Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Skinny models in ads don't sell
The Times of India ^ | 19 Nov., 2008 | ANI

Posted on 11/19/2008 5:53:45 PM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins

LONDON: The golden rule of advertising - thin models lure more people towards the product - is actually a misconception, claims a new research. The study revealed that skinny models are a ‘turn off’ to consumers in TV commercials and other advertising.

According to scientists, images of super-thin models carry no edge in encouraging young women to buy and for the majority of adult women ads showing skinny girls actually discouraged sales whereas plus size models encouraged them to buy, the study found.

To reach the conclusion, the study psychologist Phillippa Diedrichs, of the University of Queensland, Australia, created a series of ads for underwear, shampoo and a party dress.

Each ad was made twice, once using a skinny size eight model and another featuring a size 12 woman. When the ads were shown to 400 young women, they produced no difference in the likelihood for them to buy.

However, when women aged between 18 and 25 saw the adverts they felt better - and more likely to buy - after viewing the images of the larger models.

"For anything to change, research has to be convincing, not just to government and health researchers, but also to people in advertising who actually make the decisions," the Telegraph quoted Diedrichs, as saying.

"Often people make the argument that thinness sells, and that’’s why they use slim models.

"But we can change the images we see and still sell products but also make people feel better about themselves," the expert added.

There have been concerted campaigns against the ultra-thin "size zero" with fashion weeks in Madrid and Milan banning models from the catwalk who were of a weight deemed unhealthy by the Body Mass Index measure.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: advertisement; appeal; magazines; models
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Lizavetta

She’s about 30-40 pounds shy of what one might consider “hot”. Or at least nice looking.


21 posted on 11/19/2008 6:13:52 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins; Lil'freeper

‘Bout time someone figured out what the rest of us already knew.


22 posted on 11/19/2008 6:15:03 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Because ads put the viewer into a fantasy world and encourages them to buy what they want to be. Yes, most of the time it is silly but sometimes it is ok. This article is crazy to me. Of course skinny models sell.
23 posted on 11/19/2008 6:15:39 PM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

now that’s not any 14 y.o. boy!!! Yum.....


24 posted on 11/19/2008 6:16:20 PM PST by Enchante (Thanks, Mediascum, you "elected" your candidate and now the country will pay....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I like a woman with a nice booty.

Exhibit A:


25 posted on 11/19/2008 6:22:36 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

Too bad she has a bubble head and voted for Obummer.


26 posted on 11/19/2008 6:24:46 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013 Obama's last day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

We have not watched tv in over 20 years broadcast or cable. I wont let that trash in our house.


27 posted on 11/19/2008 6:27:02 PM PST by Chickensoup (we owe HUSSEIN & Democrats the exact kind respect & loyalty that they showed us, Bush & Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A knight without armor

That makes me wonder, what were the years of the supermodels’ heyday? Cindy Crawford, and the “trinity” of Evangelista, Turlington, and Campell, oh, and Claudia Schiffer. Those women were Amazonian, and they were the only true “supermodels”, I wondered if there some correlation between which party was in power, and their reign. I don’t remember what “their” years were though.


28 posted on 11/19/2008 6:29:06 PM PST by mrsmel (That one is not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Lean with curves is great!

The reason thin doesn't sell is most Americans, male and female are grossly overweight and have been for a couple of decades.

Trim and in shape isn't in....

29 posted on 11/19/2008 6:29:13 PM PST by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

I’m not a guy, but as woman, I wouldn’t want that rear. I call it a “shelf” rear, and it looks destroys the line of clothes, IMO. I liked the shape of Fifties’ models, shapely but streamlined.


30 posted on 11/19/2008 6:31:37 PM PST by mrsmel (That one is not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde
I like my booty shaken, not stirred!


31 posted on 11/19/2008 6:33:28 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Too bad more women are like Oklahoma girls, beautiful and have their heads on right politically.


32 posted on 11/19/2008 6:33:44 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
This is a very nice model:


33 posted on 11/19/2008 6:34:08 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
She’s not skinny. She’s lean with curves

Oh yeah right. Like fat women are just "big-boned," right. Olive Oyl has more meat than that broad in the picture.

34 posted on 11/19/2008 6:35:17 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

So who’s got the ideal body, in your extreme opinion?


35 posted on 11/19/2008 6:37:16 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta; MyTwoCopperCoins

36 posted on 11/19/2008 6:40:51 PM PST by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

I think these photos exaggerate it a little bit. But point taken.


37 posted on 11/19/2008 6:41:48 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Nice! Well, actually revolting. But funny.


38 posted on 11/19/2008 6:43:46 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
So who’s got the ideal body, in your extreme opinion?

That's easy....Salma Hayek.


39 posted on 11/19/2008 6:44:07 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Oh what the heck....

40 posted on 11/19/2008 6:46:50 PM PST by AndrewB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson