Skip to comments.
White House Softens Language on 2010 Census Plan
Fox News ^
| 3/11/09
| staff
Posted on 03/11/2009 5:16:16 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
03/11/2009 5:16:16 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
It is still an executive power grab.
2
posted on
03/11/2009 5:17:21 PM PDT
by
mylife
( The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Nachum
3
posted on
03/11/2009 5:18:30 PM PDT
by
GOP Poet
To: mylife
ACORN alert!
To: Nachum
I received a call from the census yesterday. I had to answer questions from their “long form”. Nothing terribly invasive, but I did find out that they are now going to do the census every FIVE years.
Strange, but I don’t think it was a scam.
5
posted on
03/11/2009 5:20:31 PM PDT
by
EggsAckley
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
To: mylife; SumProVita; HardStarboard; BradyLS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; dervish; Twotone; ...
I guess it will have to go on the list
The List, ping
6
posted on
03/11/2009 5:21:07 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(the complete record at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
If they can cheat their way into gerrymandering a permanent Democrat majority in the House, we are in deep doo-doo. The Census should be an actual count. Nothing else will satisfy the Constitution. Not that the Dems give a whit about the Constitution.
To: Nachum
White Hut may “soften language.”
White Hut will not “change plan.”
8
posted on
03/11/2009 5:23:37 PM PDT
by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
To: RobinOfKingston
9
posted on
03/11/2009 5:25:36 PM PDT
by
Batman11
("Big ears isn't my President!")
To: Nachum
Communists lie, cheat and deceive.
10
posted on
03/11/2009 5:26:43 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: Nachum
Please forgive my ignorance, but I don’t completely understand the political power significance of a census. Could someone please briefly explain?
11
posted on
03/11/2009 5:27:39 PM PDT
by
3boysdad
To: Nachum
If the Obamoron’s lips are moving . . . . he’s lying.
Actions . . . . . . words!
12
posted on
03/11/2009 5:28:32 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: unkus
13
posted on
03/11/2009 5:29:02 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: 3boysdad
The numbers will determine who gets what money. Always follow the money.
14
posted on
03/11/2009 5:29:04 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(the complete record at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
This is only because the Commerce department is now in the hands of a loyal leftist.....and not Judd Gregg.
To: Nachum
Democrats want a “fair and accurate” count.
How about just an accurate count?
If fairness comes into play we know exactly who will make the rules about what is fairness.
And like anything else named with the “fairness” moniker, it smokescreens actual intent.
16
posted on
03/11/2009 5:31:45 PM PDT
by
o_zarkman44
(Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
To: RobinOfKingston
I’m soooooooo stealing your White Hut...it’s wonderful.
To: Nachum
Yes, I’ve gathered that by now, but I don’t undersand how. I always thought they just went out and “counted” people in the country. What am I missing?
18
posted on
03/11/2009 5:32:03 PM PDT
by
3boysdad
To: 3boysdad
If you can tweak the numbers so your friends/constituents have majorities then those communities get spending.
19
posted on
03/11/2009 5:32:58 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(the complete record at www.nachumlist.com)
To: lilycicero
20
posted on
03/11/2009 5:34:33 PM PDT
by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson