Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sustainability can be a warm, fuzzy word that invites tyranny
Minneapolis Star Tribune ^ | October 11, 2008 | KATHERINE KERSTEN

Posted on 10/12/2008 5:17:27 PM PDT by rhema

Today's socially conscious student finds it tough to keep up with all the latest buzzwords. He wants to be for "social justice" and against "institutional racism." He's keen to be seen as an "environmentalist," a "multiculturalist" and an "anti-imperialist."

The list, so to speak, goes on.

Wouldn't life be simpler if all the correct labels could be captured in just one word?

That magic word is here, and it's taking college campuses by storm.

The abracadabra bon mot is "sustainability."

In Minnesota, you'll find talk of sustainability at institutions ranging from public giants such as the University of Minnesota to community colleges, as well as private liberal arts colleges such as Macalester, St. Olaf and St. Thomas. Across the nation, institutions of higher education are adding sustainability to their strategic goals, and hiring a growing army of coordinators and bureaucrats to make it a reality on campus. Umbrella groups are popping up like mushrooms, bearing tongue-twisting names like the U.S. Partnership for Education for Sustainable Development and the Higher Education Associations Sustainability Consortium.

But what, exactly, does "sustainability" mean? It has the ring of improving the environment, and conjures up images of low-voltage light bulbs and farmers markets. If so, say many folks, bring it on.

Some institutions of higher learning, such as the University of Minnesota, do have a scientific, environmental focus and initiatives led by biologists and ecologists. But to a significant extent, the beauty of "sustainability" is that it can mean whatever you want it to mean.

In many cases, folks with a burning desire to transform the world are using the concept to piggy-back on legitimate environmental concerns, and get a foot in the door for every leftist cause under the sun.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: agenda21; sustainability

1 posted on 10/12/2008 5:17:27 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


Same bunch...
2 posted on 10/12/2008 5:19:05 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

It never ends. There’s always some codeword for restricting the freedom of the masses in order for the beknighted to save us.


3 posted on 10/12/2008 5:20:13 PM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I’m not even going to bother to read the comments from the peanut gallery at the Strib.....


4 posted on 10/12/2008 5:20:22 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR....Monthly Donors Wanted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

It’s too bad words like “diversity” and “sustainability” are used as tools of government intervention and force by the left and sell outs on the right. Fundamentally there is nothing wrong with said words and they are actually a good thing.


5 posted on 10/12/2008 5:20:51 PM PDT by djsherin (The federal government: Because your life isn't screwed up enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Why isn’t the rationale of ‘sustainability’ ever applied to something with clear, real world consequences — like whether Medicare and Social Security are ‘sustainable.’


6 posted on 10/12/2008 5:25:47 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I’m not even going to bother to read the comments from the peanut gallery at the Strib.....

You tote some self respect via conviction my FRiend.

Like minds....

7 posted on 10/12/2008 5:26:12 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

My truck crapped out on me this afternoon.....

I just don’t need anymore grief in my life, right now....

;-)


8 posted on 10/12/2008 5:29:31 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR....Monthly Donors Wanted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The easy counter to the “sustainability” argument is that socialism is inherently unstable and inefficient, and thus is unsustainable.

It is unable to provide what it promises, and continually demands more resources to provide less functionality. In addition, socialists seem to lack pattern recognition, treating the failure of socialism with pseudo-religious denial instead of objectively revising failed theory.

Ironically, socialism matters more to socialists than solving any problem. In fact, they demonstrate indifference and even hostility to any means of reform, repair, or improvement that does not conform to their doctrines.

As such, socialism is almost the very definition of “unsustainable.”


9 posted on 10/12/2008 5:29:44 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo; Caleb1411
I’m not even going to bother to read the comments from the peanut gallery at the Strib.....

How 'bout just one:

It's the liberals' motto...
Free speech for me, but not for thee.

10 posted on 10/12/2008 5:32:33 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“Sustainability:” keeping small builders from competing with big developers. I know of environmentalist front women who’ve worked directly for such developers and then indirectly in local politics.


11 posted on 10/12/2008 5:32:33 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
What might "education for a sustainable society" look like? In 2006, Keith Edwards of Macalester and Kathleen Kerr of the University of Delaware outlined their vision at a national conference.

It's a myth that sustainability is "mostly about the environment," they assured their audience. Its reach extends to issues ranging from "environmental racism" and "domestic partnerships" to "gender equity" and "fair trade."

Macalester. Why are we not surprised?

12 posted on 10/12/2008 5:38:35 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

iz reloading your own ammo sustainability?


13 posted on 10/12/2008 5:43:54 PM PDT by kennyboy509 (Ha! I kill me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

now you’re cooking with Crisco! I can agree with this logic wholeheartedly... only self-actualized individualism can be sustainable... keep this thread going!


14 posted on 10/12/2008 5:45:12 PM PDT by Grain Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The correct definition of sustainable has to be botched to fit the false doctrines of the day.

Trees are the greatest sustainable resource for building materials and the rules to make a house green involves using less trees. Environmentalists disapprove of the Sustainable Forest Initiative.


15 posted on 10/12/2008 5:58:46 PM PDT by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The illegitimate basstirds are steelin our languige an givin it back to the old country yourapeeins!!!


16 posted on 10/12/2008 6:08:51 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Obama... Just another lying Commonist Communutty Organizing thug from the south side of Chicago!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

It’s also the virtual definition of “Moral Hazzard” which just creamed our unsustainable mortgage madness due to the Communutty Redevelopment Act signed by Jimmy “the peanut head” Carter, Janet “the man” Reno of Clinton infamy and now by Barney “JuicyFruit” Frank and Nancy “stretch” Pelousie!!!


17 posted on 10/12/2008 6:15:07 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Obama... Just another lying Commonist Communutty Organizing thug from the south side of Chicago!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“’Sustainability’ is but the latest euphemism for ‘subsistence’.” (c) Clint Williams


18 posted on 10/12/2008 6:49:01 PM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
That magic word is here, and it's taking college campuses by storm.

The abracadabra bon mot is "sustainability."

I am a Mechanical Engineer with 15 years in steam power (coal and nuclear), a brief stint in chemical plant operation, and lately am doing large HVAC design for commercial and industrial customers.

I can't tell you how disgusted I feel these days when in a meeting with an Architect or a customer and they start spouting LEED, Green, and Sustainability. I struggle to keep my mouth shut because I am not in a position that I can tell them to stuff if, but it makes me feel ill.

People with NO engineering background are making engineering decisions based on feel good PC movement propaganda. We are in trouble.

19 posted on 10/13/2008 6:27:07 AM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
That magic word is here, and it's taking college campuses by storm.

The abracadabra bon mot is "sustainability."

I am a Mechanical Engineer with 15 years in steam power (coal and nuclear), a brief stint in chemical plant operation, and lately am doing large HVAC design for commercial and industrial customers.

I can't tell you how disgusted I feel these days when in a meeting with an Architect or a customer and they start spouting LEED, Green, and Sustainability. I struggle to keep my mouth shut because I am not in a position that I can tell them to stuff if, but it makes me feel ill.

People with NO engineering background are making engineering decisions based on feel good PC movement propaganda. We are in trouble.

20 posted on 10/13/2008 6:27:52 AM PDT by SteamShovel (Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson