Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*LIVE THREAD* DC vs Heller decision due at 10:00 EST (2nd Amendment)
SCOTUS Blog ^ | 6-26-08 | shameless vanity

Posted on 06/26/2008 3:55:39 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat

Today is the day.

The folks at SCOTUS blog will be providing a live blog to follow developments as quickly as possible.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; bitter; elections; heller; judiciary; scalia; scotus; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
To: july4thfreedomfoundation

You are correct. It should have been 9-0. It was, as they say, a “no-brainer”.

With that said, I have just read Breyer’s dissent.

I can only conclude that he does not understand his job. He is more concerned about the potential adverse effects the decision might have on OTHER gun laws than with the Consitutional issues associated with this case.

Then again, maybe HE is just a “no-brainer”.


521 posted on 06/26/2008 7:48:43 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: mware

Amazing didn’t Obama announce yesterday that he disagreed with the courts ruling on the death penalty for child rapist??


522 posted on 06/26/2008 7:48:48 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

The few quotes I’ve heard of Scalia’s majority opinion seem beautifully written, establishing a firm precedent on the right to keep and bear arms... It seemed to me that he knew he was writing to establish a very clear affirmation of the Constitution’s protections here and, if the lousy liberals on the court have any real integrity regarding “precedent” this opinion should stand the test of time — hopefully forever.


523 posted on 06/26/2008 7:48:56 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
Getting Justices Alito and Scalia on the SC will stand as one of the President’s greatest accomplishments.

I'd say "the greatest" by far. This ruling is a huge day for America - the Supreme Court affirming 2nd Amendment rights is absolutely wonderful. Bravo, President Bush and Justice Scalia!

524 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:01 AM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved.

I think the keys words here are "citizens’ militia" in leu of an organized government military. If the "citizens" aren't allowed to own assembled and unlocked guns you can't have a well armed militia.

525 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:03 AM PDT by Walmartian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

That is probably the only way Kennedy would be part of it. Better that than the alternative, for now.


526 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:22 AM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: mware
By the way Obama released a comment saying he agrees with the courts decision.

Obama just doesn't vote that way.

Sen. Obama, in my neck of the woods that makes you a liar.

527 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:27 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Scalia in closing writes:

“Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment
is outmoded in a society where our standing army is
the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces
provide personal security, and where gun violence is a
serious problem. That is perhaps debatable, but what is
not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to
pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.”


528 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:33 AM PDT by tj21807
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: mware
Not that it needs to be said, but Obama is a shameless whore.
529 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:39 AM PDT by Vision ("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I bought a lot of stuff through Rasmus, in the past. As for need, is the sky blue?

What would be cool, is for some enterprising FReeper to set up a mirror site, or three...

530 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:54 AM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8
I am amazed at the power they have too, we can thank Chief Justice John Marshall who engineered the power grab back in 1803. I don’t think it is a good thing either.

I agree. They only have the power they do because of the consent of the governed. That consent should be withheld more frequently.

531 posted on 06/26/2008 7:49:55 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Yeah I would think he would want to snuff out gun owers, I guess that only applied to people who sell firearms.


532 posted on 06/26/2008 7:50:16 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

What this does is set the stage for further challenges, most likely to start in Chicago.

Just a step on the way, but an enormous one.


533 posted on 06/26/2008 7:50:25 AM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Basically, it’s going to require more lawsuits citing Heller as precedent. And in MA, for example, the judges up there will probably just ignore Heller and do whatever they want anyhow, even though the language is pretty clear.

It’s unfortunate that it even had to come to this. The language of the Constitution is plain and clear, and doesn’t need nine old farts in black robes to interpret it. The fact that we’ve got to sit here and hang on every word that comes out of the Supreme Court to find out if our clearly-stated right to keep and bear arms still exists after today...well, that right there is an indication of the coup that the judiciary has pulled off in this country in the last hundred years.

The Supremes largely made the right decision, but it should never have come to this point in the first place.

}:-)4


534 posted on 06/26/2008 7:50:40 AM PDT by Moose4 (http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

I’m sure our Dark Messiah Obama will be issuing a statement saying how ‘disappointed’ he is with this ruling.


535 posted on 06/26/2008 7:50:55 AM PDT by lado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

The number one reason why we MUST vote for McCain is because there will be a large DEMOCRAT majority in the senate. Obama will have a free reign to give us a bunch of Breyers and Stevens clones. Don’t count on the GOP senate to fillibuster anything either.


536 posted on 06/26/2008 7:51:36 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: fzx12345

Not that I see - but, NYC can no longer not issue permits for ownership, eg, unless they have an individual reason.


537 posted on 06/26/2008 7:51:36 AM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: mware
Socialists are not in favor of private gun owership.

Obama is no different.

538 posted on 06/26/2008 7:51:59 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
Maybe so, but can you imagine the fruitcakes Obama will nominate and who will skate through confirmation??

The first requirement will be a strong background as a "community organizer".

539 posted on 06/26/2008 7:52:00 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
My prediction: 7-2 against DC.

You weren't alone -- a lot of folks predicted either that or 6 - 3. Gave SCOTUS a little too much credit. NO surprise that (Ford appointed) Stevens and (Bush Sr. appointed) Souter went with the gun-grabbers on this. Thank God Alito replaced O'Conner; Sandy very well may have joined Ginsburg and Co. today.

540 posted on 06/26/2008 7:52:16 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,081-1,098 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson