and the RATS, take another one in the.................................HA ha!!!
Posted on 10/10/2008 3:12:21 PM PDT by Amityschild
Last December, someone using the name “Test Person,” from “Some Place, UT,” made a series of contributions, the largest being $764, to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign totaling $2,410.07.
Someone identifying himself as “Jockim Alberton,” from 1581 Leroy Avenue in Wilmington, Del., began giving to Mr. Obama last November, contributing $10 and $25 at a time for a total of $445 through the end of February.
The only problem? There is no Leroy Avenue in Wilmington. And Jockim Alberton, who listed his employer and occupation as “Fdsa Fdsa,” does not show up in a search of public records.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The local newspaper in my small town has carried NOTHING on these scandals. The local labor unions have purchased advertising billboards all over town expounding on how the Democrats will bring back honesty in government and prosperity in jobs if only everyone votes Democrat this time around. Hell, they all voted Democrat the last time around!
Republicans are a minority here and generally keep their heads down. Since this is a mill town in SW Washington state, the unions have great pull with the voters, who are union members. Small business owners are usually Republican. Where Republicans have some influence ii’s on issues such as abortion and gun rights. Most union people here are social conservatives who hunt and wouldn’t vote for Obama even if he were the only politician on the ballot.
I truly have no inkling of how my county will vote come this November.
GNIP...
Don’t these people have a real name on their credit card???? How does this happen???????????
Today, the KLBJ morning show had a blip about someone from Goodwill in Austin [in the name of Loving, You] that made multiple donations to the BO.
Maybe... but I bet the Credit Card they used was not in the name of “jkbkj”, and I also bet it had a real address associated with it....:^)
The word "fictitious" brought the NYT comfort and they just had to print the story.
Thanks Amityschild.
Why?
When the ranking members of the DNC realize that they are going to face some serious jail time for voter fraud, for racketeering, for financial fraud, for money laundering, for legal abuses, for violating the Constitution, for violating the Logan Act, for violating even the Patriot Act, for causing the sub-prime mortgage crisis and bank crisis, guess who will be the ONE tossed under the bus this time?
What's McCain's theme for this election? "America first, liars last."
All it would take to topple this house of cards is for McCain, during the final debate, to make one or more of these simple requests of Obama:
"Prove who you say you are."
Show us the vault copy of your birth certificate."
"Show us the passports you used to travel to Pakistan and Indonesia."
"Tell us why you have been lying about your past, your associates, your campaign finances, your ties to ACORN, your ties to terrorists, your role in the mortgage crisis and bank crisis, and your efforts to steal this election. and disenfranchise the American voter?"
"Senator, the American public deserves to hear the truth about Barack Hussein Obama, if that's even your real name."
"Woludn't thaty be loeverly?"
No wonder we haven’t seen Hillary around for a while.
She must be spending a lot of time feeding those old FBI files into The New York Times and other bottom feeders.
“On Monday the Republican National Committee filed a complaint against the Obama campaign with the F.E.C., questioning the legitimacy of the more than $220 million in small donations to Mr. Obama’s campaign.”
One would think this kind of information would make the evening news on the Tube.
Urban Dictionary: FDSA
1. fdsa. Used to show anger, get ones attention, or show confusion. ... FDSA. F* **ing D*** Sucking A**hole. Alex: Get the f*** of my girl ShayneFDSA! ...
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FDSA - 16k - Cached - Similar pages
Just look at the California donation list. There are dozens of people who have given in excess of the $2300 allowed by law.
Why not? The arrogant bastards know that nothing will come of it.
These numbers were far huger than the "fictitious".
I think Bill Lockyer, CA, said it best when stumping for Democrats: We only obey the laws we agree with.
The money they gave wasn't fictitious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.