Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate confirmed

Pacific Business News (Honolulu) ^ | Friday, October 31, 2008

[Tahts-a-dats-ago]

The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed on Friday what Barack Obama has been saying all along: the presidential candidate was born in Honolulu.

snipped...

http://www.bizjournals.com/pacific/stories/2008/10/27/daily60.html

[Cicero]

Does someone dare respond to the source article linked at the top and point out that the Hawaiian authorities did NOT say that the birth certificate says that Obama was born in Hawaii? All they say is that they have a copy of the vault birth certificate and are refusing to release it. Therefore the headline is an outright lie, as even a careful reading of the article confirms.

Frankly, I don’t dare do it, because you would have to give your name and email address before posting a response, and I don’t want the Obama Gestapo coming down on me and my family.

Maybe someone could do it who is an internet techie, so he knows how to give a fake name and make himself untraceable? So far, there are only two dumb responses to the article.

[Candor7]

The Hawaii DoH at the request of the Republican governor has verified Obama's Hawaian birth.>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS IS A LIE.

Hawaii Law allows for a Birth Certificate to be issued to foreign born applicants.

The records are supressed because Obamas defacto birth, as required by the US Constitution to be within the USA, was in Kenya.

THAT'S WHY OBAMA HAS SPENT OVER A MILLION BUCKS TO SUPRESS THIS INFORMATION

OBAMA BORN IN KENYA> YELL IT OUT!!!!!!

[The Californian]

What I wonder most about is:

1) Who is responsible for checking credentials. (I have made at least 20 phone calls, and cannot find an answer.) Who is NOT responsible is the Secretary of State, the Governor, the Senate, the DNC or RNC, the FEC, the National Archives (run the electoral college) and apparently US Citizens cannot sue to find out. I don’t even know who else to call.

2) Why do “we” (the people) have to prove he is NOT eligible. Why does Senator Obama not have to prove he IS eligible.

3) Why don’t all presidential and vice presidential candidates, as a matter of course and record, release their documentation proving their eligibility.

4) Why are we forced, by default, to make a decision on the absence of information, rather than an abundance of information.

If there are any constitutianal authorities available, I would appreciate a common sense answer to the things I am wondering about.

Does anyone know if Greta came to any conclusion? If so, where do I find it.

I have contated my State Representative and asked him to bring to California a simple legislative effort which gives the right, responsibility and obligation to the Secretary of State to confirm ANYONE to our California Ballot BEFORE they go on. At this time the Secretary of State from California cannot confirm that Obama is eligible, but can confirm that McCain is.

Our Secretary of State is not able to confirm eligibility before putting them on the ballot at this time.

A legislative effort is necessary. If you live in California, please contact your State Representatives. If California had this as their requirement, it would be impossible for anyone serious about running for President to ever again put us in this position. (70 electoral votes)

We don’t have to change the whole country, just a few states, and California is one of them.

Thanks

[DoughtyOne]

Yep. Take our word for it. He’s a citizen. Run along now...

But we would like documentation. Sorry, we can’t provide documentation.

Did he switch his citizenship to Indonesian? We don’t know about that.

Have you asked the Kenyan government for any documentation? That’s not important.

It’s amazing the cavalier attitude when a Democrat is suspect of something. Everyone from Nixon to the current George Bush, you have to prove their innocence. Carter to Clinton, you have to prove their guilt, without any government provided documents. Those are sealed.

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks for the video.

[LucyT]

Ping.

-

The US Constitution requires that a president be natural born in the United States.

It is not a fringe element. It is a surpressed mainstream element.

And Obama has spent over a million dollars suppressing and manipulating it, which is NEWS in itself.

Why not produce the document instead of locking down otherwise publicly available data, and spend a million bucks or more doing it?

THAT IS A STORY. And it needs to be in print before Nov. 4th.

175 posted on Saturday, November 01, 2008 8:40:47 AM by Candor7

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2121386/posts?page=175#175

-

Please check out this comment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2121386/posts?page=183#183

-

Adding a link.
Thanks to nw_arizona_granny for finding this:

London Times Inquires About “Dreams” Fraud

http://www.cashill.com

[Jeff Head]

Did he produce a certified certificate of birth for others to see and examine?

[freekitty]

That’s right. All they say is they have a bc for Obama according to their procedures.

[danamco]

o: BIGLOOK; SE Mom; danamco; penelopesire; Miss Didi; rodguy911; pissant; Grampa Dave; Bahbah; ... For what it’s worth, video of his African grandmother speaking about BHO from Berg.

The tape worked last night, but not today. Somebody must have blocked it!!!

[Miss Didi]

It just worked for me.

[jetson]

Email Governor Lingle and ask her if this is legit. I did.

governor.lingle@hawaii.gov

[danamco]

An alias. In which he doesn’t have a legal history of a name change. He put no aliases when he applied for his law license. Therefore, he has an illegal name on the election ballot.

That may also play into his applications for college/universities, as "falsehoods." Maybe FOIA should apply here???

His whole secrets are very suspiciously!!!

[STARWISE]

1st link didn’t work for me just now.
This one does ... but the translations
and possibilities of the language
interpretation still make it a vague
conclusion IMO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiJS0fCf0Js

[danamco]

I also e-mailed her last night, that by her action of sealing his BC, she becomes an enabler, toward creating a Constitutional crises, and I asked her for that reason, since she had let TWO (2) other individuals looking at it, which is contradiction to protect his privacy = (only a relative, etc.) would be privy to look at it. It all stinks to high heaven. HUSSEIN’s whole “career” has been riding on a total FRAUD!!!

[danamco]

And Obama has spent over a million dollars suppressing and manipulating it, which is NEWS in itself. Why not produce the document instead of locking down otherwise publicly available data, and spend a million bucks or more doing it?

It opens a whole new cans of worms, including the Indonesian connection as Barry Soetoro

[danamco]

The Hawaii DoH at the request of the Republican governor has verified Obama's Hawaian birth

That statement "could" truthful, he's born there!

But we are not told under what name!!

That may open a whole new can of worms, showing his lifetime "career" is build on a total FRAUD!!!

[danamco]

A legislative effort is necessary. If you live in California, please contact your State Representatives. If California had this as their requirement, it would be impossible for anyone serious about running for President to ever again put us in this position. (70 electoral votes)

We don’t have to change the whole country, just a few states, and California is one of them.

I e-mailed our Secretary of State, CC to Governor Charlie Crist!

I got a computer created standard, "we have received your mail, due to the many e-mail you will hear from us later, bla, bla!!

Our founding farther could never vision (like who could visioned full loaded airplanes used as missiles into WTC,etc.) that a shyster and his party would try to circumvent the Constitution!!!

[danamco]

Thanks for the video.

Did you tried it, it worked last night up until midnight, but not anymore, Somebody is blocking it!!!

[The Californian]

I actually take the time to call and talk to a person. If you have been following the story, you can discuss it sensibly and without it being partisan.

I usually say “Both Senators Obama and McCain were faced with this issue, Senator McCain released all of his documents and Senator Obama concealed his, and we are apparently unable, as a state, to require him to verify. If he had to verify BEFORE his name was on the ballot, this uncertainty would never happen again.”

I then usually follow up with an e-mail to the person I spoke with.

When they find out it is not just about Senator Obama, but about a loophole big enough to drive a Mac Truck through, then it is easier to discuss.

It is then about the system, which needs amendment, not about the current situation.

Thanks for everyone’s help.

If anyone in Texas could get the ball rolling, imagine what that would do - California, Texas and Florida. This would close that loophole nicely.

[The Californian]

Also, the Governor and Secretary of State are the wrong ones to contact. Who you want to contact is your State Senators (not Federal) and your State Representatives, either Democrat or Republican.

There can be no good reason why legislation cannot be enacted in a bi-partisan way requiring all candidates to prove that they can meet the requirements before being put onto the ballots.

The Secretary of State would be the person responsible for oversight, but has nothing to do with legislative efforts.