Posted on 05/24/2009 2:54:08 PM PDT by decimon
Listening to Tom Standage talking about his new book, An Edible History of Humanity this morning I was reminded of a paper written by the anthropologist and author Jared Diamond in the late 1980's.
Diamond described agriculture as, "the worst mistake in the history of the human race".
Farming was, he argued, a catastrophe from which we have never quite recovered. With agriculture came "the social and sexual inequality, disease and despotism, that curse our existence".
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
Farming allowed a larger population. Farmers had more descendants, creating a Darwinian advantage for the farmers. That is why farming spread.
I could do it. But I get to be the priest. I need hot showers, I want to surf the net during work hours, and fresh brewed coffee half a dozen times a day. Just want to make that clear before we get too far into it.
But yeah, hunter gatherer. Sounds great.
Which means that in a Darwinian context, the farmers became adapted better, more fit and survived.
The problem in Saudi Arabia is between the ultra conservative herders of the desert and the settled ag dependent cities. The same is true in Afghanistan
I’ll defer to C.O. I’m sure he can properly explain why the BBC author is wrong is much fewer words than I can. :-)
Sunday, May 24, 2009
The Stone Age Economics of the Left: Who Would Jesus Bail Out?
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8580258&postID=6278454552434880646
An Edible History of Humanity
by Tom Standage
Audio CD
Hardcover
Hardcover
Hardcover
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks decimon.With agriculture came "the social and sexual inequality, disease and despotism, that curse our existence".IOW, its sufficient to say that the writer of that is stupid. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Come now. Agriculture did not cause sexual inequality.
It may have done this in aggregate. However, most examinations of hunter-gatherer societies show that they only need about two to three hours a day to get their daily sustenance. Kind of like lions, from what I understand.
Not if I have to make the line, make the hook, make the pole, and make everything I need to make those things....
And that is just the fishing.
We’d be spending all our time surviving, protecting what we had, watching our backs for someone that is bigger and stronger than us, or in roving bands. Life would be much, much worse in many, many ways.
11. At 09:16am on 20 May 2009, yarbles1234 wrote:
Surely the reason agriculture spread is because agricultural societies can support an army.
...and the demise of agriculture will be because agricultural societies can support excess Liberal academics.
As to With agriculture came "the social and sexual inequality, disease and despotism, that curse our existence," I was under the impression that The Noble Savage had had a stake driven through its heart decades ago.
You’re absolutely right. The point he’s trying to make is that agriculture is a compromise. Quality of life was sacrificed for the sheer power of numbers.
Advanced civilization comes much much later (Thousands of years). Until very recently most people have been serfs, and have had a very poor quality of life.
Another point that he does not make, but I believe to be true, is that we would all be healthier if we ate a hunter gatherer diet. Meat, vegetables, fruits, NO grains.
Yes, it would be a healthier diet,, but if you were growing your own food, you would get enough exercise that you could afford to eat a lot more carbs.
Speaking as a Farmer here,,, this guy is nuts. He has no idea how difficult it is to grow enough food to feed a family for an entire year. Certainly, it can be done,, but it would be a pretty boring diet.
I prefer to specialize in a few crops, and depend on other farmers to grow the other things I feed my family.Somebody needs to hide this guy's STUPID PILLS before he writes his next book.
Such nonsense.
All of these conditions are present in some hunter-gatherer cultures.
None of these conditions are present in every agricultural culture.
In short, agriculture did not cause any "curse of our existence." It's a ridiculous article.
One of the comments in the article was “Humanity is a virus, someday Earth will find a cure”. And deadb0y was serious about it.
This pseudoscientist referenced in the article blames nearly all of societies ills on agriculture. He just needs to add racism, sexism, and homophobia to complete the list. Definitely an ivory tower academic with no exposure to the outside world, and would say that we on this board have “sheltered lives” for disagreeing with him to boot.
That hardly seems to be the theme of his book Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies.
I get your drift but I believe it's inaccurate at the present time.
There is very little agriculture in SA, for obvious reasons. Even the few remaining herders aren't dependent on their animals for survival. They herd in Toyota pickups and SUVs provided by government subsidies.
In reality, every single person in SA is utterly dependent on exported oil. If the country were ever shut off from the outside, the vast majority would quickly die.
You are correct historically speaking. Up until the oil bonanza there was constant conflict between the settled and nomadic populations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.