Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill
www.tiahrt.house.gov ^ | 3/27/09 | Todd Tiahrt

Posted on 03/27/2009 1:07:32 PM PDT by ME-262

WASHINGTON—U.S. Congressman Todd Tiahrt (R-Goddard) today co-sponsored the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill (H.R. 197). This legislation would protect the rights of licensed firearm permit holders by allowing them to carry firearms across the country without a confusing patchwork system.

"The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill recognizes that those who have a valid state-issued concealed firearms permit should not have to forfeit their safety when traveling," said Tiahrt. "Not only does this bill protect the rights of concealed firearm permit holders, it also maintains the right of states to issue concealed weapons permits as they desire. As a mobile society, legal firearm permit carriers should be able to travel from state to state and exercise their fundamental right to self defense—this legislation ensures that."

Specifically, the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill would allow any person with a valid concealed firearm carrying permit or license, issued by a state, to carry a concealed firearm in any state, as follows:

* In states that issue concealed firearm permits, a state’s laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would apply within its borders. * In states that do not issue carry permits, a federal "bright-line" standard would permit carrying in places other than police stations; courthouses; public polling places; meetings of state, county, or municipal governing bodies; schools; passenger areas of airports; and certain other locations. * The bill applies to D.C., Puerto Rico and U.S. territories. * It would not create a federal licensing system; it would require the states to recognize each others’ carry permits, just as they recognize drivers’ licenses and carry permits held by armored car guards.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 111th; banglist; bho44; bhobanglist; carry; guns; handgun; tiahrt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: ME-262; All
I used to agree with this type of bill but after studying the possible ramifications on down the line, I think it is a dangerous move.

I am now completely against any Federal moves into what is a States Rights issue, it allows the federal government to further entangle itself, usurping State power.

After a few years on the books and funding to the states (= Leash) you will probably need a Federal Inter-State CCW Permit... for continuity and safety of course.

41 posted on 03/27/2009 2:23:34 PM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

very true but sadly I can’t take it to jail either.

It’s frustrating trying to figure out how to get from the south to up there


42 posted on 03/27/2009 2:24:31 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick MA,CT sham marriage end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ME-262

BTTT


43 posted on 03/27/2009 2:24:56 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

More like a DD214 and a certificate of live birth. Just to keep the government OUT of a “right”.


44 posted on 03/27/2009 2:30:44 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (That Kenyan bastard is not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

This was years ago, but when I was a young Captain in the USAF, I was a legal resident of Florida and had a permit. My attitude was, “I’m on active duty defending my country, I have a permit from my state of legal residence so I can carry this weapon wherever I please.”

Years later, I was stopped in California because I had Florida plates on my vehicle and the CHP officer said, “I’ve seen you around here before. Why don’t you have California plates on your vehicle?” I had a loaded 12 ga on the back seat, but as soon as I showed my military ID, he thanked me and drove off.


45 posted on 03/27/2009 2:34:45 PM PDT by CholeraJoe (Turning gold into lead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ME-262

2nd amendment says my right to bear arms shall never be infringed. What is it about conceal carry that’s so appealing? Its infringing on my right to carry by making me get a license... Eff that.


46 posted on 03/27/2009 2:56:08 PM PDT by smith288 (Americans suffer from Stockholm Syndrome with the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

No, this would not be nice.

RKBA advocates should not pursue this type of legislation under any circumstances.

Think very hard for a moment of the mischief that lays down the road of “federal licensing” for the possession and carrying of firearms...

No. Just say no.


47 posted on 03/27/2009 3:06:21 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

Bingo. You, sir, have grasped the ramifications of this legislation.

Once we create a federal licensing database... it is the thin edge of the wedge that will constantly be expanded.

No. We don’t go there.


48 posted on 03/27/2009 3:07:59 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NVDave; All
Once we create a federal licensing database... it is the thin edge of the wedge that will constantly be expanded.

This is one of those ideas that looks good on the surface, but when you pull back the layers... Not so good. ;-(

We need to get the word out to all 2A groups, family and friends to contact Reps and pull support for this bill.

49 posted on 03/27/2009 3:29:27 PM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: manc
...hey we have to go to NH from NY but make sure your gun is unloaded when going through NY and make sure when you get to MA it is covered up, unloaded and you have told the authorities about your use of carry...

It's just a little ol' single digit amendment to the constitution.

Why make a fuss over simple trivialities? /s

Accept your granted gift to service given by the omnipotent power of Washington and show some appreciation for your God given freedoms for crying out loud. /ranting with sarcasm

Some day we all will know who works for who and will live in harmony via the knowledge.

50 posted on 03/27/2009 3:40:10 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: manc

Take the hint..... stay in Dixie


51 posted on 03/27/2009 3:46:41 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Why not a law stating that it is illegal to prevent a law abiding, sober person from carrying a firearms anywhere they want?

Whoa pardner, you're talking freedom there, can't have that.

52 posted on 03/27/2009 4:02:14 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
What we need is the States to stand up to the Fed and put them in their place.

What we need is for states to secede from the union!

53 posted on 03/27/2009 4:04:58 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ME-262
Not to nitpick here, but we already have one.
US Constitution Article IV Section I

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records and Judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

54 posted on 03/27/2009 4:32:54 PM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Yes indeed we do!!! Be nice if we ever had a President who, right after the swearing in ceremony, would immediately declare that all citizens are now part of the Militia, and have the duty to ‘bear arms’,as stated in the 2A!!!


55 posted on 03/27/2009 4:37:49 PM PDT by TXSonOfLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ME-262

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I rest my case! That there should be no right to carry laws and that the American Citizen is guaranteed to carry anywhere they deem fit and that congress or judicial should have a right to infringe on the 2 amendment!


56 posted on 03/27/2009 4:39:04 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ME-262

A couple months late on that bill...


57 posted on 03/27/2009 4:59:04 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ME-262
In states that do not issue carry permits, a federal "bright-line" standard would permit carrying in places other than police stations; courthouses; public polling places; meetings of state, county, or municipal governing bodies; schools; passenger areas of airports; and certain other locations.

So.....I here in the Illinois People's State, one of the last two holdouts with no CCW (< disdain>"how twentieth centure"< /disdain>), if I get a Florida, Utah, Pennsylvania, or whatever permit, I'm good to go in Illinois?

Or, out of state folks have more rights than I do?

58 posted on 03/27/2009 5:34:32 PM PDT by Lee N. Field (Dispensational exegesis not supported by an a-, post- or historic pre-mil scholar will be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

I think it is time we enforce the Constitution.


59 posted on 03/27/2009 6:00:58 PM PDT by dmcnash (Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

“What we need is for states to secede from the union!”

If all else fails then that rather extreme measure most certainly as a last resort.

I would think it preferable for all efforts towards maintaining the Union before such actions towards dissolution of 230 years of our Republic.


60 posted on 03/27/2009 6:11:44 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson