Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Second Amendment Enforcement Act Passes House, Moves to Senate
NRA - ILA ^ | September 17, 2008 | NA

Posted on 09/17/2008 9:55:35 AM PDT by neverdem


·11250 Waples Mill Road ·   Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683

D.C. Second Amendment Enforcement Act Passes House, Moves to Senate

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Fairfax, VA - The U.S. House of Representatives voted today to approve the National Rifle Association (NRA)-backed “Second Amendment Enforcement Act” in an overwhelming bi-partisan vote of 266-152. The Act, passed as an amendment to H.R. 6842, will overturn the District of Columbia’s gun control restrictions that defy the recent Supreme Court ruling by continuing to limit D.C. residents’ right to self-defense. This bill is necessary to enforce the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.

Following passage, Chris W. Cox, NRA’s chief lobbyist remarked, “From the moment the Supreme Court overturned this failed gun ban, elitist politicians have sought to undermine the Court’s decision with bogus emergency regulations that all but stop residents from exercising their Second Amendment rights. NRA wants to make sure D.C. residents are able to protect themselves and their families.”

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled “the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.”

A bi-partisan group of Congressmen introduced legislation this summer to force the D.C. Council into compliance with the Supreme Court after the council enacted ‘emergency’ gun-control restrictions on its residents after D.C.’s gun ban and self-defense ban were overturned.

The Second Amendment Enforcement Act will:

· Repeal the District’s ban on semi-automatic handguns. Semi-automatic pistols have been the most commonly purchased firearms in the United States over the last 20 years, and therefore a ban on those firearms is unconstitutional as decided by Heller;

· Restore the right of self-defense by repealing the requirement that firearms be disassembled or secured with a trigger lock in the home;

 · Reform the current D.C. registration system that requires multiple visits to police headquarters; ballistics testing; passing a written test on D.C. gun laws; fingerprinting; and limiting registration to one handgun per 90 days. The current system is unduly burdensome and serves as a vehicle for even more onerous restrictions; and

· Create a limited exemption to the federal ban on interstate handgun sales by allowing D.C. residents to purchase handguns in Virginia and Maryland. Currently there is only one licensed firearm dealer in the District, and the District government is standing in the way of additional dealers opening their doors. A 40-year old federal law prohibits residents from purchasing handguns outside of the District.

“I’d like to thank Congressmen Travis Childers, John Dingell, John Tanner, Mike Ross, Mark Souder, Bill Sali and Robin Hayes for their leadership. NRA will continue our work to bring the Second Amendment to D.C. residents, but we call on the Senate now to take up this historic legislation,” concluded Cox. “The American people should know where their elected representatives stand on this critical civil rights legislation before the November elections.”

-nra-

Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military.




Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=11548


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; banglist; congress; defense; elections; guns; heller; nobama08; nra; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
266-152, Yowza!
1 posted on 09/17/2008 9:58:09 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Which democrats were in favor?


2 posted on 09/17/2008 10:01:08 AM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Republicans and Blue Dogs helped get the measure passed. It should clear the Senate and President Bush will sign it. Yowza!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 09/17/2008 10:01:12 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

ALRIGHT! WE DID IT! Now DC residents can finally have their second amendment restored!


4 posted on 09/17/2008 10:02:18 AM PDT by mainestategop (MAINE: The way communism should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Someone explain to me why the Legislature is having to pass something to require the enforcement of the Constitution and a SCOTUS ruling supporting it???

The DOJ should be indicting every single person on the DC council who refuses to enforce that decision!

Why does nobody in government ever treat this kind of crap seriously? People should be in jail!

5 posted on 09/17/2008 10:05:40 AM PDT by TChris (Democrats: Where are we going? ...and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

YES. YES. YES. I want to see the vote count!!!!


6 posted on 09/17/2008 10:05:48 AM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Congress exercises, by the terms of the Constitution, exclusive jurisdiction over DC. What the House did was to tell DC's government is that it cannot pass a gun ordinance that is more restrictive than prevailing federal law. I'd like there to be a uniform federal concealed carry law too.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 09/17/2008 10:13:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop
ALRIGHT! WE DID IT! Now DC residents can finally have their second amendment restored!

ummmm, not until the Senate approves and Bush signs the bill.

Wonder how likely Senate libs will allow a vote on it before the election?

And of course if Nobama wins, it has no chance of ever being voted for in the Senate.

8 posted on 09/17/2008 10:15:41 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Someone explain to me why the Legislature is having to pass something to require the enforcement of the Constitution and a SCOTUS ruling supporting it???

Big bump to that! This is a civil rights issue and should be treated as such.

No different than poll taxes.

9 posted on 09/17/2008 10:16:25 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

It still has to pass Harry Reid’s Everything Stops Here Senate.


10 posted on 09/17/2008 10:16:27 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Its not clear when it will come up for a vote in the Senate. But the NRA has clout and politicians do pay attention - there are a lot of gun owners coming out to vote in this election.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 09/17/2008 10:18:13 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I'd like there to be a uniform federal concealed carry law too.

There already is one, it is called the 2nd amendment.

When I was a youngster, we always carried a gun in the car, a policeman thought nothing of finding a pistol in the glove box, or under the seat. I know from experience.

I can remember taking 22 rifles, or 410 shotguns to school, as to be able to hunt rabbits, squirrels or other food on the way home.

I am only 70, so people should be able to remember what we really are entitled to, and so easily surrendered to the government.

12 posted on 09/17/2008 10:49:06 AM PDT by itsahoot (We will have world government. The only question is whether by conquest or consent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: therut; wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; ...
YES. YES. YES. I want to see the vote count!!!!

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 601

This appears to be the roll call in question. Check this link to see how many pubbies also voted for Eleanor Holmes Norton's bill in committee. It's quite an exercise in hypocricy. So far that I checked - Souder, Sali, Issa and McHugh voted YEA on both versions, Childers' and Holmes' amendments.

As the House Gets Ready to Vote on Repealing the DC Gun Ban -- Your Representative now needs to hear from you

All corrections are always appreciated.

13 posted on 09/17/2008 10:52:46 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TChris

The DOJ should be indicting every single person on the DC council who refuses to enforce that decision


Indeed. However, they're busy with more important issues at the moment:

US Department of Justice awards NJIT $254,889 to continue developing gun technology



14 posted on 09/17/2008 11:02:19 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“152 Democrats vote to defy Constitution, United States Supreme Court.”


15 posted on 09/17/2008 11:05:13 AM PDT by 4buttons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4buttons

after posting the above, I’m wondering what republicans voted against it?


16 posted on 09/17/2008 11:06:51 AM PDT by 4buttons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Yeah, I want to see some indictments and jail time for violators.


17 posted on 09/17/2008 11:07:52 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Styria

southern democrats have to vote in favor of gun rights or they will not get elected. even the biggest liberal in alabama probably grew up with guns. that is why you will never see southern politicians debate gun rights. they will get recalled! especially rural representatives. i would guess many of the nay votes were from northeastern democrats and republicans. or northwestern in some capacity. just a guess.


18 posted on 09/17/2008 11:12:58 AM PDT by thefactor (contributing nothing of value to threads since 2001...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4buttons
after posting the above, I’m wondering what republicans voted against it?

---- NOES 152 ---

The names that were in italics, the pubbies equivalent of yellow/blue dogs:

Castle, Gilchrest, King (NY), Kirk, Ramstad, Shays and Smith (NJ).

The bad news is that to get the House back, we'll have to keep them. The good news was 266 votes for the NRA bill.

19 posted on 09/17/2008 11:22:44 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Styria
Which democrats were in favor?

Click on the first link in comment# 13.

20 posted on 09/17/2008 11:33:30 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson