Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Softens Language on 2010 Census Plan
Fox News ^ | 3/11/09 | staff

Posted on 03/11/2009 5:16:16 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Nachum

I am not answering any more questions than I did on the 2000 census. Screw them.


41 posted on 03/11/2009 5:58:09 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Before the 2000 census the XXX-42 administration got a smackdown from the court (in a narrowly defined case) that they couldn't use statistical sampling to apportion the House seats among the states . Clinton and gang quickly pointed out that they hadn't been restricted from using sampling to layout House districts. Even if you have the Dems tied down 99%, that 1% will still cause trouble.
42 posted on 03/11/2009 5:58:43 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Obama: removing the speed limit on the Road to Serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

Just ping me to your wit when you get another new phrase....I like mean humor.


43 posted on 03/11/2009 6:04:19 PM PDT by lilycicero (THANKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

That’s the American Community Survey; they do that so they don’t have to do the long form in the Census.


44 posted on 03/11/2009 6:13:14 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Nope Obama how about we do it the way it’s been done since we started them and you keep your nose and your party politics out of it?


45 posted on 03/11/2009 6:16:47 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Soften their language”?

In other words, they’re still politicizing it....they’re just doing it with a different tone.

We’re hosed folks.


46 posted on 03/11/2009 6:20:19 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

LOL!!!


47 posted on 03/11/2009 6:27:14 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 3boysdad
Please forgive my ignorance, but I don’t completely understand the political power significance of a census. Could someone please briefly explain?

The number of Representatives each state gets in the House is determined by population. The number of Senators is fixed at two per state.

Regards,
GtG

48 posted on 03/11/2009 6:45:21 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 3boysdad
P.S. If the census comes every ten years, what it Bush or Clinton in office for the last one?

Clinton, the 2000 census started in January 2000. the election was in November with Bush entering office some weeks after the normal 10 Jan 2001 due to albore's antics.

Regards,
GtG

49 posted on 03/11/2009 6:50:53 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

Thanks for reading through my typo. Just what I suspected... we’re getting screwed twice in a row. That doesn’t surprise me anymore.

I guess my responce to the census will be... “Ten. Me, myself, I, an AR-15, AR-10, M1 Garand, 1911 .45, .300 mag, 7mm mag, 30-30 Winchester, Mossberg 500 tactical, several sporting shotguns, and many various small CWP pistols. Oh, and do you count munitions stores too? I guess that makes... like, tweleve then. Glad to help. Have a nice day.”


50 posted on 03/11/2009 7:47:30 PM PDT by 3boysdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 3boysdad
Thanks for reading through my typo. Just what I suspected... we’re getting screwed twice in a row. That doesn’t surprise me anymore.

Yeah, I worked the 2000 census for several months. My recollection of that experience is that the dims were calling for "statistical adjustments" because minorities were under reported. No evidence of that ever surfaced but the libtards' mantra was that the mere presence of "official government employees" struck such paralyzing fear into the hearts of minorities that they would hide and not volunteer information.

I would find some truth in that argument if we were talking about illegal squatters but they should not be counted in any event. I don't recall specific policy as to what was done with illegals but I'll go out on a limb here and assume they were counted as citizens in the 2000 enumeration.

You can bet the farm that the illegals will be added in this time around for sure.

Regards,
GtG

51 posted on 03/11/2009 8:30:45 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson