Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Bill Would Allow Tax-Exempt Status for Newspapers
Editor and Publisher ^ | March 24, 2009 1:08 PM ET | Mark Fitzgerald

Posted on 03/24/2009 12:47:27 PM PDT by Red Steel

CHICAGO Newspapers perform a public service for democracy and should be allowed to operate as tax-exempt non-profits, U.S. Sen. Benjamin Cardin, D.-Md., proposed Tuesday.

Cardin introduced a bill that would explicitly include newspapers among organizations eligible for 501(c)(3) status. The non-profit status is the same that public radio and television have now.

The legislation would give a national green light for newspapers to adopt the so-called Low Profit Limited Liability Company business model, often shortened to L3C.

The L3C model, which the Newspaper Guild supports as an alternative newspaper ownership model, is the subject of a feature story in the current print issue of Editor & Publisher.

Under Cardin's legislation, newspaper revenue would be tax-exempt, and contributions to papers would be tax deductible. The status would also allow non-profits to invest in newspapers, something that is forbidden now.

Cardin said action is needed to help preserve local newspapers.

"We are losing our newspaper industry," Cardin said in a statement. "The economy has caused an immediate problem, but the business model for newspapers, based on circulation and advertising revenue, is broken, and that is a real tragedy for communities across the nation and for our democracy."

The Associated Press quoted him as saying on the Senate floor, "As local papers are closing, we're losing a valuable tradition in America -- critically important to our communities, critically important to our democracy."

Newspapers that accept non-profit status would not be allowed to endorse candidates, but they could cover political news just as they do now, Cardin said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2008electionbias; 501c3; 501c3taxcheats; achillwind; agenda; america2point0; bailout; benjamincardin; bigmedia; cardin; collusion; communism; communismkills; congress; corporatewelfare; corruption; cultureofcorruption; democratcongress; democrats; democratscandals; dncmediamachine; dnctalkingpoints; drivebymedia; economy; enemedia; fishwrap; goebbelswouldbeproud; houseorgan; ivorytower; l3c; lamestreammedia; liberalmedia; liberals; lping; maryland; msm; neomarxism; newspapers; nonprofits; obamedia; orwelliannightmare; pelosipapers; presstitutes; puppetmedia; senate; stalinisttactics; statemedia; taxdollarsatwork; taxexempt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: bamahead
Next, they'll be bailing out the the RIAA.

RIAA and BSA's Favorite Lawyers Taking Top Department of Justice Posts (Gizmodo Thu Feb 5 2009 Jesus Diaz)

Obama DOJ Sides With RIAA (slashdot.org March 22, 2009)

41 posted on 03/24/2009 1:05:44 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("I certainly hope he (Bush) doesnÂ’t succeed" - Democratic strategist James Carville 9-11-2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
CHICAGO Newspapers perform a public service for democracy

News papers these days serve as propaganda arms for the socialist/communist. They ought to be illegal rather than rewarded. But, being they're not, we should just let them die off by themselves for the sake of our Republic.

42 posted on 03/24/2009 1:05:50 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
...and contributions to papers would be tax deductible.

43 posted on 03/24/2009 1:05:56 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Newspapers should be taxed at 90 percent.


44 posted on 03/24/2009 1:06:17 PM PDT by FoxInSocks (B. Hussein Obama: Central Planning Czar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The insanity of the left wing lunatics.


45 posted on 03/24/2009 1:06:25 PM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Aww dang, you had to go and turn my sarcasm into reality...didn’t ya??!?!


46 posted on 03/24/2009 1:06:47 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Newspapers that accept non-profit status would not be allowed to endorse candidates, but they could cover political news just as they do now, . .

Yeah, I can see the Austin - Un American Ultra - Liberal Longhorn, Non - Statesman doing that. When hell freezes over.

47 posted on 03/24/2009 1:07:35 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (It took almost 250 years to make the USA great and 30 days for "The Failure" BO to tear it down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

gag


48 posted on 03/24/2009 1:07:41 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

The Democrats own the media. And Hollywood owns the Democrats.


49 posted on 03/24/2009 1:08:39 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("I certainly hope he (Bush) doesnÂ’t succeed" - Democratic strategist James Carville 9-11-2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If nonprofits are supposed to be politically neutral and not lobby does this mean the NYT would change there reporting?


50 posted on 03/24/2009 1:08:59 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Here comes the bailout of the socialist propaganda mills.


51 posted on 03/24/2009 1:11:55 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
If nonprofits are supposed to be politically neutral and not lobby does this mean the NYT would change there reporting?

Wouldn't the correct phrase be "that there reporting?"

52 posted on 03/24/2009 1:13:08 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
Oh, what a tangled web we weave . . .d
53 posted on 03/24/2009 1:13:51 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I am not opposed to this but I find it funny that suddenly it is a good idea to cut taxes...I wonder why this does not seem to be a good idea with everything...If Newspapers can recover due to a tax savings...wouldn’t everything???? I don’t get it.


54 posted on 03/24/2009 1:14:01 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
Tax exempt status plus the mentioned tax deductable donation situation would essentially make them 'Rat political donation tools. You wouldn't have to donate directly to any given 'Rat for their election and the donation wouldn't fall under reporting requirements but the 'Rat candidate local the the donation receiver would receive a lot of "favorable political reporting".

'Course, I might be swayed if the legislation included the same status for 2nd Amendment rights organizations...

55 posted on 03/24/2009 1:14:10 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This is political humor, right?

If it isn’t, it should be.


56 posted on 03/24/2009 1:14:50 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

501(c)(3) organizations are specifically banned from political activity. Of course, supporting the left is not “political.” /s/


57 posted on 03/24/2009 1:17:15 PM PDT by henkster (0bamanomics: "I'll loan you all the money you need to get out of debt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I’m losing my shorts personally, perhaps I should incorporate and apply under a BVDw34jockey enactment for relief.


58 posted on 03/24/2009 1:17:43 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

We know how balanced public radio and TV are. Of course the MSN is already liberal so I guess not much is lost. However I do not like the precedent.


59 posted on 03/24/2009 1:17:53 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Maybe they can recommend bringing back the “Edsel”. They had a business model also !! How about 8 track tapes ??


60 posted on 03/24/2009 1:18:23 PM PDT by bestrongbpositive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson