Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I won': GOP words to live by
Politico ^ | 1/29/09 4:41 AM EST | HUGH HEWITT

Posted on 01/29/2009 7:20:43 AM PST by pillut48

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Twinkie

Look at a chart of the S&P 500.

June 2008 - Obama gets the nomination and we start down.
October 2008 - when McCain’s polls numbers are awful BIG down.
Nov 2-4 2008 - a little rally because McCain closed in the polls.
Nov 6 after the election down more.

The market collapsed because the fear Obama is a marxist. People with any money or businesses have ZERO confidence in Obama.


41 posted on 01/29/2009 8:12:08 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Yep, the insane ones, who post here and claim to be conservatives, but want to lose elections to the rats to teach us a lesson have a lot to be happy about as our nation teters on the edge of the abyss. The downfall started with the first “lesson” giving control of congress to Pelosi Galore and Reid the Red in the 2006 election.

There was a large measure of that, yes.

But examining the history of these things over the last many years on Free Republic, I'm beginning to believe that an Obama or his like was inevitable.

The combination of the illegal donations flowing in the back door to the Obama campaign, and the BILLIONS of dollars in free advertising from the Obama-worshipping media was unstoppable. I know that you're a media watcher also, and I know that I've NEVER seen anything like what went down in the last two months of the election.

On the bright? side, I also think that the September meltdown "got some help", and the "helpers" didn't really understand the full consequences of what they were doing.

The only way we're going to be able to take back the Republic is by denying the liberal Fascists any sort of aid and comfort in their attempts to get the "easy-money consumer economy" back on track.

They thought they could have this little hiccup, scare everybody, and then go back to the good ol' housing bubble, the good ol' credit card bubble, and all the other bubbles.

Us old-fashioned idiots knew all along that they were spending beyond their means, and wondered what wrong with OURSELVES that we couldn't get with the easy-money program.

Well, right now, this is the ONLY time they're going to be vulnerable. If they get their program back on track, you might as well sign your property, paycheck, children and grandchildren over to them. So, it's time to fight.

42 posted on 01/29/2009 8:12:25 AM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: Commander in The Effort Against Culturally-Influenced Misbehavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
As far as I am concerned...he's right. He won. That's true. He won because we 1) ran a disaster of a candidate; 2) Mucked up the whole works by abandoning our principles as a party via Bush and his compassionate big government and 3) have allowed the dems and their media accomplices to paint us as people we are not.

He won...let them (the dems) run this country into the ground ALONE and BY THEMSELVES and we will be the voice of opposition. What will happen is they will be like Carter all over again. What goes around comes around. Hopefully in four years...we can sweep the whole bunch out and then govern from our principles and NOT ABANDON THEM under scrutiny or fear of being called names.

THEN...hopefully...someone with some stones...will stand up as POTUS and say to the minority leader Nancy P...Hey Nancy...remember what you and BHO said 4 years ago? Well guess what...I won...sit down and shut up.

I doubt it seriously though...'cause we are the stupid party and we...for some reason...remind me of the picked on little kid who wants to be friends with the class bully.

43 posted on 01/29/2009 8:13:58 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
Extra money= ammo and survival food. Nothing else for the socialist economy in this house.

Exactly.

44 posted on 01/29/2009 8:14:11 AM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: Commander in The Effort Against Culturally-Influenced Misbehavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UpInArms

It’ll be interesting to see if the media totally ignores his falling approval ratings. And when people continue to be laid off in the coming months and prices/taxes continue to go up, it will. There is no Hopenchange, America, and 52% of you proved once again that the snake oil salesman is alive and well.

My guess is Obamaphoria will have worn off by June among 60% of the twits that voted for him, when they can no longer ignore the fact that the Emperor has no clothes.


45 posted on 01/29/2009 8:15:35 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Yep, the insane ones, who post here and claim to be conservatives, but want to lose elections to the rats to teach us a lesson have a lot to be happy about as our nation teters (sic) on the edge of the abyss."
"The grim reality is simple. When you lose elections, you have no power and become “Irrelevant!“

I think you actually do a good job highlighting the essential difference between conservatives on one hand and many contemporary republicans, including RINO's, Compassionate Conservatives, NeoCons, and the reach-across-the-asile kind of pretend republicans on the other hand.

Conservatives generally place principle over winning at any cost, whereas many of today's republicans place winning at any cost before principle.

If your goal is to implement policies consistent with conservative principles nothing is gained if you have to run a liberal as a republican to win.
Yes, we all know the argument that you must be in the game, you must win no matter the cost, or you cannot hope to see your principles transformed into policy.

Te sad truth is that when you win with a liberal gussied up as a RINO or other non-conservative they ignore conservatives until they need their votes again. We just had an eight year lesson in that as we watched a republican president reach across the island to Ted Kennedy more than he did to conservatives.

All conservatives are not at heart rabid republican party loyalists, but most do generally vote republican as the lesser of two evils. But, if there is a viable, more conservative alternative candidate that is where the conservative vote would go.
But republican party loyalists vote for the party's candidates - even the really horrible ones, because they want their party in power.

That is a significant difference and explains why republican party loyalists get so upset with conservatives who do not always blindly support republicans.

Look at the last election - the party faithful would have voted for McCain no matter what, but he would probably received 10 million fewer votes if he had not brought Sarah Palin on board to attract conservatives disgusted with the republican party.

46 posted on 01/29/2009 8:23:13 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

47 posted on 01/29/2009 8:29:22 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
At least he is honest enough to wear a black hat.
48 posted on 01/29/2009 8:31:43 AM PST by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

“Look at the last election - the party faithful would have voted for McCain no matter what, but he would probably received 10 million fewer votes if he had not brought Sarah Palin on board to attract conservatives disgusted with the republican party”

EXACTLY!

Count me as one of those who only came on for McCain after he picked Palin. Otherwise I was voting for Bob Barr and the libertarians.

If we want a candidate like a Fred Thompson, or a Duncan Hunter conservative, we have to start getting the money together now for that inevitable battle over who the GOP National committee selects, and who the people want.

And we need to get movements going to change the primary rules in the early states requiring party registration. We have to eliminate the cross over pollution that obviously targets the real conservatives.

We don’t have to work for the GOP National committee, nor send them money. But we sure can send them a lot of free advice.


49 posted on 01/29/2009 8:33:17 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
I understand your point, but while I assume that some of the more moderate Republicans have been taught a lesson, our nation is going to have Obama in the Oval Office for at least 4 years. As we saw with the Georgia Peanut, a lot of damage can be done in four years.

McCain was my absolute last choice as a nominee. But I donated to his campaign and dragged myself to the polls to vote for him. Why? Because I could see what this Marzist charlatan would do. MY principles tell me to protect the country first of all, and I do not see that having a President Obama is going to do that.

50 posted on 01/29/2009 8:36:38 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

Hate to break the news to you but the FBI was well aware of the fraud taking hold in the mortgage and other financial industries but had no resources or real support to do much about it. Why? Something called 9-11 happened and the focus was turned to preventing terrorism instead of domestic crime. A few high profile convictions for fraud years ago might have saved us a lot of headaches.


51 posted on 01/29/2009 8:38:34 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

If Bush had said to the Dems, “I won” when they went to him for more spending or other liberal BS I would say, damn right he did. The minority party that lost its ability to play due to its record and its blessing by the voters simply has to know their place. I think the Dems acted like bitches for the time that the Repubs ruled the roost but conduct aside, elections have consequences and one of them is that the other party calls the shots when you lose.


52 posted on 01/29/2009 8:44:08 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal
It’ll be interesting to see if the media totally ignores his falling approval ratings.

Ah yes, the media. Perhaps the loss of rabbit-ear TV will hurt the lame-stream. There is an estimated 4 million sets that will go to static. The print media is taking a thrashing except for the right leaning press. Ratings of cable news favors FOX that presents both sides. Remarks by the nazis that talk radio is a blight and pornographic, only brings more attention to it and attracts more listeners. The Internet with its good and bad at least allows information to flow and flow rapidly. We were screwed by the credit card election fraud of millions of small donors that gave to the zero man campaign (micro-Soros), but Free Republic is here and others. Internet broadcasts of Rush and others cannot be blocked by today's laws and technology. At least in my circles, more and more people are voicing their opinions, where there has been only silence, that the government is the problem and will never be the solution.

The "media" resources and influence are waining and their paint brushes can only whitewash just so much at a time. This will be especially true when people really start hurting due to the socialist programs that are being thrust upon us. How long will "yes we can" play?

53 posted on 01/29/2009 8:47:04 AM PST by UpInArms (no failure, no success, only slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal
Seeing this info on the MSM?? Not likely!!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
54 posted on 01/29/2009 8:47:58 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I understand your point, but while I assume that some of the more moderate Republicans have been taught a lesson, our nation is going to have Obama in the Oval Office for at least 4 years. As we saw with the Georgia Peanut, a lot of damage can be done in four years.

And the fact that I am here to reply shows that, no matter how bad it is, we survive. I'd rather have four years of an Obama who I know is against everything I stand for than the same from a McCain who only pretends to be for what I stand for until he gets my vote, then turns into an Obama anyway. I've put up with 12 years of betrayal by the people who were supposed to be on my side, at least now I get to have the guy with the knife look me in the eye as he sticks it in.

55 posted on 01/29/2009 8:48:16 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Housing markets started declining in late 2005 then went into crash mode in 2006. Financial houses started having problems in 2007. Stock marker peaked in November of 2007 and lost 40% of more of their value BEFORE Obama won the election. Oh, we had that commodity bubble that developed in 2008 as a result of Bernanke’s bubble blowing activities as well.

Sorry but this mess started on Bush’s watch. His failures led to the election of Obama who now wants to screw us over even more.


56 posted on 01/29/2009 8:49:49 AM PST by misterrob (Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
Other words to live by:

"Vae victis."

If you don't know what it means, look it up.
57 posted on 01/29/2009 8:52:40 AM PST by Antoninus (America didn't turn away from conservatism, they turned away from many who faked it. - Mark Sanford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

“Until the Republicans voted in unison against the faux stimulus package, I would agree completely.”

That was a terrible blow to our country and us.

Now we have Zer0, a rat controlled congress, Supremes, who are more afraid of riots than enforcing the constitution, and the MSM that will support Zer0, Nancy and Harry even if they destroy our country.


58 posted on 01/29/2009 9:38:44 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Democrat Dean

“Remember Monty Python’s knight whose arms, etc, were cut off? How can the Republicans fight when the Democraps don’t need their votes at all?”

We have lost elections until we are irrelevant.

Wait until Zer0 floods us with Executive Orders that can’t be challenged because of our numbers in Congress and with a Supreme Court more interested in preventing riots instead of insuring that our constitution is not destroyed.


59 posted on 01/29/2009 9:42:52 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Good thoughts! Keep us posted as to how to win this battle for our country when we don’t control Congress, the Outhouse and the MSM.


60 posted on 01/29/2009 9:48:51 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals or foriegn or domestic terrorists or both?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson