Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Draft of the Neandertal Genome Sequence Released
ICR ^ | March 4, 2009 | Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.

Posted on 03/04/2009 7:00:22 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

First Draft of the Neandertal Genome Sequence Released

by Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.*

The highly anticipated initial draft assembly of the Neandertal genome was announced at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in the United States and at a European press conference.1 This genomic milestone involves approximately 3 billion bases of ancient human (Neandertal) DNA sequenced so far, which is the same amount of DNA contained in one set of human chromosomes or a single genome coverage. This is a major event in the booming scientific field referred to as “paleogenomics,” a discipline that studies ancient DNA and is providing exciting new evidence in support of the recent creation model.

The Neandertal DNA was obtained from bone fragments using advanced isolation techniques developed specifically to remove contamination and alleviate DNA damage associated with ancient DNA. In addition, “next generation” sequencing technology involving new chemistry and instrumentation was used to rapidly produce considerably more DNA sequence data per laboratory run than previous technologies.

The effort to produce an initial 3 billion bases of DNA for the Neandertal genome was led by Dr. Svaante Paabo of the Institute for Anthropology at the Max Planck Research Institute in Germany. It should be noted that future Neandertal sequencing promises to increase the accuracy of the overall DNA sequence, as well as fill in gaps found in the current “rough draft” sequence. All of the DNA sequence will be placed in the public domain (web-based databases) for researchers around the world to freely query, download, and analyze. In fact, researchers at ICR will be using the Neandertal DNA sequence in a variety of research projects investigating the role of the human genome in the creation model.

Evolutionists consider modern humans and Neandertals to be two distinct human species that separated from each other 35,000 to 800,000 years ago. However, within the recent creation perspective, Neandertals and modern humans are not really separate “species,” but represent different human gene pools in time and location.

Consistent with this idea, the genomes are proving to be quite similar. In fact, preliminary findings over the past couple of years support this interpretation, as a variety of genes have been characterized in the Neandertal genome with high similarity to modern human genes. These genes are associated with such traits as pale skin and red hair, type O blood, and high levels of linguistic and mental ability.2, 3, 4 Since evolutionary scientists considered these gene variants to be strictly associated with modern humans, it comes as no surprise that the evidence will once again force “re-explanations.”

The Neandertals essentially represented a unique ethnic group that is now gone due to the same factors that affect modern human populations—factors such as migration, mutation, and interbreeding. Neandertals represent a variant genome from within the created human kind. We predict that future analysis of Neandertal DNA sequence data will add confirmation to creation, but consternation to other origins models.

References

  1. Pennisi, E. 2009. Neandertal Genomics: Tales of a Prehistoric Human Genome. Science. 323 (5916): 866-871.
  2. Culotta, E. 2007. Ancient DNA Reveals Neandertals With Red Hair, Fair Complexions. Science. 318 (5850): 546-547.
  3. Lalueza-Fox, C. et al. 2008. Genetic characterization of the ABO blood group in Neandertals. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 8: 342.
  4. Krause, J. et al. 2007. The Derived FOXP2 Variant of Modern Humans Was Shared with Neandertals. Current Biology. 17 (21): 1908-1912.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aaas; basepairs; belongsinreligion; creation; dna; drsvaantepaabo; evolution; genome; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; maxplanck; neandertal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2009 7:00:22 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Finny; vladimir998; Coyoteman; allmendream; LeGrande; GunRunner; cacoethes_resipisco; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 03/04/2009 7:00:59 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

So when are we going to be able to simulate DNA on a computer. Or in other words, input DNA data into a computer and have it simulate the organism defined by that DNA?


3 posted on 03/04/2009 7:10:40 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

How is Helen doing after the biopsy?


4 posted on 03/04/2009 7:11:26 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 42 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Fascinating question. I don’t think anything realistic will emerge for a long time to come, as we are only just beginning to scratch the surface of the mind-boggling complexity that is life.


5 posted on 03/04/2009 7:12:31 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
We predict that future analysis of Neandertal DNA sequence data will add confirmation to creation, but consternation to other origins models.

I predict that no matter what the future analysis is, it will be interpreted by ICR to add confirmation to creation.

6 posted on 03/04/2009 7:13:25 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Part way there now. Crime scene DNA can provide a forensic anthropologist the approximate facial characteristics, skin tone and eye and hair color.

Long ways to go to do a whole unknown organism, but that day is visible on the horizon.


7 posted on 03/04/2009 7:17:05 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 42 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
"Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D." Ph.D. Doctor of . . . ?
8 posted on 03/04/2009 7:17:14 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
These genes are associated with such traits as pale skin and red hair, type O blood, and high levels of linguistic and mental ability.

Well four out of five aint bad. I'm type A+.

Go ahead, call me a Neandertal.

9 posted on 03/04/2009 7:21:02 PM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic; GodGunsGuts
"I predict that no matter what the future analysis is, it will be interpreted by ICR to add confirmation to creation. "

I predict that no matter what the future analysis is, Darwinians will condemn it as crap, because it came from a politically incorrect source.

10 posted on 03/04/2009 7:21:03 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

Dr. Jeff Tomkins joins ICR as Research Associate in life sciences. Dr. Tomkins is a geneticist, recently on staff at Clemson University, where he managed a large gene sequencing laboratory. He will assist ICR in genetics research at its Dallas laboratories.

http://www.icr.org/article/4309/


11 posted on 03/04/2009 7:23:20 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Evolutionists consider modern humans and Neandertals to be two distinct human species that separated from each other 35,000 to 800,000 years ago. However, within the recent creation perspective, Neandertals and modern humans are not really separate “species,” but represent different human gene pools in time and location.

Just like wolves and coyotes really represent different canine gene pools? Or are wolves and coyotes separate species? My dog has pale skin and red hair too, but he isn't human.

12 posted on 03/04/2009 7:24:01 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Who knows, your recent coming out might land you a movie deal!


13 posted on 03/04/2009 7:27:48 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

According to the creation perspective, wolves and coyotes descended from the same created kind.


14 posted on 03/04/2009 7:29:43 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

PS I believe they are specifically referring to the specifically human genes for pale skin and red hair.


15 posted on 03/04/2009 7:32:14 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS; tacticalogic

No matter, the fact remains that neandertal just got even more human—just as the creationists have been predicting all along.


16 posted on 03/04/2009 7:35:03 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
According to the creation perspective, wolves and coyotes descended from the same created kind.

Yes, but they are now separate species, just modern humans and Neanderthals.

17 posted on 03/04/2009 7:35:37 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; Inyo-Mono
According to the creation perspective, wolves and coyotes descended from the same created kind.

IOW, "evolution", but GGG hasn't accepted that yet. Though his "devolution" evolution is hyper-fast, occurring in just under 6,000 years' time!
18 posted on 03/04/2009 7:36:36 PM PST by whattajoke (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono
"Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have."

LOL!

19 posted on 03/04/2009 7:37:59 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
No matter, the fact remains that neandertal just got even more human—just as the creationists have been predicting all along.

So according to your "de-evolution" theory, they "de-evolved" into humans?

20 posted on 03/04/2009 7:38:34 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson