Skip to comments.
U.S. Navy Hangs Back in Persian Gulf as Questions Mount About Defecting Iranian Revolutionary Guard
Fox news ^
| June 22, 2009
| Katherine Herridge
Posted on 06/22/2009 10:35:07 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Jeff Head
To: nuconvert
To: Jet Jaguar
more of the “present” we have become familiar with.
4
posted on
06/22/2009 10:40:24 AM PDT
by
reefdiver
(So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
To: Jet Jaguar
Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Defense is "on edge" over the turmoil in Iran, and has directed U.S. naval assets in the Persian Gulf to be, in layman's terms, in "non-incident mode." U.S. military commanders are said to have been instructed to be alert to any possibility of a clash with Iranian naval assets, and to position themselves in such a way as to diminish the ability of Iran to stage an incident, however small, that could be used to rally the support of the Iranian people to the regime and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose backers are accused of voter fraud in the national election 10 days ago. Short Version: Obama has ordered our Navy not to fire back if attacked.
5
posted on
06/22/2009 10:41:04 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: Jet Jaguar
Whoa! A lot of Iranians, many military, defected around 1979. We could be seeing a second wave.
6
posted on
06/22/2009 10:42:06 AM PDT
by
SueRae
To: Jet Jaguar
Members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard are showing "discontent" and some are "contemplating the contingency" of defying the regime in the wake of last week's disputed election, the former crown prince of Iran contended Monday. True or wishful thinking? Anyone have inside info?
7
posted on
06/22/2009 10:42:16 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
To: Jet Jaguar
**Questions Mount About Defecting Iranian Revolutionary Guard**
Wow, I had not heard this, but then I don’t have a working TV.
8
posted on
06/22/2009 10:42:22 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(With God all things are possible.)
To: pabianice
I’m certainly no fan of zero, but to me, this makes sense. let the candle snuff itself out, don’t throw fuel on the fire which would only serve to make the mullahs appear wise. This way, attention can remain focused on the uprisings, not a national battle against a common enemy, the USA.
9
posted on
06/22/2009 10:43:37 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: colorado tanker
True or wishful thinking? Anyone have inside info? Considering the source I'd say probably wishful thinking. But if it is true, and if those you would expect to be most loyal to the regime are talking about deserting, then it doesn't bode well for the current Iranian government.
To: Jet Jaguar
Perhaps false information, to start the defections.
11
posted on
06/22/2009 10:47:48 AM PDT
by
Kakaze
(Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
To: Travis T. OJustice
Let their hope for freedom be snuffed out? I don’t get it.
12
posted on
06/22/2009 10:49:44 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(The earth is bipolar.)
To: pabianice
I can appreciate having the Navy position themselves so they wouldn't necessarily have to defend themselves. It's one thing for the US civilian leadership to speak out and support freedom. It's not like it's a secret or anything, we've only been doing it for 233 years. And ZerØ has been far too timid in that regard IMO.
But having our forces engage, even defensively, Iranian assets at this particular time, would be a detriment to the freedom movement taking place in Iran. I'm not saying they shouldn't defend themselves if the situation warrants, just that they should try and avoid being in the position to have to do so.
To: Mark was here
I dont get it.I can tell.
14
posted on
06/22/2009 10:52:16 AM PDT
by
Travis T. OJustice
(I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
To: Travis T. OJustice
Well explain your self better for dolts like me.
15
posted on
06/22/2009 10:54:17 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(The earth is bipolar.)
To: Jet Jaguar
If the Iran Gov’t is really splitting apart, the US Navy should really watch out for rogue elements launching anti-ship missiles.
16
posted on
06/22/2009 10:54:21 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Jet Jaguar
***...”expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to avoid any unnecessary escalation or confrontation” with Iranian ships or other military assets. ***
Don’t worry! Obama and friends will find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of VICTORY!
17
posted on
06/22/2009 10:54:38 AM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(A modern liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do so long as it is compulsory.)
To: Travis T. OJustice
Giving moral support to the protesters is, in no way, throwing fuel on the fire.
I agree that we should take no provocative military action yet, but the protesters need our support...they need to know we are with them.
18
posted on
06/22/2009 10:56:55 AM PDT
by
SonOfDarkSkies
(Obama: "Enough about me, let's talk about you...what do you think of me?")
To: Non-Sequitur
It’s interesting to me that they’ve sent this Basij militia into the streets instead of the Guards. It may be a lot of Guardsmen won’t fire on their own civilians. Just speculation.
19
posted on
06/22/2009 10:57:01 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
To: pabianice
No, I think it’s more of a case of “don’t do anything that would make yourself a target.” He wants our assets there to steer clear and keep an eye on things, but not to put themselves in a position where I’manutjob or the mullahs could stage an attack and then scream to the world when the USN defends itself.
}:-)4
20
posted on
06/22/2009 10:57:47 AM PDT
by
Moose4
(Hey RNC. Don't move toward the middle. MOVE THE MIDDLE TOWARD YOU.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson