2008 09:24:59 AM PDT by Starman417

Hours after Senator Clinton dropped out of the race, and the news cycle was swamped with never-ending coverage of the inevitable doing the inevitable something was released under the radar.

link

Back in 2004 the Senate Intelligence Committee began an investigation into pre-war intelligence regarding Saddam's regime, the threat it posed, and how the intelligence was handled. Democrats on the committee did their best to politicize the investigation and give it the appearance of a precursor to impeachment of President Bush under some sort of Bush Lied conspiracy theory. They did this for purely political purposes despite being contrary to national interests. Again and again the committee came out with report after report. Each report showed that the problems with pre-war intelligence regarding Saddam's regime was not some grand conspiracy by a President who can barely read a teleprompter, but rather the result of bad intelligence from agencies that were as on the ball in 2002 and 2003 as they were on 9/11/2001; they were out of touch, undermanned, ill-equipped, budget constrained, and bureaucratically strangled.

17 posted on 06/22/2008 1:48:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

fyi


18 posted on 06/22/2008 1:51:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Wonder why this has not been on every major network? /sarcasm


19 posted on 06/22/2008 1:57:02 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

A reply to this from a NR writer is a great site

http://www.regimeofterror.com.


20 posted on 06/22/2008 2:28:39 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Makes one wonder how much Opecker Blood money is paid to A$$holes like the ones who run SurrenderMedia.

There must be a lot of hard evidence about to surface re Saddam’s al Qaeda connections before and after 9/11.


21 posted on 06/22/2008 2:38:09 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Kerry was a Uber Liberal, Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas makes Kerry look like Jesse Helms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Iraqi Document: Planning of a Meeting Between Al Zawahiri and Saddam Regime in 2002 (Translation).
Burthanews.com ^ | May 9 2007 | jveritas

Posted on Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:38:37 PM by jveritas

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1831093/posts


22 posted on 06/22/2008 2:42:46 PM PDT by april15Bendovr (Free Republic & Ron Paul Cult = oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; elhombrelibre

Gosh...I wonder when we’ll see this reported on CNN?


23 posted on 06/22/2008 2:43:41 PM PDT by Allegra (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

ARRRRGGGGGGHHH. Nothing here. Democrats hate the truth. Go Obama! /S


24 posted on 06/22/2008 3:05:16 PM PDT by rocksblues (Folks we are in trouble, "Mark Levin" 03/26/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Here’s some more links Ernest.
All of these looks are ok to open.

#

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/prewardocs
http://www.knwe.org/Kurdistani%20Nwe/18-6-2008/Kurdistani%20Nwe.htm
http://www.thememriblog.org/image/4049.JPG

#

BLOG:

http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/8082.htm
(”Source: www.knwe.org (http://www.knwe.org/Kurdistani%20Nwe/18-6-2008/Kurdistani%20Nwe.htm), June 20, 2008”)

“Kurdish Paper: Cooperation Between Saddam Regime, Al-Qaeda”

SNIPPET: “The Kurdish daily Kurdistani Nwe has published a 2002 letter from the Iraqi presidency that it says proves that there was cooperation between the regime of Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda.

The letter, which appeared on the paper’s front page, was published by the intelligence apparatus of the Iraqi presidency and discussed an intention to meet with Ayman Al-Zawahiri in order to examine a plan drawn up by the Iraqi presidency to carry out a “revenge operation” in Saudi Arabia.”

Posted at: 2008-06-20


25 posted on 06/22/2008 3:05:30 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Will the October Surprise be — WMD found in Iraq!


26 posted on 06/22/2008 3:11:34 PM PDT by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: maro

Smiling at you and sighing a bit...probably not.


27 posted on 06/22/2008 3:14:09 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; SoCalPol
Thanks to your link at post # 20...been doing some reading...found this there from March 15, 2008 :

Media swings and misses on IDA's Saddam report

******************EXCERPT*******************

The past few days have seen a whirlwind of news stories and blog posts relating to a new D.O.D. sponsored study on Saddam Hussein's links to terrorism. The report, authored by Kevin M. Woods of the Institute for Defense Analysis, is now available online (link, Volumes I -V here) and has been the subject of debate over its content, release and meaning.

The storm began (as noted in Stephen Hayes must read piece) with a McClatchy news piece titled "Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida." The leak-based story essentially summarizes a 94 page report down to a single, unrepresentative phrase. For the record it should be noted that once the report was made available to the public it was revealed that its author's actually say on page ES-3 that their report is not exhaustive (contrary to the early news report) stating that the list of Hussein era documents are "not an exhaustive list" beause some were in the possession of other U.S. government agencies. This story was followed by headlines of a similar bent. Steve Schippert's sample of some of the more prominent headlines provides readers with what the story's narrative looked like a few days ago:

ABC: Report Shows No Link Between Saddam and al Qaeda
New York Times: Study Finds No Qaeda-Hussein Tie
CNN: Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda not linked, Pentagon says
Washington Post: Study Discounts Hussein, Al-Qaeda Link
AFP: No link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda: Pentagon study

And within hours the (mainstream media) die had been cast. Saddam was not linked to al Qaeda went the theme.

The initial news reports of the study's findings were so far off base that one of the researchers involved in the report said (via Stephen Hayes) "The document is being misrepresented. I recommend we put [it] out and on a website immediately."

*************************************

Now to the McClatchy Report

*********************EXCERPT*****************

McClatchy Report in March 2008:

Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam and al Qaida

Posted on Monday, March 10, 2008

By Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — An exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein's regime had any operational links with Osama bin Laden's al Qaida terrorist network.

The Pentagon-sponsored study, scheduled for release later this week, did confirm that Saddam's regime provided some support to other terrorist groups, particularly in the Middle East, U.S. officials told McClatchy. However, his security services were directed primarily against Iraqi exiles, Shiite Muslims, Kurds and others he considered enemies of his regime.

The new study of the Iraqi regime's archives found no documents indicating a "direct operational link" between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaida before the invasion, according to a U.S. official familiar with the report.

He and others spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity because the study isn't due to be shared with Congress and released before Wednesday.

President Bush and his aides used Saddam's alleged relationship with al Qaida, along with Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction, as arguments for invading Iraq after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld claimed in September 2002 that the United States had "bulletproof" evidence of cooperation between the radical Islamist terror group and Saddam's secular dictatorship.

Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell cited multiple linkages between Saddam and al Qaida in a watershed February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council to build international support for the invasion. Almost every one of the examples Powell cited turned out to be based on bogus or misinterpreted intelligence.

As recently as last July, Bush tried to tie al Qaida to the ongoing violence in Iraq. "The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims," he said.

The new study, entitled "Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents", was essentially completed last year and has been undergoing what one U.S. intelligence official described as a "painful" declassification review.

It was produced by a federally-funded think tank, the Institute for Defense Analyses, under contract to the Norfolk, Va.-based U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Spokesmen for the Joint Forces Command declined to comment until the report is released. One of the report's authors, Kevin Woods, also declined to comment.

The issue of al Qaida in Iraq already has played a role in the 2008 presidential campaign.

28 posted on 06/22/2008 3:27:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
Related thread:

Harboring al Qaeda ( What the new Senate Intelligence Report says about Saddam's hospitality)

Weekly Standard ^ | 06/10/2008 12:00:00 AM | Thomas Joscelyn

Posted on Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:30:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE has once again released a report claiming that the Bush administration hyped prewar intelligence. The so-called Phase Two report is supposed to investigate the Bush administration's handling of prewar intelligence. In reality, the report is little more than yet another attempt by partisan Democrats to make political hay out of flawed prewar intelligence. (The only Republicans to endorse the report were two of the Senate's most liberal GOP members.) The committee focused exclusively on prewar statements by Bush administration officials, ignoring similar statements by leading Democrats. Therefore, the report is intended to portray the Bush administration in the worst possible light. But even with this bias, the committee came to a noteworthy conclusion: The Bush administration was right to claim that Saddam's regime was harboring al Qaeda members.

The Senate Intelligence Committee's report includes this conclusion at the end of a terse section on the Bush administration's claims about Saddam's prewar terror ties:

Statements that Iraq provided safe haven for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and other al Qaeda-related terrorist members were substantiated by the intelligence assessments.

Intelligence assessments noted Zarqawi's presence in Iraq and his ability to travel and operate within the country. The intelligence community generally believed that Iraqi intelligence must have known about, and therefore at least tolerated, Zarqawi's presence in the country.

Regarding postwar information collected by the U.S. intelligence community, the report reads:

Postwar information supports prewar assessments and statements that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was in Baghdad and that al Qaeda was present in northern Iraq.

These conclusions

should not be surprising.

29 posted on 06/22/2008 3:37:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Thanks...


30 posted on 06/22/2008 3:38:23 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This contradicts everything we know to be true.


31 posted on 06/22/2008 3:39:02 PM PDT by afortiori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Thanks.


32 posted on 06/22/2008 3:39:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bump


33 posted on 06/22/2008 3:40:57 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

You’re welcome Ernest.
A blessed Sunday to you.


34 posted on 06/22/2008 3:42:33 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Correction: The word “looks” should be “links” in post no. 25.


35 posted on 06/22/2008 3:44:02 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Adding more confusion...


36 posted on 06/22/2008 3:44:47 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
Now to the Weekly standard article by Stephen Hayes ,...03/24/2008,:

Saddam's Dangerous Friends
What a Pentagon review of 600,000 Iraqi documents tells us.

***********************EXCERPT********************

This ought to be big news. Throughout the early and mid-1990s, Saddam Hussein actively supported an influential terrorist group headed by the man who is now al Qaeda's second-in-command, according to an exhaustive study issued last week by the Pentagon. "Saddam supported groups that either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda's stated goals and objectives." According to the Pentagon study, Egyptian Islamic Jihad was one of many jihadist groups that Iraq's former dictator funded, trained, equipped, and armed.

The study was commissioned by the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia, and produced by analysts at the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federally funded military think tank. It is entitled "Iraqi Perspectives Project: Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents." The study is based on a review of some 600,000 documents captured in postwar Iraq. Those "documents" include letters, memos, computer files, audiotapes, and videotapes produced by Saddam Hussein's regime, especially his intelligence services. The analysis section of the study covers 59 pages. The appendices, which include copies of some of the captured documents and translations, put the entire study at approximately 1,600 pages.

An abstract that describes the study reads, in part:

*********************

Because Saddam's security organizations and Osama bin Laden's terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a 'de facto' link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam's use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime."

**************************

Among the study's other notable findings:

In 1993, as Osama bin Laden's fighters battled Americans in Somalia, Saddam Hussein personally ordered the formation of an Iraqi terrorist group to join the battle there.

For more than two decades, the Iraqi regime trained non-Iraqi jihadists in training camps throughout Iraq.

According to a 1993 internal Iraqi intelligence memo, the regime was supporting a secret Islamic Palestinian organization dedicated to "armed jihad against the Americans and Western interests."

In the 1990s, Iraq's military intelligence directorate trained and equipped "Sudanese fighters."

In 1998, the Iraqi regime offered "financial and moral support" to a new group of jihadists in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.

In 2002, the year before the war began, the Iraqi regime hosted in Iraq a series of 13 conferences for non-Iraqi jihadist groups.

That same year, a branch of the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) issued hundreds of Iraqi passports for known terrorists.

There is much, much more. Documents reveal that the regime stockpiled bombmaking materials in Iraqi embassies around the world and targeted Western journalists for assassination. In July 2001, an Iraqi Intelligence agent described an al Qaeda affiliate in Bahrain, the Army of Muhammad, as "under the wings of bin Laden." Although the organization "is an offshoot of bin Laden," the fact that it has a different name "can be a way of camouflaging the organization." The agent is told to deal with the al Qaeda group according to "priorities previously established."

Direct Link to Page 2:

Saddam's Dangerous Friends

37 posted on 06/22/2008 3:55:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
Here is another one ( linking to a Youtube Video ) that you posted:

Al Qaeda Document: Zarqawi Came to Iraq Before The War (Jveritas AQ Translated Video)

******************INTRO***************

This is a FReeper made video based off the Al Qaeda document found and posted here at Free Republic by Jveritas.

Outstanding work by the way,.,,,,

38 posted on 06/22/2008 4:02:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All; Cindy; april15Bendovr; Alamo-Girl; NormsRevenge; elhombrelibre; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; ...

Feel free to add any links to FR threads or other site documents....we can treat this as one big Resource thread....


39 posted on 06/22/2008 4:04:53 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: freema; SE Mom; Brad's Gramma; doug from upland; BurbankKarl; A CA Guy; pollywog; bd476; lainie

fyi


40 posted on 06/22/2008 4:08:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: afortiori
This contradicts everything we know to be true.

ROFLOL!!!

41 posted on 06/22/2008 4:08:50 PM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Evidence of Iraq/Terrorism Connection?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342826/posts

Time to kick the tires & light the fires, folks- terrorism gathers across the World...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/838309/posts


42 posted on 06/22/2008 4:12:26 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thank you for post #38

We need all the help we can combating all the moonbat replies at Youtube.

43 posted on 06/22/2008 4:12:59 PM PDT by april15Bendovr (Free Republic & Ron Paul Cult = oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No Evidence Of A Saddam - Osama Link?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1783080/posts


44 posted on 06/22/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bm


45 posted on 06/22/2008 4:15:17 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Z-Man and Saddam? Ouch. Thank goodness we went into Iraq when we did.


46 posted on 06/22/2008 4:19:02 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What the Pentagon Report Missed (Richard Miniter)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1987463/posts


47 posted on 06/22/2008 4:23:51 PM PDT by nuconvert (Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; dotnetfellow

Thanks.


48 posted on 06/22/2008 4:25:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; tubebender; Gritty

fyi


49 posted on 06/22/2008 4:29:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All

His invasion of Iran and Kuwait demonstrated how insane the man could be.

Saddam Inssein would be a more appropriate name....

The name Saddam means "one who confronts" in Arabic....strangely appropriate, since he invaded everyone around him.
50 posted on 06/22/2008 4:32:15 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson