Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
ObamaCrimes.com Phillip Berg ^ | 10/25/2008 | Phillip j. Berg

Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae

Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end. UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

# # #

Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: antichrist; berg; birthcertificate; certifigate; citizenship; leftwingconspiracy; obama; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last
To: Danae
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Just posting this for viewing.

41 posted on 10/25/2008 4:11:37 PM PDT by right way right (Do not mistake religion for God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

She may have standing yes. She was a candidate, so yes she would have standing. Only problem is, she seems to be marching in lock step atm....


42 posted on 10/25/2008 4:12:02 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Danae

That’s because the (mis)interpretation of the Constitution regarding Congress’s ability to lay and collect taxes.

See. It’s for the ‘good’ of the people.(peons)


43 posted on 10/25/2008 4:13:22 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

The .tiff of the ruling is here :

http://www.flds.ws/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/obama-surricks-10242008-ruling.tif


44 posted on 10/25/2008 4:13:35 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Danae
That is because the Congress passed the tax laws and the citizens have agreed (per the Constitution) to follow the laws.

Here, we are demanding that SOEMONE enforce the Constitutional rules regarding presidential qualifications. That is the court's role and if they won't do their job, then its up to the people. If Obama is not qualified to serve as president and he's sworn in anyway. The people should challenge their illegitimate government. Could get mighty ugly.

45 posted on 10/25/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: right way right

Never hurts to post facts. :^)


46 posted on 10/25/2008 4:14:43 PM PDT by eyedigress ( My first 4 wheeler was on the rocks in Fairbanks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Danae

You can email the people in charge of elections and ballots for various states at http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/cfsdd/cfsdd.shtml#Contents

Just click on the state you live in and email them about your concerns for proof of eligibilty for office.


47 posted on 10/25/2008 4:14:44 PM PDT by mombi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

What is the connection?


48 posted on 10/25/2008 4:14:52 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Read the Supreme Court sentence in advance
http://illuminati-religion.blogspot.com/2008/10/barry-soetoro-aka-messiah-barack.html


49 posted on 10/25/2008 4:15:05 PM PDT by VlPu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington
Actually, if the Constitution fails, we then belong to Great Britain. So let's ask Queen Elisabeth II to check out Obama’s qualifications. If he turns out to be a fake, she gets her country back!
50 posted on 10/25/2008 4:15:53 PM PDT by April Lexington (I'm voting for McCain in 2008 and Jefferson Davis in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I think we are already in a constitutional crisis. Who the hell is suppose to vet a presidential nominee. Supposedly, the DNC. Well what happens if the DNC is doing a cover up OR a covert communist/marxist/etc fooled them.

Who gets to the bottom of it?

I can’t understand how the people of the United States do not have standing to find out if someone is eligible to run for president.

How can it be frivolous if a black grandmother says she was at the birth of her grandson IN KENYA.

I just really can’t believe this is happening.

Between all the voter fraud from Acorn and this issue...I think he will steal the election.

This Arab Muslim with a mysterious past is saying TRUST ME. TRUST MY SOCIALIST IDEAS. TRUST MY DUBIOUS CONNECTIONS. TRUST MY RELATIVES including the one who believes in SHARIA law. TRUST ACORN. BELIEVE........

I am damn scared for our country that more people aren’t concerned about what is happening.


51 posted on 10/25/2008 4:16:45 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Attempted Hail Mary. That being said, I hope he personally handed his appeal brief to Antonin Scalia.


52 posted on 10/25/2008 4:17:23 PM PDT by sono (I'm Senator Government and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born In America

Can I not think a person is spot on in one issue and disagree with him on a totally separate issue? Or is your point that I should have omitted any issue I have with his views?

If you will take the time to look at my posts, I think you will find that I am not a troll. I have lost plenty of sleep, time, sanity and countless other things to this election. Please call 954-925-1707 at the southeast victory office to verify my volunteer hours. If you will email me, I will give you my first name. Sheesh!


53 posted on 10/25/2008 4:17:28 PM PDT by lovesdogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: VlPu

OK, where are the Free Republic legal scholars, I assume they will say this has a one percent chance of being taken up by the Supreme Court.

Let’s go in fantasy world, if the Supreme Court agreed to hear this case, do we have the numbers????


54 posted on 10/25/2008 4:17:49 PM PDT by MikeFrancesa.com (www.war69.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

Roe vs Wade is a perfect case where 1 citizen sued to overturn a law and won before the SCOTUS...


55 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:22 PM PDT by billmor (May God Bless Sen. McCain, Gov Palin and our beloved Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Portrait of a Lady

Wait a minute, you mean Surricks Clerk is a BIG obama donator and worked with Michelle???


56 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:23 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Danae

The request will go to Justice Kennedy...

IMO the heart of the suit boils down to: should a candidate have to prove he is eligible, or should a challenger (and I do think any citizen should have standing) have to prove he isn’t?


57 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:26 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Sounds like Berg Esq. needs to be releasing one of those vids he claims to have in an effort to bolster his filing....


58 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:27 PM PDT by deport ( ----Cue Spooky Music---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence. To make it possible for the average person to question the qualifications of a candidate for President. This is either a Pandora's Box, or a chance for the average Man to have a say with just cause to do so.

Wrong. The problem is that there is no specific law deliniating who exactly has the right {standing} to legally raise the question of a person's birthplace qualification to be President of the United States as demanded in the Constitution. The Constitution itself does not say.

59 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:34 PM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (The FairTax -- the largest magnet for capital and jobs in history. John Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
A great quote indeed, but the G. A. is not a corollary to the Constitution and thus has no judicial weight.

Does this have judicial weight?

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. "

60 posted on 10/25/2008 4:18:34 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Prepare for rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson