Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin is Far Too Much Fun to Send Back to Alaska
Seattle Intelligencer ^ | October 29, 2008 3:11 p.m. PT | Dale McFeatters

Posted on 10/30/2008 8:23:40 AM PDT by lewisglad

Palin is too much fun to send back to Alaska DALE MCFEATTERS

WASHINGTON -- Just when things seemed darkest for the journalism racket the news gods smiled -- only briefly, as it turned out -- and bestowed Sarah Palin upon us.

However the campaign turns out, we can't let her go back to Alaska. She's too much fun.

Just recently she was the cause of a great new contribution to our political vocabulary -- "gone rogue." As in a McCain campaign insider's observation that in Palin's increasing tendency to depart from the script prepared for her the vice presidential candidate "has gone rogue on us."

The campaign seemed stunned that the woman they proudly labeled a "maverick" maybe really is a maverick.

The New York Times had a very funny account of Palin suddenly stopping to take questions from a local TV crew and her traveling press corps. The Times account of what followed:

" 'Get Tracey,' one campaign aide barked into his headset, calling for Tracey Schmitt, Palin's ever-watchful spokeswoman, who rushed over to supervise the impromptu press conference. (Schmitt, looking distressed, tried several times to cut it off with a terse 'Thank you!' in between questions, to no avail.)"

Later that day Palin again broke free from her handlers to talk to the reporters, causing one to observe later that she was evolving "from the least accessible to the most accessible of the four candidates."

All this has led to the sort of speculation we in the dwindling band of mainstream media love. John Dickerson wrote " ... political insiders have started asking whether Palin is intentionally ignoring the playbook. And if it's intentional, the question becomes: Is she putting her own political self-interest ahead of her running mate's?"

The political pundits were ready with an answer. Roger Simon wrote in Politico, "Sarah Palin may soon be free. Soon, she may not have the millstone of John McCain around her neck. And she can begin her race for president in 2012."

We haven't even finished the longest, most grueling presidential race in our history and already we're talking about the next one. Palin in '12. And why not? The right wing of the Republican Party, the only wing that counts -- at least until next Tuesday, loves her so she has a ready-made base.

But she can't run from president from Alaska. Reporters will go to Iowa in January and New Hampshire in February but asking them to go to Alaska is a bit much. Besides, the time zones just kill you on deadlines.

The cell door hasn't even slammed shut on poor old Ted Stevens and already there is speculation -- and the Internet has given a tremendous boost to the groundless speculation industry -- that she will appoint herself to his Senate seat if he has to resign.

Her supporters say that short of the vice presidency she would never trade Alaska for Washington, D.C. But maybe not. The flap over the $150,000 wardrobe gave rise to even more speculation. (The McCain campaign says it returned a third of the wardrobe but that still leaves $100,000 worth of glad rags.)

Tina Brown, the former editor of The New Yorker who knows about these matters, says, "The notion that after the campaign they'll make her give the new wardrobe back, by the way, is palpably ridiculous. Don't we want Sarah Palin to look hot?" We do, we do.

She says no woman who has worn a $2,500 silk Valentino jacket is going to go back to wearing consignment shop clothes or, having had a personal hairdresser, to having her hair done at the Beehive in Wasilla.

Brown too thinks Palin is now campaigning for her future more than the ticket. Love her or hate her -- Christopher Hitchens calls her "a religious fanatic and a proud, boastful ignoramus" -- in two short months, Sarah Palin has made it hard to imagine politics without her.

You betcha.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: lewisglad
Sarah Palin has made it hard to imagine politics without her.

I never want to know what that would be like.

21 posted on 10/30/2008 8:47:53 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Who is the real Barack Obama? Stand up Chuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
She’s going to Washington DC, so no worry about Alaska.

It's almost sad when you think about it. She's leaving beautiful Alaska for the cesspool that is Washington, DC. She has to know that the media is going to absolutely bombard her and her family nonstop. I know it's for the greater good and all, but what a sacrifice she and her family are making! That, my FRiend, is PATRIOTISM.....and I hope Plugs chokes on it when it happens, too......

22 posted on 10/30/2008 8:48:52 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
If Palin had made the "J-O-B-S" gaffe, we would never hear the end of it. She is demonstrably smarter (to say nothing of more humble) than Biden.

And yet the media insists, demands that we not believe our lying eyes.

23 posted on 10/30/2008 8:51:15 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("[Obama acts] as if the very idea of permanent truth is passe, a form of bad taste"-Shelby Steele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

If you would have even cared to look, I was the one posting articles that said the Virgina polls were wrong. (and for McCaiun/Palin voters to turn out)


24 posted on 10/30/2008 8:52:00 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

The same way a Palin-hater can, slowly over time
or perhaps even better they can become extinct.


25 posted on 10/30/2008 8:52:13 AM PDT by kanawa (http://www.canadalovessarah.ca/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
">
26 posted on 10/30/2008 8:52:55 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Don’t laugh, all the repubs I talk to up here are still voting for Uncle Teddy; for this very reason. But, you know; Sarah Palin is just honest enough that she wouldn’t appoint herself.

I first met/talked to Sarah Palin in 1995. I’ve watched all that she went thru; how she never lost her integrity. She’ll be back whatever occurs; best political I’ve ever seen.


27 posted on 10/30/2008 8:54:00 AM PDT by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I’m thinking that she’ll be following in her mom’s footsteps!


28 posted on 10/30/2008 8:56:02 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Want change? Vote new blood into Congress where the purse-strings reside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Yes, indeed! A future politician.
29 posted on 10/30/2008 8:58:20 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Want change? Vote new blood into Congress where the purse-strings reside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eska

How about Todd Palin for US Senate? The First Dude could pull a Hillary!


30 posted on 10/30/2008 8:58:33 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Russ
She isn’t going back to Alaska for any longer than it takes to pack her bags for Washington in January.

I bet to differ, the Iron Dog race is in February.....

31 posted on 10/30/2008 9:00:18 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Spreading manure around helps growth. Spreading wealth around creates manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Durn, I hoped they meant that in a good way, then I saw where it was from. What is this “news god” of which they speak, does he have horns and cloven feet?


32 posted on 10/30/2008 9:01:07 AM PDT by Peter Horry (Mount Up Everybody and Ride to the Sound of the Guns .. Pat Buchanan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

Sorry to correct you, but not a future politician, rather a future LEADER like Mom....


33 posted on 10/30/2008 9:01:48 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lonestar; lewisglad

And Christopher Hitchens is a boastful arrogant drunk who can’t seem to comprehend the words “last call.”


34 posted on 10/30/2008 9:01:49 AM PDT by Clemenza (PRIVATIZE FANNIE AND FREDDIE! NO MORE BAILOUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
The PI’s headline implies Obama has already won. Not so. Got news for the writer. Sarah may not be going anywhere but to D.C. for the next 4-8 years.
35 posted on 10/30/2008 9:03:34 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Is she putting her own political self-interest ahead of her running mate's?

No, she's putting the country's interest ahead of John McCain's desire to hand over the presidency to a Marxist by default.

36 posted on 10/30/2008 9:04:34 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Well, that was kind of my point although I was leaving it kind of broad incase she decides a different route than her mom.


37 posted on 10/30/2008 9:06:32 AM PDT by beachn4fun (Want change? Vote new blood into Congress where the purse-strings reside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I agree with her on most issues. Her public persona is attractive. And her children are adorable. So far, I have good reason to like Gov. Palin.


38 posted on 10/30/2008 9:08:45 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

I know, I was just pickin’....


39 posted on 10/30/2008 9:10:51 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
And Christopher Hitchens is jealous, just like all "over-educated", "over cultured", "more advanced" two-leggeds who seem to forget we're all in it together.

In my own close family I have both a Hitchens & and a Palin.

I love the both, but I do relish my "alone" time.

40 posted on 10/30/2008 9:24:45 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson