Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2008 8:14:06 AM PDT by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mike Bates

bump


2 posted on 09/03/2008 8:17:41 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

TV, Interent, print - doesn’t matter. They are all in the same search and destroy mode. We are the enemy to their dreams of a socialist utopia with Messsiah BO.


3 posted on 09/03/2008 8:21:43 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (If the election were today, Obama would win.........in Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Who is going to take care of the 4-month-old while Sarah Palin travels the country campaigning? The 17-year-old? For the experience?

OMG. F--- these folks. The smears are unbelievable.

4 posted on 09/03/2008 8:22:08 AM PDT by library user (What say you, Messiah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

The headline on the MSN news portal page was “Aides Prepare Palin’s Speech.” Like she’s too stupid to do it herself.

Aides ALWAYS prepare for speeches. Would they have said that about Obama? Biden? I think not.


5 posted on 09/03/2008 8:24:04 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Mainstream Media, the Left is Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

I’d like to look back to see if there were similar letters to the editor concerning John Edward’s running for President during the time his wife was (and still is) dealing with breast cancer. By all rights, John should have been at home caring for his wife and their children ... Somehow, I doubt we’ll find them. Actually, the MSM played along and dragged as much sympathy out of it as was possible. And, when it was revealed that he had an affair WHILE HIS WIFE WAS DEALING WITH BREAST CANCER, the MSM said it was a “private family matter”. Parity?? Hardly.


6 posted on 09/03/2008 8:24:23 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Here in LA county eight of nine with the left over one avoiding open hostility would be considered fair and balanced.


7 posted on 09/03/2008 8:29:54 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Did Chicago Tribune Get Only Anti-Palin Letters to the Editor?

Of course not. But those are the only ones they would print.

The libs are in a full melt down. They're terrified of Governor Palin.

8 posted on 09/03/2008 8:38:19 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Once the Dems settle down they will issue talking points to their loyal subjects ineach state. Then they will send their letters to the editors.

What is funny is when you read such a letter in your local paper, then get a paper from another state and see the same letter in it but “written” by a different person.


10 posted on 09/03/2008 8:51:48 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
The remaining letter was a plea for "the birth control education and access" that kids "so obviously need."

The real subtext of the whole 17-year-old-unwed-mother story is that it paints the GOP as opposed to contraception as well as to abortion.

And that baggage is fatal unless the party unambiously refutes it, which it is failing to do.

11 posted on 09/03/2008 9:20:09 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

That’s exactly what happens at the Los Angeles Times. Most letters they publish support a liberal point of view that reflects the editorials and papers stance on things. Occasionally to be “fair” they will let in 1 letter that doesn’t support their way of thinking and bracket it with 2 letters that do. I look on the letters to the editor section of the LA Times as an extension of the editor’s position not the genuine voice of the people.


12 posted on 09/03/2008 9:33:27 AM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
Who is going to take care of the 4-month-old while Sarah Palin travels the country campaigning?

Who's been taking care of Obama's girls?

Note to Soledad O'Brien, who asked at 10:15 EDT today, "Why is questioning Gov Palin, sexist?" It's because you and your ilk wouldn't ask the same of BHO.

14 posted on 09/03/2008 9:48:13 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (If given a choice between a POW and a POS, I'll take the POW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

For some reason, I predict one of those 10% layoff articles about this paper in the near future.


15 posted on 09/03/2008 9:50:12 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates
This Chicago Tribune needs to hold on to what they started, namely when Obama run for the U.S. Senate this Tribune in their fairness zeal got a judge in California to open up divorce records of Obama’s Illinois opponent.
Obama in, Tribune on Obama lock step ever since.
Sorry they're just as shaky as the L.A. Times and try to sell the Cubs Baseball team to lift their sorry balances to stay afloat.
17 posted on 09/03/2008 12:34:26 PM PDT by hermgem (Will Olmr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

bump


22 posted on 09/03/2008 4:13:54 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

This morning in my local lib rag I read four letters-to-the-editors from four women concerning Palin. All were indignant about her nomination declaring that McCain nominated Palin just to get their vote. Well, they weren’t buying. (There were no pro-Palin letters.) I’d like to tell the self-absorbed twits who are anti-Palin that McCain nominted Palin to get the base, not the possible Hillary Clinton dissatisfied customers.


23 posted on 09/03/2008 5:46:16 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson