Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Easily grossed out? You're more likely a conservative, study says (Cornell U.)
Cornell Chronicle ^ | June 3, 2009 | By Lauren Gold

Posted on 06/05/2009 4:48:53 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Are you someone who squirms when confronted with slime, shudders at stickiness or gets grossed out by gore? Do crawly insects make you cringe or dead bodies make you blanch?

If so, chances are you're more conservative -- politically, and especially in your attitudes toward gays and lesbians -- than your less-squeamish counterparts, according to two Cornell studies.

The results, said study leader David Pizarro, Cornell assistant professor of psychology, raise questions about the role of disgust -- an emotion that likely evolved in humans to keep them safe from potentially hazardous or disease-carrying environments -- in contemporary judgments of morality and purity.

In the first study, published in the journal Cognition & Emotion (Vol.23: No.4), Pizarro and co-authors Yoel Inbar of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and Paul Bloom of Yale University surveyed 181 U.S. adults from politically mixed "swing states." They subjected these adults to two indexes: the Disgust Sensitivity Scale (DSS), which offers various scenarios to assess disgust sensitivity, and a political ideology scale. From this they found a correlation between being more easily disgusted and political conservatism.

To test whether disgust sensitivity is linked to specific conservative attitudes, the researchers then surveyed 91 Cornell undergraduates with the DSS, as well as with questions about their positions on issues including gay marriage, abortion, gun control, labor unions, tax cuts and affirmative action.

Participants who rated higher in disgust sensitivity were more likely to oppose gay marriage and abortion, issues that are related to notions of morality or purity. The researchers also found a weak correlation between disgust sensitivity and support for tax cuts, but no link between disgust sensitivity and the other issues.

And in a separate study in the current issue of the journal Emotion (Vol.9: No.3), Pizarro and colleagues found a link between higher disgust sensitivity and disapproval of gays and lesbians. For this study, the researchers used implicit measures (measures that have been shown to assess attitudes people may be unwilling to report explicitly; or that they may not even know they possess).

Liberals and conservatives disagree about whether disgust has a valid place in making moral judgments, Pizarro noted. Conservatives have argued that there is inherent wisdom in repugnance; that feeling disgusted about something -- gay sex between consenting adults, for example -- is cause enough to judge it wrong or immoral, even lacking a concrete reason. Liberals tend to disagree, and are more likely to base judgments on whether an action or a thing causes actual harm.

Studying the link between disgust and moral judgment could help explain the strong differences in people's moral opinions, Pizarro said; and it could offer strategies for persuading some to change their views.

"People have pointed out for a long time that a lot of our moral values seem driven by emotion, and in particular, disgust appears to be one of those emotions that seems to be recruited for moral judgments," said Pizarro.

That can have tragic effects -- as in cases throughout history where minorities have been victims of discrimination by groups that perceived them as having disgusting characteristics.

The research speaks to a need for caution when forming moral judgments, Pizarro added. "Disgust really is about protecting yourself from disease; it didn't really evolve for the purpose of human morality," he said. "It clearly has become central to morality, but because of its origins in contamination and avoidance, we should be wary about its influences."

The studies were funded by Cornell


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cityofevil; cornell; ithaca; junkscience; leftismoncampus; liberalbias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: cripplecreek
Think of it this way ~ Leftwingtards are desensitized, numbed, without empathy, brutish, .............

There are so many words that so clearly cover their grossness it's just gotta' make you think there are sound evolutionarily correct reasons why those words arose.

(Yup, this is a time even Creationists can cite Darwin's followers ~ they generally argue there are sound reasons for everything, and that's gotta' include "disgust").

21 posted on 06/05/2009 5:20:22 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Good grief! It amazes me what passes for 'higher learning' now-days.

Do these educated idiot not realize they contradict themselves?

If so, chances are you're more conservative -- politically, and especially in your attitudes toward gays and lesbians

an emotion that likely evolved in humans to keep them safe from potentially hazardous or disease-carrying environments

'Gays and lesbians' ARE 'potentially hazardous or disease-carrying environments', you stupid schmucks, so finding them disgusting is a normal, natural reaction.

22 posted on 06/05/2009 5:25:08 AM PDT by MamaTexan (~*~*~*~*~ DICTATORS DON'T HAVE FRIENDS ~*~*~*~*~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Just guessing but I suspect liberals would evolve into a much smaller weaker species. They would likely lose a lot of genetic diversity due to bottlenecks brought on by low birth numbers because of abortion and homosexuality.


23 posted on 06/05/2009 5:27:24 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
chances are you're more conservative -- politically, and especially in your attitudes toward gays and lesbians -- than your less-squeamish counterparts

Evil disgusts me. Truth disgusts the liberals.

Crock study slanted against truth.
24 posted on 06/05/2009 5:28:14 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Regardless of your feelings on evolution, I think a total separation of conservatives and liberals could lead to some very interesting developments over the eons.

LMAO! They'd be out of money in 6 weeks and would die off in a few generations since everyone is forced to accept homosexuality and abortion would be rampant.

The problem with today's culture is that everything is disposable. Young adults-I use that word loosely-are in it for themselves and generally disdain responsiblity. Some girl gets knocked up, "Family Planning" helps her to get rid of her "problem." SICK!

25 posted on 06/05/2009 5:28:46 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / MOLWN LABE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Bump


26 posted on 06/05/2009 5:29:34 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
a study with an agenda

yep - the libs are more tolerant (less squeamish) of parasites.
27 posted on 06/05/2009 5:31:04 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

What a bunch of.... I’m too squeamish to say....


28 posted on 06/05/2009 5:32:13 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Not exactly "smaller" but certainly "weaker". Species who succeed in living in the Arctic have either gotten massively large, or much smaller.

It's a personal body heat problem that can be resolved simply by evolving away from our tropical norms.

Leftwingtards might not change size, but since they are clearly not using their brains for anything, they would become more bovine than they are now. I would expect strong herd instincts to arrise.

29 posted on 06/05/2009 5:33:23 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

You have to go a long way to gross me out. And while I do not find abortion, homosexuality, etc “gross” I do find them morally repugnant and yes even (gasp) WRONG. But in the end, it is not my moral outrage that counts, but God’s.

Another study where the data were interpreted in a manner consistent with the desired outcome. My kids do that all the time! I wonder how much we paid for this whopper.


30 posted on 06/05/2009 5:35:20 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Stuff doesn’t bother me, and I’m a conservative.

Then again, I worked in crash recovery for ten years while I was in the Air Force.


31 posted on 06/05/2009 5:39:06 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (Save the Hispaniolan Solenodon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
These 'studies' are disgusting.


32 posted on 06/05/2009 5:41:21 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Surely, it took several Million dollars of Pork “stimulus” to come up with this brilliance.

Now this is something truly worth while to know and advances our technology or economic health to new levels! </s.>


33 posted on 06/05/2009 5:45:29 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Give me LIBERTY or give me an M-24A2!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This ARTICLE disgusts me! LOL.


34 posted on 06/05/2009 5:45:40 AM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Doesn’t surprise me.

Libs are a rather coarse group, all things considered!


35 posted on 06/05/2009 6:13:09 AM PDT by Daisyjane69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

Libs can handle counting baby parts to make sure the abortion is complete. I would say that denotes someone who is absent any compassion or humanity.


36 posted on 06/05/2009 6:54:42 AM PDT by Tessarie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

related topics:

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (HUSSEIN IS AT 0% ON RASMUSSEN!!)
Rasmussen | 06/05/09
Posted on 06/05/2009 6:53:19 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2265462/posts
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 06/05/2009 7:00:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2265462/posts

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (HUSSEIN IS AT 0% ON RASMUSSEN!!)
Rasmussen | 06/05/09
Posted on 06/05/2009 6:53:19 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2265462/posts
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 06/05/2009 6:59:40 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2265460/posts


37 posted on 06/05/2009 7:12:53 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelTXRose

I have a lib sister in law who loves the slasher movies but cannot handle raw chicken. It grosses her out. This is an attitude that I have noticed with other libs too, they like to see the gore but cannot handle really dealing with it on a personal level. I cannot stand to watch those kinds of movies and have no problems with butchering chickens. It seems to me to be a problem with accepting reality and dealing with it, not just watching some type of fantasy on the screen and not having to clean up the gore. I can just imagine how sister in law would react if she had to clean up something like she likes to see in the movies, the whining and crying would be epic.


38 posted on 06/05/2009 7:19:59 AM PDT by Ann de IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Well. I was pretty grossed out when Joe Theismann broke his leg and they showed it over and over and over. Still get sympathy pains in my legs when I think about it...

I’m okay with blood and cuts and exposed internal organs. But I see somebody snap a bone? I shudder and my stomach starts turning as the “pain” runs through my own limbs.


39 posted on 06/05/2009 7:27:31 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; governsleastgovernsbest; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; John Valentine; ...
City of Evil bump:


40 posted on 06/05/2009 7:28:35 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson