Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pictured: The Massive Floating Destroyer The Americans Are Sending To Keep North Korean Missiles...
Telegraph(UK) ^ | June 19, 2009

Posted on 06/19/2009 6:08:19 PM PDT by Steelfish

Pictured: The massive floating destroyer the Americans are sending to keep North Korean missiles at bay

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER 19th June 2009

USS John McCain: The destroyer has been deployed to intercept a North Korean vessel suspected of carrying illicit weapons

The U.S. military is planning to intercept a North Korean ship suspected of carrying illicit nuclear materials and missiles.

Navy destroyer the USS John McCain has been deployed to intercept the Kang Nam as it leaves the coast of China, according to a senior US defence official.

The ship, which left a port in North Korea on Wednesday, appears to be heading towards Singapore.

Its suspected cargo is in violation of a UN Security Council resolution passed last Friday, and it is now being constantly monitored by air.

The Kang Nam is the first ship the U.S. has tracked from North Korea since the UN imposed sanctions following the country's recent nuclear test.

The resolution bans North Korea from exporting a wide range of weaponry - but does not allow the US to forcibly board the vessel.

Instead, they would have to ask for permission - which, in all likelihood, would not be granted.

North Korea has already stated that any attempt to board its ships without permisson would be viewed as an act of war.

It promised '100- or 1,000-fold' retaliation if provoked.

The latest tension follows a recent report in Japan's Yomiuri newspaper that North Korea may fire a long-range ballistic missile toward Hawaii in early July.

The Taepodong-2 missile has a range of 4,000 miles, but even though Hawaii is 4500 miles away, the US has already deployed anti-missile defences around the state.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: destroyer; kangnam; northkorea; shipmovement; tm; usnavy; ussjohnmccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2009 6:08:19 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
We got yer massive all right.
2 posted on 06/19/2009 6:11:15 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

My headline:

“Obama sends McCain to deal with NK threat”


3 posted on 06/19/2009 6:12:43 PM PDT by dk88 (Kill it grill it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

As opposed to a non-floating destroyer?


4 posted on 06/19/2009 6:13:00 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 151 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Big sounding story, but according to the fine print, we aren’t going to do anything.


5 posted on 06/19/2009 6:15:16 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis

“Big sounding story, but according to the fine print, we aren’t going to do anything.”

Just like the senator nothing good will be done!


6 posted on 06/19/2009 6:19:21 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

USS John McCain

7 posted on 06/19/2009 6:21:40 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The massive floating destroyer

Well it is massive, so that it floats may shock some. The headline makes it sound like it isn't even under power.

8 posted on 06/19/2009 6:21:52 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

9 posted on 06/19/2009 6:23:40 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sunny beaches! It FLOATS! I am stuneded.


10 posted on 06/19/2009 6:24:40 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Since when is a Destroyer a “massive” ship. They are used as life boats for Air Craft carriers.


11 posted on 06/19/2009 6:25:14 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

12 posted on 06/19/2009 6:25:23 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

GO USNA!


13 posted on 06/19/2009 6:26:44 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It promised ‘100- or 1,000-fold’ retaliation if provoked.
**********
If so,we could give them a 5 megaton retaliation.


14 posted on 06/19/2009 6:26:53 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Remember last week or so. This is the same ship that caught a Chinese sub in its towed array.


15 posted on 06/19/2009 6:27:41 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dk88

LOL


16 posted on 06/19/2009 6:27:50 PM PDT by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
The headline makes it sound like it isn't even under power.

LMAO. Right it's just floating. Like my rubber duckie.

17 posted on 06/19/2009 6:28:10 PM PDT by Kudsman (A lifetime of public service = a lifetime of getting serviced by the public.- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

Massive? Destroyers have a nickname, Tin Can for a reason. Massive is the Ronald Reagan or any CVN ship. 5000 sailors in one ship. Small city on the move.


18 posted on 06/19/2009 6:28:44 PM PDT by Texas resident (Texan by birth and by choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Awesome pic! Thanks


19 posted on 06/19/2009 6:29:23 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“The resolution bans North Korea from exporting a wide range of weaponry - but does not allow the US to forcibly board the vessel.
Instead, they would have to ask for permission - which, in all likelihood, would not be granted. “

So...we ask to inspect the ship...NK refuses and then that’s it? Welcome to the Era of Useless Diplomacy..


20 posted on 06/19/2009 6:29:33 PM PDT by heiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson