Posted on 10/07/2008 6:34:24 PM PDT by Dajjal
Berg is “Outraged” that Obama & DNC Hide Again Behind Legal Issues as their attorney files a Motion for Protective Order to “not” Answer Admissions & Production of Documents while Betraying Public in not Producing Documents proving Obama is “qualified” to be a candidate for President.
It is believed Obama is an “illegal alien” For Immediate Release: - 10/06/08
(Contact info and pdf of press release below)
Country is Headed to a Constitutional Crisis
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/06/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and Democratic National Committee [DNC] filed a Joint Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery Pending a Decision on the Motion to Dismiss (which was) filed on 09/24/08.
While legal, Berg stated he is “outraged as this is another attempt to hide the truth from the public; it is obvious that documents do not exist to prove that Obama is qualified to be President.” The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Their joint motion indicates a concerted effort to avoid the truth by attempting to delay the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue presented: that is, whether Barack Obama meets the qualifications to be President.
It is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does not meet the “qualifications” to be President of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution. Obama cannot produce a certified copy of his “Vault” [original long version] Birth Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.
Furthermore, and actually more important is Obama’s Certificate of Citizenship that he received when he returned from Indonesia, as if it exists it would indicate that Obama was “naturalized” and also not able to be President.
The DNC has promised “we the people” an Open and Honest Government and has promised to uphold our United States Constitution. The DNC has failed their promise. DNC Chairperson Howard Dean should resign as he has not and is not fulfilling his responsibility of seeing that a “qualified” candidate is on the ballot as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States.
Berg stated that a response in opposition will be filed in the next day or so to the Defendants Motion for a Protective Order.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 21.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
Suppose irrefutable proof of a foreign birth is ‘found’ after the election and Obama has won? What happens then? And even if he loses? And I’m a little curious to know why Hillary isn’t more curious about her former opponent? It’s a little different than Kerry hiding his papers regarding the war.
Are they afraid the father will be listed as...could it be Satan?
I think that is obvious
btt
You nailed this one. If Obama is elected, I can hardly wait for the Supreme Court to have to make a ruling.
constitution is amazingly detailed
I understand but........
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
But the website refers to him as an illegal alien.
There are only three requirements listed. While the age and residency requirements are pretty clear-cut, the term "natural born" is left to other sources to define.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
INTREP
Berg's argument goes something like this: When Lolo Soetoro married Sydney Dunham and formally adopted Barry he conferred Indonesian citizenship upon them both; and they both lost their US citizenship (because the US recognizes dual citizenship only with nations that do likewise, which Indonesia does not).
When Sydney divorced him and returned to Hawaii, she ought to have renounced her Indonesian citizenship before a judge or authority in order to restore her US citizenship (as a "[re]naturalized" citizen; not as a "natural born" citizen); Barry / Barack should have done this when he reached the age of majority.
Berg strongly suspects that neither of them ever did this. He is demanding to see BHO's signed loyalty oath and is getting stonewalled.
If BHO never even became a "[re]naturalized citizen" then he is still an Indonesian, and has illegally resided in the US, run for public offices in Illinois, etc.
[N.B. Berg would need to establish that Lolo did formally adopt Barry; Barry was probably too old a child to obtain Indonesian citizenship automatically by his mother's marriage to an Indonesian, under Indonesian law. At least, this is how I understand the allegations.]
I agree with the concept. Obama can make this ALL GO AWAY by simply showing the necessary documents. Once he does that it’s CASE CLOSED. By doing that, he would make Berg and his supporters look like fools.
But he’s “lawyering up” on such a simple, slam dunk response.
Can someone get a copy of this from the actual public records in Pennsylvania? “Obama Crimes” doesn’t seem like the best source for this, if it is in fact a real document.
...and, supposedly, infant footprint...
Thanks.
Wow, I didn’t know this was so deep.
I thought that the judge ruled against their motion to dismiss or is an appeal?
I've just checked the best sources, and unless something has happened in the last few minutes and is not online anywhere, Judge R. Barclay Surrick has not yet ruled one way or the other on the BHO/DNC motion to dismiss.
I haven't used it but the actual court documents are all on the site used as a source for this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095499/posts
Berg files motion asking court to deny Obama's dismissal request [No order]
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ^ | October 1, 2008 | JustiaDocs
Posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:16:50 PM by conservativegramma
As I said, I haven't used it, but I recall a Freeper posting that on JustiaDocs (docs.justia.com) you can view (or was it print?) the first 90 pages for free, and after that there was some nominal charge per page. I think it was 90 -- but check their rules yourself before you enter.
I do not know if JustiaDocs is technically the same as the PACER System (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). If they are different, I haven't used the PACER System either. They also have a nominal charge. Here is the url for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania subsite of PACER:
http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/us01001.asp
Note also that the parties have typically been filing their motions late in the day; so if Berg slips something over the desk at 4:59 PM it won't be on the official site until the next working day, whereas the Freepers and bloggers and PUMAs will have it up at their websites right away.
Thanks for reminding me -- that would be extremely useful!!!!!
so someone is full of doodoo when they say that he has ruled their motion to dismiss.
(unless it's just happened) ... ABSOLUTELY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.