Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The secret fuel that made the Spitfire supreme
Royal Society of Chemistry ^ | 13 May 2009 | Brian Emsley

Posted on 05/29/2009 5:03:39 PM PDT by neverdem

In the year that sees the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of the Second World War, a previously untold story has emerged of how, through a "miracle" chemical breakthrough, Spitfire and Hurricane fighters gained the edge over German fighters to win the Battle of Britain.

An American scientist and author has claimed that the famed pair of war-winning aeroplanes gained superior altitude, manoeuvrability and rate of climb by a revolutionary high-octane fuel supplied to Britain by the USA just in time for the battle.

Books, documentaries, and movies have chronicled the brilliant contribution of UK designers and engineers behind the legendary fighter planes that won the Battle of Britain, preventing invasion of the British Isles.

The courage and sacrifice of RAF pilots who flew the aeroplanes is rightly celebrated and their bravery has become an inspirational chapter of the British national story.

What has not been known until now, however, is the story of the revolutionary aviation fuel supplied to the RAF by an American company, using a process invented by a Frenchman, without which Spitfires and Hurricanes might not have achieved crucial dominance over the Luftwaffe.

The Royal Society of Chemistry read the claims about Eugene Houdry, and his process at the Sun Oil Company, in a paper written originally for the journal Invention and Technology by American science writer Tim Palucka.

The introduction to the paper by Palucka says of Houdry: "His miraculous catalyst turned nearly worthless sludge into precious high-octane gasoline and helped the Allies to win World War II."

He continued: "That process would make a crucial difference in mid-1940 when the Royal Air Force started filling its Spitfires and Hurricanes with the 100-octane gasoline imported from the United States instead of the 87-octane gasoline it had formerly used."

The RSC is inviting experts and the public to challenge the new claim and if it remains intact then the society will send the report to aviation and military historians to mark the newly-discovered contribution of chemists to victory in one of the key battles.

Eugene Houdry, born in France, developed, after settling in the USA, one of the earliest catalysts to convert useless crude oil into high octane fuel. He revealed the "cracking" process at a Chicago chemicals conference in 1938

The 100-octane fuel that resulted from the Houdry Process increased the Spitfire's speed by 25 mph at sea level by 34 mph at 10,000 feet.

This extra speed gave the British fighters in the summer of 1940 the edge over the Luftwaffe above the English Channel and in the skies of London and south-east England.

With the balance tipped towards the British, the German invasion was abandoned and Hitler turned eastwards, allowing the UK armed forces time to regroup and to revive.

"Luftwaffe pilots couldn't believe they were facing the same planes they had fought successfully over France a few months before. The planes were the same but the fuel wasn't," said Palucka.

Tim Palucka says that in the 1943 book The Amazing Petroleum Industry, V A Kalichevsky of the Socony-Vacuum Oil Company explained what high-octane gasoline meant to Britain. Kalichevsky wrote:

"It is an established fact that a difference of only 13 points in octane number made possible the defeat of the Luftwaffe by the RAF in the fall of 1940. This difference, slight as its seems, is sufficient to give a plane the vital edge in altitude, rate of climb and manoeuvrability that spells the difference between defeat and victory.

Contact and Further Information Brian Emsley Media Relations Manager Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BA Tel: +44 (0)20 7440 3317 or +44 (0) 7966 939257 Fax: +44 (0)20 7437 8883 Email: Brian Emsley


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Technical; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 100octane; battleofbritain; chemistry; godsgravesglyphs; hurricanes; raf; spitfires; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Better living & surviving through chemistry!
1 posted on 05/29/2009 5:03:39 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Wow. Another piece of the puzzle of how the Brits won the battle of Britain (if it’s true).


2 posted on 05/29/2009 5:10:13 PM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

100-octane fuel has never been a secret.


3 posted on 05/29/2009 5:14:07 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

It’s true. 100/130 octane aviation gasoline was one of the U.S. secret weapons that neither Germany nor Japan could produce on a mass basis.


4 posted on 05/29/2009 5:14:53 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Another little non-secret secret is that U.S. chemists from American oil companies analyzed the fuels captured from downed German Messerschmitts and Jap zeros, and provided that info to the Army Air Corps and U.S. Navy so that our pilots could have yet another small advantage over the enemy in combat.


5 posted on 05/29/2009 5:17:20 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And if we would have given them our crap gas today with ethanol in it, they would have been sitting ducks and speaking German in no time flat.


6 posted on 05/29/2009 5:21:04 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Nowadays they’d be forced to use a 15 percent ethanol blend—to save the earth, of course.


7 posted on 05/29/2009 5:21:57 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
In 1987 had a 64 Lincoln Continental that required 99 octane. I could run it on 93 by retarding the timing, but it was a slug. A couple of times I was able to put aviation gas in it and it ran like a scalded monkey. Man that was fun. However, at 8 miles to the gallon, and the nearest airport 60 miles away, it was a pretty rare occurence.
8 posted on 05/29/2009 5:22:13 PM PDT by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The secret was ...

White Lightnin!!!’


9 posted on 05/29/2009 5:22:38 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (No greater friend, no worse enemy -The United States Marine Corps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

More octane, crank in a few more degrees of timing and make more power. Pretty basic racing info. The British must have just not had the technology to produce the fuel.


10 posted on 05/29/2009 5:23:14 PM PDT by Clay Moore (Obama: A good example of why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I ran across this story thirty years ago.

The secret to winning the Battle of Britain - tetraethyl lead.


11 posted on 05/29/2009 5:23:14 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Sure the higher octane helped but the Spitfire was a flat better designed airplane and the Hurricane was rugged as hell.


12 posted on 05/29/2009 5:24:43 PM PDT by colorado tanker ("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I have had the opportunity to hear a Spit engine a couple of times.

Once heard, you never forget it. Beautiful aircraft.


13 posted on 05/29/2009 5:24:56 PM PDT by alarm rider (Any country that tells you what light bulb to use is not a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
100-octane fuel has never been a secret.

True. Jimmy Doolittle showed the advantages of it in the 1930s while working for Shell.
14 posted on 05/29/2009 5:27:59 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Toward the end of the war, the Germans actually used ethanol to fuel their fighters. Worked pretty well...but not well-enough.


15 posted on 05/29/2009 5:28:53 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

they would have been sitting ducks and speaking German in no time flat.

Actually, they would be dead.
Putting alcohol in aviation fuel = crash landing all of the time.

Its why we can’t use a Mogas cert anymore for our aircraft.


16 posted on 05/29/2009 5:31:37 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well, that is all well and good, but what kind of ‘carbon footprint’ did those things leave? Hmmmm? No wonder we have had global warming ever since. :-))


17 posted on 05/29/2009 5:31:55 PM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

OH NO!!!! Demon petroleum helped save the free world?

What will the moonbat environmentalists think now?

Probably just ignore it.


18 posted on 05/29/2009 5:33:45 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Don't you wish you had supported a conservative when you had the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I have read extensively on WWII, especially as regards the air war since I’m a pilot (Air Force) and I don’t recall ever seeing that fact. Just goes to show, you’re never too old to learn.


19 posted on 05/29/2009 5:34:32 PM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It obviously helped. But the Germans were operating on constrained fuel (and thus reduced combat time) reserves anyway, because of having to cross the Channel, as well as being up against the determination of British, American and Polish pilots who knew they were the only thing standing between the Nazis and full invasion. You put anyone’s back to the wall - watch out.


20 posted on 05/29/2009 5:39:16 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson