Posted on 11/01/2008 7:31:55 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde
In Tokyo last week, over a thousand people signed a new petition asking the Japanese government to permit marriages between human beings and cartoon characters. I am no longer interested in three dimensions. I would even like to become a resident of the two-dimensional world, explained Taichi Takashita. Therefore, at the very least, would it be possible to legally authorize marriage with a two-dimensional character?
Get back to me on that Tuesday night. Well know by then whether an entire constitutional republic has decided to contract marriage with a two-dimensional character and to attempt to take up residence in the two-dimensional world. For many of his supporters, Barack Obama is an idea. He offers hope, not fear. Hope of what? Hope of change. Okay, but change to what? Ah, well, there you go again, getting all hung up on three-dimensional reality, when weve moved way beyond that. I dont know which cartoon character Taichi Takashita is eyeing as his betrothed, but up in the sky Obamaman is flying high, fighting for Hope, Change, and a kind of Post-Modern American Way.
The two-dimensional idea of President Obama is seductive: To elect a young black man of Kenyan extraction and Indonesian upbringing offers redemption both for Americas original sin (slavery) and for the more recent perceived sins of President Bush his supposed enthusiasm for sticking it to foreigners generally, and the Muslim world in particular. And no, Im not saying hes Muslim. Its worse than that: Hes a pasty-faced European at least in his view of state power, welfare, and taxation.
But, in a sense, hes not anything in particular, so much as everything in general. The media dispatched legions of reporters to hoot and jeer at Sarah Palins Wasilla without ever wondering: Where would we go to do this to Obama? Wheres his home town? Bill Clinton was famously (if not entirely accurately) from a place called Hope. Barack Obama is from an idea called hope. Whats the area code? 1-800-HOPE4CHANGE. The 1-800 candidate offers the hope of electing a younger Morgan Freeman, the cool, reserved, dignified black man who, when hes not literally God walking among us (as in Bruce Almighty), is always the conscience of the movie.
You can understand the appeal of such an idea. Even if youre not hung up on white liberal guilt or Bush loathing, theres an urge to get it over with, to say, well, America should have a black president, and the sooner the better ie, the sooner we do it, the better it speaks of us. They have a point. I look at the roll call of the dead on 9/11: Arestegui, Bolourchi, Carstanjen, Droz, Elseth, Foti, Gronlund, Hannafin, Iskyan, Kuge, Laychak, Mojica, Nguyen, Ong, Pappalardo, Quigley, Retic, Shuyin, Tarrou, Vamsikrishna, Warchola, Yuguang, Zarba. Black, white, Scandinavian, Balkan, Arab, Asian in a word, American. The presidential pantheon has a narrower ring: Clinton, Reagan, Nixon, Johnson. Obama has a tedious shtick about how his name sounds odd and he doesnt look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills. Hes not just picking out the drapes for the Oval Office, hes ordering up the new currency and booking the sculptors for Mount Rushmore.
And why not? Obama in the White House, Obama on the dollar bill, Obama on Rushmore would symbolize the possibilities of America more than that narrow list of white-bread protestant presidents to date.
The problem is were not electing a symbol, a logo, a two-dimensional image. Long before he emerged on the national stage as Barack the Hope-Giver and Bringer of Change, there was a three-dimensional Barack Obama, a real man who lives in the real world. And thats where the problem lies.
The Senator and his doting Obots in the media have gone to great lengths to obscure what Barack Obama does when hes not being a symbol: his voting record, his friends, his patrons, his life outside the soft-focus memoirs is deemed non-relevant to the general hopey-changey vibe. But occasionally we get a glimpse. The offhand aside to Joe the Plumber about spreading the wealth around was revealing because it suggests a crude redistributive view of social justice. Yet the nimble Hope-a-Dope sidestepper brushed it aside, telling a crowd in Raleigh that next John McCain will be accusing me of being a secret communist because I shared my toys in kindergarten.
But that too is revealing. As John Hood pointed out at National Review, communism is not sharing. In a free society, the citizen chooses whether to share his Lego, trade it for some Thomas the Tank Engine train tracks, or keep it to himself. From that freedom of action grow mighty Playmobile cities. Communism is compulsion. Its the government confiscating your Elmo to share it with someone of its choice. Joe the Plumber is free to spread his own wealth around hiring employees, buying supplies from local businesses, enjoying surfnturf night at his favorite eatery. But, in Obamas world view, thats not good enough: the state is the best judge of how to spread Joe the Plumbers wealth around.
The Senator is a wealthy man, mainly on the strength of two bestselling books offering his biography in lieu of policy and accomplishments. Many lively members of his Kenyan family occur as supporting characters in his story and provide the vivid color in it. But they too are not merely two-dimensional cartoons. His Aunt Zeituni, a memorable figure in Obamas writing, turned up for real last week, when the dogged James Bone of the London Times tracked her down. She lives in a rundown housing project in Boston.
In his Wednesday-night infomercial, Obama declared that his fundamental belief was that I am my brothers keeper. Back in Kenya, his brother lives in a shack on 12 bucks a year. If Barack is his brothers keeper, why couldnt he send him a ten-dollar bill and near double the guys income? The reality is that Barack Obama assumes the government should be his brothers keeper, and his aunts keeper. Why be surprised by that? For 20 years in Illinois, Obama has marinated in the swamps of the Chicago political machine and the campus radicalism of William Ayers and Rashid Khalidi. In such a world, the redistributive urge is more or less a minimum entry qualification.
The government as wealth-spreader-in-chief was not a slip of the tongue but consistent with Obamas life, friends and votes. The Obamacons thats to say, conservatives hot for Barack- - justify their decision to support a big-spending big-government Democrat with the most liberal voting record in the Senate by hoping that he doesnt mean it, by hoping that hell change in office. I sure hope Obama is more open, centrist, sensible, declared reformed conservative Ken Adelman, than his liberal record indicates.
Hes hoping that Obama will buck not just Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and the rest of the gang but also his voting record, his personal address book, and his entire adult life. Good luck betting the future on that. The change well get isnt hard to discern: An expansion of government, an increase in taxes, a greater annexation of the dynamic part of the economy by the sclerotic bureaucracy, a reduction in economic liberty . . . oh, and a lot more Chicago machine politics.
On Tuesday many Americans will vote for the two-dimensional Obama the image, the idea, the hope. But it will be the three-dimensional Obama the real man with the real record that America will have to live with.
The meaning of spread the wealth is lost on people from the left. Last night, granted it was a joke, my roommate was saying giving out candy was spreading the wealth. I said, maybe, but no one is forcing us to give it out.
Saturday morning Steyn ping.
Where will the price of oil be after Obama rapes the oil industry with tax increases? Exxon paid 49% of its first-quarter gross income, in income taxes. HALF!
You are not going to get a Lib Discount Card from Obama!
I don’t think that’s going to work. I mean, there’s going to be several thousand people married to Lum.
... Obama in the White House, Obama on the dollar bill, Obama on Rushmore would symbolize the possibilities of America more than that narrow list of white-bread protestant presidents to date.
The problem is were not electing a symbol, a logo, a two-dimensional image. Long before he emerged on the national stage as Barack the Hope-Giver and Bringer of Change, there was a three-dimensional Barack Obama, a real man who lives in the real world. And thats where the problem lies.
The Senator and his doting Obots in the media have gone to great lengths to obscure what Barack Obama does when hes not being a symbol: his voting record, his friends, his patrons, his life outside the soft-focus memoirs is deemed non-relevant to the general hopey-changey vibe. But occasionally we get a glimpse. The offhand aside to Joe the Plumber about spreading the wealth around was revealing because it suggests a crude redistributive view of social justice. Yet the nimble Hope-a-Dope sidestepper brushed it aside, telling a crowd in Raleigh that next John McCain will be accusing me of being a secret communist because I shared my toys in kindergarten.
But that too is revealing. As John Hood pointed out at National Review, communism is not sharing. In a free society, the citizen chooses whether to share his Lego, trade it for some Thomas the Tank Engine train tracks, or keep it to himself. From that freedom of action grow mighty Playmobile cities. Communism is compulsion. Its the government confiscating your Elmo to share it with someone of its choice. Joe the Plumber is free to spread his own wealth around hiring employees, buying supplies from local businesses, enjoying surfnturf night at his favorite eatery. But, in Obamas world view, thats not good enough: the state is the best judge of how to spread Joe the Plumbers wealth around.
Nailed It!
Moral Clarity BUMP !
This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for the perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author all 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of the good stuff that is worthy of attention. You can see the list of articles I pinged to lately on my page.
You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about). Besides this one, I keep 2 separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson and Orson Scott Card.
Thanks for the ping.
Thanks, bfl
Even as I sit here terrified about this election and where our country will go if B Hussein Obama is elected, I can't help but laugh at Mark Steyn's magnificent turn of phrase.
I was rolling at this one, “And no, Im not saying hes Muslim. Its worse than that: Hes a pasty-faced European at least in his view of state power, welfare, and taxation.” I wonder how long it takes for him to come up with this stuff.
Ping!
I want to be married to Howl, from Howl’s Moving Castle.
He is darling, a wizard and sounds like Christian Bale.
I wonder if one can marry an English dub of the character?
My eight-year-old will want to marry Cyndaquil the Pokemon.
Thanks for pinging me.
The correct analogy would be that when a kid shows up with a lot of candy, the home owner takes it from him and gives it to the kids who were too lazy to go out trick or treating.
I have learned an important lesson, be sure to include Mark Steyn in the article title for his pieces. People are much more responsive to that.
Good call actually.
When I search, I always put “Steyn” in the search to cut to the chase.
Cheers,
knewshound
Absolutely. I just love Mark Steyn. Thanks for posting, Mr. Blonde. Thanks for the ping, knewshound.
One of my favorite lines:
If Barack is his brothers keeper, why couldnt he send him a ten-dollar bill and near double the guys income?
Sorry if this posts twice.
Even the most average Steyn article is bound to have two or three pretty good zingers in it.
CLASSIC Mark Steyn!Pinging a few folks to this one!
Here's an Excerpt:
- - - - - - - -
The Senator and his doting Obots in the media have gone to great lengths to obscure what Barack Obama does when hes not being a symbol: his voting record, his friends, his patrons, his life outside the soft-focus memoirs is deemed non-relevant to the general hopey-changey vibe. But occasionally we get a glimpse. The offhand aside to Joe the Plumber about spreading the wealth around was revealing because it suggests a crude redistributive view of social justice. Yet the nimble Hope-a-Dope sidestepper brushed it aside, telling a crowd in Raleigh that next John McCain will be accusing me of being a secret communist because I shared my toys in kindergarten.
But that too is revealing. As John Hood pointed out at National Review, communism is not sharing. In a free society, the citizen chooses whether to share his Lego, trade it for some Thomas the Tank Engine train tracks, or keep it to himself. From that freedom of action grow mighty Playmobile cities. Communism is compulsion. Its the government confiscating your Elmo to share it with someone of its choice. Joe the Plumber is free to spread his own wealth around hiring employees, buying supplies from local businesses, enjoying surfnturf night at his favorite eatery. But, in Obamas world view, thats not good enough: the state is the best judge of how to spread Joe the Plumbers wealth around.
- - - - - - - -
Ping! Ping! Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.